DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah Hockey Club
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah Hockey Club
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
bigbrit93
bigbrit93
Member Since
Oct. 18, 2016
Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
2nd Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
Forum Posts
314
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 14, 2018 at 9:25 a.m.
Thread:
Blues deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>The cost to acquire Tarasenko wouldn't be worth it to Boston. Great player, but you only have so many big money contracts before you start having to pinch pennies.</div></div>
Yeah. I assume they'd probably ask for Pasta as the first return, then DeBrusk or Charlie. I in no way see the Bruins swinging this outside of my dream world, but wanted to see what the lineup could look like.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 13, 2018 at 12:46 p.m.
Thread:
Blues deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>If u switch Senyshyn to Debrusk, just maybe</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BluesGetTheCup</b></div><div>Take off Senyshyn and Donato and add Debrusk imo.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Ya little short on Blues deal, no Debrusk, no deal from their end. Defeats the purpose.
WTF is that Kings deal. ?</div></div>
Trading DeBrusk defeats my purpose of making the Bruins amazing haha.
The Krug deal was purely cap dump to a team that might not have been on his list when he signed (which I'm not even sure Kings can take).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 11, 2018 at 2:03 p.m.
Thread:
Need that secondary Scoring
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Newgod77</b></div><div>Ducks just signed Henrique so doubt they trade him. Ty Anderson might not be the source either. A lot of click bait stuff.
Silfverberg would be a good pick up for a prospect and pick though.</div></div>
I saw him post an article, so that might have just been his take on all the speculation that was brought to him, but that article was the first I'd seen of the thought.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mattyb929</b></div><div>I question your evaluation of Cehlarik. If he is NHL ready then why is he behind several players who have yet to make any NHL impact.</div></div>
There are much smarter people than me making the decision whether he plays or not, but from the limited sample size he fit our scheme well and has a decent scoring touch. I've seen and heard a few writers say that Cehlarik should probably be given a look. I think he carries value either way and would be a useful trade chip.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 2, 2018 at 2:32 p.m.
Thread:
18-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>The original asking price was 1st and mid level prospect. But now that the dust has settled teams that missed out may push that price up. Supposedly there were a couple of offers agreed upon but Skinner would not waive his NMC for. That could drive his price. Or he may just decline everything, play out his contract and have his options open. My guess is 1st and Heinen. Pens have a lot of interest in him. Canes have a lot of interest in Tristan Jarry. Would not be surprised if he ends up there if he does agree to a trade.</div></div>
Ah ok. Thanks for the info! Between him and Panarin, I think Skinner would be much easier to obtain purely based on the original asks I had seen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 2, 2018 at 2:04 p.m.
Thread:
18-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Not bad at all. Think it would take Krug and Cehlarik for Klef. Price for Skinner has probably gone up. That would have done it a few weeks ago.</div></div>
Ok so Krug + Cehlarik for Klefbom. Would you say price for Skinner is still a prospect + 1st (Bjork and 1st) or do you think the price has jumped a lot where it's multiple mid->top level prospects and picks?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23, 2018 at 1:18 p.m.
Thread:
Nurse?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>vinnylou</b></div><div>If we didn't trade nurse for Dougie... We're not about to trade him for Krug. I like him but.. No if we're trading him.. It's for a right shot. But again no, we love this kid</div></div>
Thanks for the input. I didn't realize EDM were that high on him. Thought for some reason he was in the backseat compared with Klefbom. Maybe I have the two of them mixed up?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 20, 2018 at 11:52 a.m.
Thread:
Donato
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>nashless</b></div><div>Book it (per McGuire, I think he's right)! Donato will join team this season and make Immediate impact. I'd be more interested in him than debrusk as a NYR, or even as a bruin. He mentioned someone else who will join, I think a dman?</div></div>
It might have been Lindgren (also team USA). But I'm not certain, I hadn't heard a d-man in the Donato talks.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 20, 2018 at 11:51 a.m.
Thread:
Donato
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rangersandislesfan</b></div><div>Boston doesn't need a #1 in OEL, maybe they could use an upgrade in that #2 spot but they don't need a #1. Also, not sure if ARI does this.</div></div>
OEL would be the #2 for as long as Chara plays like how he has this year (which could just be the rest of this year and next). And it wasn't a final offer for OEL, more just a guideline of how I could envision Spooner being used in a trade if the Bruins did in fact move him to make room for Donato.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 14, 2018 at 4:57 p.m.
