DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah Hockey Club
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah Hockey Club
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
cbreezy14
Member Since
Oct. 29, 2016
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
Forum Posts
199
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5, 2019 at 8:20 a.m.
Thread:
2 different picks in 2016 draft fix Canucks biggest issues going forward
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Fox was/is determined to go the "Vesey" route and be a UFA in August</div></div>
Fox is only a junior and will not be eligible to be a free agent and go the Vessey route until August 1 2020. So unless he really wants to choose his destination he will have to play another year at college
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5, 2019 at 6:51 a.m.
Thread:
2 different picks in 2016 draft fix Canucks biggest issues going forward
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Calgary and Carolina couldn't sign Fox, what makes you think the Canucks would be successful?</div></div>
What makes me think this is Fox wants to play in the NHL not be buried behind a deep d core and either be a healthy scratch or sent to the minors. I’m not going to list the d cores of Carolina and Calgary which are some of the better in the league.. Vancouvers defence is a dumpster fire and Fox would get to play a significant role so that’s what makes me think he would sign
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 14, 2019 at 2:48 p.m.
Thread:
Hayes and Karlsson
The value might be alright for a young talented offensive defenceman as the canucks d core is pathetic, but Vancouver is hosting the draft this year and Jim Benning has stated they wont be trading picks. Also acquiring Ghost blocks Quinn Hughes spot as an offensive left-handed D. So they would have to pass on this.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 11, 2019 at 9:39 p.m.
Thread:
Interesting hypothetical trade with Colorado Read description
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>Yeah pretty hard for Colorado to draft Hughes when he's getting drafted by Detroit with the #1 pick.</div></div>
Interesting I must have not have mentioned hypothetical in the post... or the title
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 11, 2019 at 9:36 p.m.
Thread:
Interesting hypothetical trade with Colorado Read description
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IAMAHOCKEYPLAYER69</b></div><div>Makar >>>>>>>>>>> Q Hughes and it isn't close either</div></div>
2017/2018: Makar 34 gp 5g 16a 21p/ Hughes 37 gp 5g 24a 29p. *WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS 10gp 2a
2018/2019: Makar 27gp 9g 22a 31p/ Hughes 25 gp 4g 25a 29p
Hughes is also a year younger. Based on the stats I would say between the two it’s actually pretty close bud
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 4, 2019 at 6:42 a.m.
Thread:
VAN Trade
Horvat will be Vancouver’s next captain so in no way will they trade him. However as for your trade proposal I think Kuokkanen is a nice prospect but if they were to entertain a deal Canucks would probably ask for Necas. Counter would be something along the lines of Horvat and Beagle for Hamilton, Rask retained and Necas. I don’t think Carolina would do that but might make it more enticing for Vancouver
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 15, 2018 at 7:46 a.m.
Thread:
Vancouver what you think of this deal?
At first I didn't like the deal as a Vancouver fan because the First round pick is so valuable to the rebuild. I think only way you make this move is if you are able to get the 10th from Edmonton with Lucic for Athensiou or another roster player not part of the core moving forward. If you are able to do that, I think Lucic would provide more to a young canucks team then Erikkson can, plus pick up an early second to move down 3 picks would be something Canucks could be interest in. However Edmonton deal would have to be agreed upon prior to signing off on Detroit deal.
Forum:
Mock-Draft
May 29, 2018 at 1:14 p.m.
Thread:
2018 NHL Mock Draft
Better cite Ben Kerr's descriptions
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 25, 2018 at 10:58 a.m.
Thread:
Your thoughts
Vancouver will ask for more as Tanev is one of their only trade chips for their rebuild. Toronto received 2 seconds at the 2016 deadline for Roman Polak and Nick Spalling, so a full year of Tanev is more valuable then both of those over a full year. Yes Tanev gets hurt often, but some of it is bad luck and could happen to anyone (Broken Jaw last year from a puck). If he is playing he would slot nicely on their first pair with Reilly. As for retaining.... Tanev already has a relatively low cap hit and is a good enough player to be moved without retaining unless other incentives are included. Vancouver is already retaining on Luongo so keeping two spots available to retain would be important for Vancouver when moving other pieces at the deadline to get better returns (Del Zotto, Edler, Gagner)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 25, 2018 at 10:46 a.m.
Thread:
Nichushkin Return, VAN trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jayjenkins</b></div><div>Do you think DAL wouldn't have to retain with just the 1st or would the 2nd have to be included?</div></div>
Personally I don't think the 2nd would have to be included for Vancouver to take on Spezza's full contract since they have cap room. I know Gurianov was a former first round pick and can see his stats online, however I do not have first hand knowledge on how Vancouver/ Dallas views him as a prospect anymore. I would look at the deal in two parts.. I think Gurianov, 13th overall and cap dump is more then fair value for Tanev... and most fans on this cite would say thats an overpay, although Jim Benning will be looking for a similar package to move Tanev. Essentially depends how high Dallas is on Nilson. If they are high on him then a second would be music to Vancouver's ears, but probably more realistically a 3rd or 4th.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 25, 2018 at 10:29 a.m.