Thread:
Offer Sheets?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>phillyjabroni</b></div><div>Unfortunately, you cannot offer sheet more than one RFA at a time if the compensation needed for both deals is involved in another.
By offer sheeting Darnell Nurse, it requires a 2018 1st, 2nd, and 3rd (all BOS picks). By offer sheeting Jacob Trouba, it requires (2) 1st round picks (2018 and 2019) and a 2018 2nd and 3rd round pick (all BOS picks).
The compensation won't work because you cannot get both of those players.</div></div>
Ah fair enough. Appreciate the info!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 13, 2018 at 9:14 p.m.
Thread:
NYR blockbuster?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div>Way too much for McDonagh. I get Nash is in this, but he's a UFA and walk at the end of the season. So you give up all that for an extra year of McDonagh? No thanks. These monster deals never happen at deadline time and for good reason. Too many moving parts. Also, why is Torey Krug the #7 defenseman?</div></div>
First time doing one on mobile, accidentally dragged Gryz above krug. And as for overpaying, I’ve seen analysts say anywhere from just a prospect +1st for McD to the entire farm for some teams. I feel for the bruins, this deal helps now (and next year with McD) without mortgaging the future (JFK hurts I’ll admit)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12, 2018 at 12:28 p.m.
Thread:
Rolling Into Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div>That Bailey contract gives me chest pain. He's not going to be worth close to 6M, never-mind 6.75. The guy hasn't done anything close to what he's doing this season. Even normal production from Bailey isn't worth that contract. Someone is going to overpay and I don't think it's Boston. I'm not a fan of moving Spooner in a deal to get Beleskey's contract out of here.
I offered a similar OEL deal, but I've soured on him as an acquisition. I'd much prefer McDonagh or someone different.
I don't mind your re-signings.</div></div>
I'll be 100% honest. I took a quick look at his stats, saw close to 60 points last year, and an increase this year and jumped on a top-6 contract for him. Now that I see his stats going back a few years, I mightily overpaid.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 8, 2018 at 4:12 p.m.
Thread:
Would Saad fit in Bos?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dragonlocks</b></div><div>- I think he would fit, but I don't see him as much of an upgrade from Spooner actually maybe a downgrade when considering the cap hit
- Chicago won't move him (well at this price they might)
- This is a gross over payment
- Now the positives... Saad is a lot better in his own end than Spooner is</div></div>
I think in the long run, he's an upgrade over Spooner (who I think is only playing his butt off for a contract). I wasn't too sure on the value, as I haven't seen a mock for Saad to the Bruins yet. I was going to go without the pick, but then thought maybe that was way too little.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 8, 2018 at 10:26 a.m.
Thread:
Turn it upside Down
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div>Anders Bjork hasn't been the same since that injury and after he returns from IR, he would benefit from going back to the AHL and playing down there. Jack Johnson is not an upgrade over Krug, and I wouldn't even consider him an upgrade on Grzelcyk at this point. Meanwhile, Spooner is having himself a solid year and I'd rather hold onto him at this point. He's an RFA in the off-season so he's still under control. You can reassess him then and deal him and/or sign him. I don't care for Johnson and I feel Spooner + 2nd is too rich of an offer for him.
We learned last year that NHL defensive depth is needed in the playoffs so i hold off on dealing McQuaid for a late round pick. He's a movable piece in the offseason if needed, but you can't have enough depth. RHD is weak to begin with for Boston, and who is the next man up, should any one of McAvoy/Carlo/Miller go down; Postma? Woof.</div></div>
Those are good points. The hope with the trade is that Johnson would play his ass off to get one last big contract, and maybe the B's could benefit from that. As for Postma, I'd feel more comfortable with O'Gara coming up (in the situation here that I've traded Quaider) and filling in for a few games.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25, 2018 at 9:50 a.m.
Thread:
Hoffman
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>I take issue with the comment that Zboril is a lesser prospect. He was the 13th pick in the draft. only Hanafin, Werenski, Provorov were taken ahead of him for Dmen. He has not progressed as quick. He seems to be traded away by ACGMs more than any other player on the roster. Lastly i am not a huge fan of his either. That being said to call him a lesser prospect is a bit harsh.</div></div>
Lesser wasn't meant to say he's a C-rated prospect. I just meant that compared to Seny, he has lesser trade value just based on his progression thus far. I still see him as progressing into a top-4, potentially top pairing d-man, but would prefer to keep Seny at this time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24, 2018 at 2:24 p.m.
Thread:
Hoffman
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Green4D4Again</b></div><div>I think it's fair but you have to consider that Ottawa has insane depth down the middle right now (C). Barring movement from players like Pageau, Smith and Brassard, Spooner is just not going to get ice-time / redundancy down the middle with the likes of White, Brown, Chlapik, Batherson ready to make the jump next year. Its players like Zenyshyn that Ottawa covets because they need a top 6 forward / winger in the future. Something like Zenyshyn, Fitzgerald and 1st would be the counter offer IMO.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div>I offered the same thing, minus Fitzgerald, in a mock. I'd be for this. Hoffman is capable of playing his off-wing and would potentially be deadly in the top 6.</div></div>
Yeah and to the fact OTT doesn't want Centers, Spooner has excelled on the wing this year, and Fitzgerald is capable of playing wing as well, which would give OTT more flexibility with their new pieces, as well as their own prospects being brought into the fray.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 18, 2018 at 9:58 a.m.
Thread:
Next Year Possibilities
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ragsandbluesfan</b></div><div>I agree keumper only looks that good because the kings always have a great defense dont get me wrong i like keumper but hes not worth 3 mil and why is o'gara not playing yet o'gara is making more than grzelcyj?</div></div>
O'Gara was signed for more than Gryz to begin with, so on the contract renewal I gave him a slight raise (50k I think). Gryz was signed at 600k I believe this year so I essentially gave him 150% of his current salary based on his play this season. That's the only reason O'Gara is still getting more.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 18, 2018 at 9:55 a.m.
Thread:
Next Year Possibilities
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BreKel</b></div><div>That's a lot of money to pay a backup. It's a possible lineup but I feel you see a big addition to either the top 6 forward of LHD.</div></div>
Yeah I thought about the possibility of a De Haan type to either take the top 4 LHD, or take the 3rd pairing to really solidify that group. I ultimately decided the youth we have could already provide that piece.
I've liked Kuemper since his time with the Wild, and figured that our defense is turning into a pretty solid group, paying extra for a backup could help the team throughout the year. It would especially let Tuukka rest more (unless Kuemper sh*ts the bed), which would hopefully make him stronger when it comes to a playoff run.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 14, 2017 at 9:09 a.m.
Thread:
Quick Mock
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TopCornerShot</b></div><div>Don't want Jagr back. Connauton isn't a legit top 6 defender. Heinen gets left out in this one in favor of DeBrusk, which I don't think is likely. Seeing how Nash is better defensively and was 49% FO last season and Czarnik was about 43%, I don't see how you have Czarnik getting the call at C.
The overall structure of the team is good, but there were some problems.</div></div>
I like Jagr, as long as he will play the role he should at his age/skill. He's no longer a full-time top 6, and is an extremely useful PP specialist. If he would be willing to play that role, then I think he could be more helpful than hurtful.
I think Heinen/DeBrusk will end up either on Krecji's left or Bergy's right depending on how camp goes. I brought DeBrusk up in this one as he's more of a pure scorer than Heinen, which is (I think) more helpful to Krecji. Heinen is the better overall prospect I feel, but ultimately I think DeBrusk serves better as Krecji's LW.
Czarnik I brought in at C purely as a quick switch from where Moore was. I think there will be some tinkering with who centers that line throughout the season, and I would be open to Nash centering it all year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 30, 2017 at 11:48 a.m.
Thread:
Offseason Mock
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bigbrit93</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bchapman88</b></div><div>Don't see that being enough for Scandella, especially considering Spooner really has no place on the Wild.
He doesn't fit their needs at all and is a really limited player. And the 2-2.5 he's likely to get eats into their cap savings from Scandella, which makes him even less valuable imo</div></div>
I had actually thought that after the expansion draft, and the Wild losing Haula and Tuch, they could do with forwards? I had seen mock's that had the Wild sending a pick back to the Bs, for one prospect and a mid round pick. So I felt two offensive young forwards could be enough value for him. I would still give up a potential 3rd or 4th if the Wild wanted it.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bchapman88</b></div><div>Don't see that being enough for Scandella, especially considering Spooner really has no place on the Wild.