Thread:
Nichushkin Return, VAN trade
Vancouver gladly accepts. Dallas wouldn't even have to retain any salary on Spezza with that package
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 14, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.
Thread:
North Dakota Magic
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>goodfoot64</b></div><div>That's a helluva lot to give up to take on 6 yrs of a horrible contract! In 2 yrs Chicago will be desperate to give Seabrook away.</div></div>
Yeah I figured Chicago fans would go crazy if they did not get enough return for Schmaltz. A 22 year old center with a 50 point year under his belt, plus he would already have chemistry with Boeser is why Van would give up so much. Vancouver could maybe take out one of Lind or Goldy. But Tanev, Granlund arent part of their future core. With Schmaltz that locks up Vancouver down the middle, so Petterson can stay on RW.. So with Boeser, Petterson and Virtanen not much room for Lind.. plus Jasek looked good during his AHL stint. I personally like Goldy and I think should be given more of an opportunity but I feel Green will never trust his defensive play so that makes him expendable.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>clark</b></div><div>hawks might do the deal, but why does Seabrook waive his mmc. don't tell me he lived in Vancouver half a life time in the past.</div></div>
This is hypothetical obviously Seabrook probably wont want to move his NMC clause, but if Chicago makes it known they do not want him anymore, or tell him he will start getting healthy scratched more regularly then that could convince him to waive. As for his hometown, yes he grew up there and that was a 'life time' in the past and Chicago is now his home... but he does spend some of his summers in BC and his family still lives out there, so you may think its crazy to think where you grow up means nothing anymore but it makes it more enticing then other places for him to waive his NMC. Seabrook's won 3 cups, so winning the cup probably isn't as important as other players who are still chasing their first. So going to a place where you can play in front of family and a team that will value and give him minutes he is accustomed too, I think its a pretty good fit as any if Chicago wants to get rid of his contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 10, 2018 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Realistic? TB/VAN
I think Vancouver would do that trade. Fills a need at Center and they don't have to spend in free agency and overpay Bozak or another vet to fill the void until they try to move Petterson from wing to center
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 7, 2018 at 9:44 a.m.
Thread:
no major moves
Vancouver would/should accept that deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 3, 2018 at 12:04 a.m.
Thread:
Trades with CAR/MTL. Thoughts?
Winnipeg is going to be good for a long time. Nice job moving out salary in order to pay Morrisey and Trouba properly. I think Stasny will be looking for one last pay day with term, but I completely agree with your thoughts and not give out longer then one year. With Mason, Stasny and Myers coming off the books the following year that will give them 16.1 million to lock up Liane, Connor and give wheeler a couple million for a raise. Chevy has done an amazing job putting this team together
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 2, 2018 at 9:47 a.m.
Thread:
Le Bleu Blanc Rouge
Vancouver accepts
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 1, 2018 at 10:51 a.m.
Thread:
Islanders, Hurricanes, and Washington Trades
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>joshelkin</b></div><div>Let me just say, as an Isles fan I would make that trade. However, Ladd has a full NMC and unless I'm missing something I don't think there's any way he would waive that to go to Vancouver.</div></div>
Ladd is from the greater Vancouver area so I could see it being a team where he would waive his no move clause for. Eriksson also has a NMC so he might be the one who wouldn't want to waive to go to the islanders. However, this is just hypothetical as both players could benefit from a change of scenery
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 23, 2018 at 1:46 p.m.
Thread:
Trades
Vancouver is in a rebuild so they will not be trading first and second round picks, especially in 2019 where they are hosting the draft. Spezza will potentially be bought out by Dallas, so any team could sign him without giving up a draft pick. However if Dallas ownership does not want to stomach a buyout then he could to be moved to a team with cap space (like Vancouver). However, in order to save Dallas from buying him out, Dallas will be including assets (pick or prospect) for Vancouver to take on the bad contract, not the other way around.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 19, 2018 at 2:59 p.m.
Thread:
Don Cherry's least favourite team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RC333</b></div><div>I exaggerated a lot to be far. By issue is that Horvat is proven in the nhl and seems like he's getting better. Necas is a great prospect but can he keep it going in the NHL? That's my only issue, cuz trading Horvat gets rid of our future captain and one important leader in the dressing room</div></div>
I Love Horvat and agree he should and will be the next captain. I am also Canadian and no way would I want a roster with no Canadians but this site is for fun so I was looking at things differently. Although, Horvat is Vancouver's #1 center and he is improving every year I believe his offensive ceiling wont get much higher then 60-70 points a year. With that said, dumping Sutter's cap hit and pick up Rask and Lindholm.. both who have had multiple years of 40 + points.. Necas who looks to be a very nice prospect, plus a first they could turn into Boquvist and fit into the whole theme of being Cherry's least favourite team.. why not
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 19, 2018 at 2:38 p.m.
Thread:
Don Cherry's least favourite team
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>alwaysnextyear</b></div><div>Cherry doesn't like Americans?</div></div>
Not as much as he likes good Canadian boys
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RC333</b></div><div>I stopped reading after that terrible first trade like wow.