He doesn't fit their needs at all and is a really limited player. And the 2-2.5 he's likely to get eats into their cap savings from Scandella, which makes him even less valuable imo</div></div>
And as I write that, Scandella has reportedly been traded to the Sabres haha. <a href="https://www.thescore.com/news/1326943" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.thescore.com/news/1326943</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 30, 2017 at 11:47 a.m.
Thread:
Offseason Mock
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bchapman88</b></div><div>Don't see that being enough for Scandella, especially considering Spooner really has no place on the Wild.
He doesn't fit their needs at all and is a really limited player. And the 2-2.5 he's likely to get eats into their cap savings from Scandella, which makes him even less valuable imo</div></div>
I had actually thought that after the expansion draft, and the Wild losing Haula and Tuch, they could do with forwards? I had seen mock's that had the Wild sending a pick back to the Bs, for one prospect and a mid round pick. So I felt two offensive young forwards could be enough value for him. I would still give up a potential 3rd or 4th if the Wild wanted it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 7, 2017 at 12:58 p.m.
Thread:
Different take of Krug-Landy
I agree with both of you, this isn't a trade I would want to happen by any means. This was just my take on a trade I saw in an earlier post, and how the B's could possibly cover their ass on the back-end if they went through with it. Zboril and the 1st would definitely be overkill in my opinion.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 1, 2017 at 11:25 a.m.
Thread:
Next season w/Muzzin and Draft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JP23</b></div><div>I like this scenario; only a few small, very arguable changes imo. I would bury Hayes in Providence, have Kuraly and Cehlárik to open with Boston, and swap Krug with Muzzin (i don't think Krug and McAvoy are good enough in their zone to be a permanent pair). I like the balance of youth and veterans on all 4 lines, and Foote would be a pretty ideal draft choice.</div></div>
I had Hayes up just as an NHL body. I would probably trade him for a late round pick this year or next, or as you said just bury him in Prov for the year. I debated putting Chara and McAvoy together, but I feel McAvoy will play 1st pairing minutes, and am unsure how 40 yo Chara will handle that. I was going to put Krug with Carlo as their games are very different that they would be productive. Carlo would stay put and cover for Krug while he runs up.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 4, 2017 at 12:47 p.m.
Thread:
Possible Hanafin deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>Krejci has a NMC and I doubt he waives to go to CAR. He's made it known he wants to retire as a Bruins and go back home after this contract is up.</div></div>
I know it's unlikely, but I think he brings the value they would want in return. I like him on the Bruins, especially when he's healthy, but Hanifin is a solid LHD that could play alongside Carlo/McAvoy for 10/15 years, so I would at least explore it if I were the B's front office.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 3, 2017 at 8:14 a.m.
Thread:
Offseason w/o Bjork Signing
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wabit</b></div><div>Wild pass. It's a here take our stuff for a top-4 d-man and a 3 time 20 goal scorer (who isn't even 25 yet) type of deal.
Take Nino out of the trade and make it Scandella for 1st or Zboril and it's better for the Wild.</div></div>
I think all those pieces would be more than just our "stuff". Zboril is a top LHD prospect, Kuraly proved he can play in the NHL on both the wing and center, and then Miller showed during the playoffs that he can step up and possibly handle a top-4 role full-time. All that and a first I feel is close to fair for Scandella and Nino.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2, 2017 at 11:18 a.m.
Thread:
Offseason moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>Love the idea of Fowler, but I think 1st + DeBrusk++ is a starting point for him.</div></div>
I was hoping they would look at Chiller's potential as well as Heinen's IQ as pluses, allowing the package to be a little light. I'd still feel comfortable giving them DeBrusk, a 1st, Spooner, and a little more if it meant getting Fowler (as long as he agrees to resign). I wouldn't dish all that out for just a year of him.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins_Fan_78</b></div><div>Pretty sure you'd have to give up RFA Rights/Draft Pick to get Vegas to take Beleskey. After this season Vegas will be taking K. Miller or McQuaid over any of the Bruins exposed forwards.</div></div>
Yeah I was doing this in the hopes they might look at him at think he could return to his old form. I'd give up a 2nd or 3rd to have Vegas take him.
First
2
3
4
Next
Page 3
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com