But then I got curious and read on, wow why would u trade Stecher and Virtanen for nylander who's slumping in the AHL.
Stechers a top 4 guy and only getting better, and Virtanen looks like he might become the player we've hoped for</div></div>
What is the bad part of the first trade? From a Hurricanes or Canucks perspective?... and the idea is getting skilled Europeans.. and buying low on a young talented player who has a higher ceilling and who has good chemistry with Petterson at World Js
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 8, 2017 at 3:40 p.m.
Thread:
18/19 -- Draft Lotto Win and the Post-Sedin Era Begins
Eriksson's, Sutter's and Gagner's contracts and brutal and don't fit with the rebuild of the team. I am hoping they can move out some of these and clear room for the younger core moving forward. I would love to see Rodin fully healthy and have a chance to contribute this year as I think he could be really good. Also I think it is crucially important to handle Goldobin with care. I feel he isn't the kind of player Travis Green will trust and he might get burried down the line up or in the stands. I am fearful of his pulling a Tryamkin and heading to the KHL. Hopefully they understand how good he could be and he might have the highest skill level of all their prospects, so letting him be creative offensively and playing in the top 6 and on the pp would be crucial moving forward imo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 24, 2017 at 8:59 a.m.
Thread:
Edmonton Oilers opening night roster version 2
I know Van loves Stetcher and probably wouldnt want to move him, however I think they might bite on this move. Nice thoughts.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2017 at 1:46 p.m.
Thread:
Dallas Fans Thoughts?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>Dallas doesn't need any RHD they need LHD So Tanev to Dallas isn't happening.</div></div>
Dallas needs defence period. For someone who is a Detroit fan and witnessed what they did with 6 lefties that is a strange comment. Currently Dallas has..
Hamhuis LHD
Lindell LHD
Oleksiak LHD
Nemeth LHD
Klingberg RHD
Johns RHD
Honka RHD
Pattern RHD
That is a pretty even split for Righties and lefties. Dallas shouldn't be as concerned about what hand a dman shoot as much as best fit to their group. I think Tanev would be a great fit for the Stars and Hitchcock would love him. Dallas should be in a win now mode and although the 3rd is alot to give up, they get to dump a contract (yes I know they could buy him out) in turn they could buy out Lehtonen now and use his money to take a run at Oshie or whoever else they like. Plus a real quality dman, a young forward who scored 20 making less than 1 million plus a second. No it probably wont happen but something both teams should explore because it could help both teams
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2017 at 1:32 p.m.
Thread:
Dallas Fans Thoughts?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>alwaysnextyear</b></div><div>Canucks fan here, and I think that's a pretty fair offer. I'd even sub in the 33rd overall instead of the 55th if it meant the team could end up with the 3rd and 5th overall. I love the Makar selection, but I'd definitely pick Vilardi or Glass over Petterson.</div></div>
I think its a pretty fair offer. As a Van fan i would like to keep the 33rd overall as I think they could grab a good player who just dropped out of the first round.. however I guess depends how high they are on Makar if they think that highly of him than the 33rd could be switched. As for a play making centre at # 5.. Petterson, Glass and Vilardi would be my top 3. I like the idea of a right handed center to offset Horvat here forsure however I think Petterson might have the highest upside out of the 3 if Van is patient. I watched Glass live this year and Vilardi throughout the Mem Cup and both are very good players but there skating as of now doesn't scream # 1 centre in the future.. probably better suited as a really good # 2 center. Skating is something that can be improved as we don't have to look much further than Horvat.. but I just see them as really good # 2 centres. I personally have been really impressed with Horvats development but I still think once Vancouver has been fully rebuilt he would be a perfect number 2 centre. Also from what I have watched neither Glass or Vilardi seemed to have the half wall PP presence that Jim Benning is looking for. From everything I have watched (You should check out his highlights) and read on Petterson the only real knock on him is his slender frame. No real holes in his game plus can run a real efficient PP from the half wall. His numbers playing against men in the Sweden are real impressive especially when comparing previous draft eligible players that played in the same league. I think if properly developed he could be a future number one centre with a higher ceiling than the other two. Petterson also has chemistry with Dahlen who Vancouver is real high on and I think it would be pretty cool for Vancouver to pass the torch on from a Swedish center and left wing in the Sedins, to a Swedish Centre Petterson and Dahlen. But that is just one Canucks fan opinion haha
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 18, 2017 at 10:46 p.m.
Thread:
Vancouver GMs !! Are you down??
No Vancouver would not do that. Although from B.C. Price does not fit with Vancouver's rebuild and trading their #1 centre would set them back years. Price has not won a cup in Montreal so going to Vancouver to play behind an even worse team would result in Van not winning the cup but also not completely bottoming out and doing a full rebuild. If Price is dead set on only playing in Vancouver because he is from that province then he can come for free via free agency. Overall there really isn't a good fit between both Price and the Canucks at this point in Price's career and Vancouver's rebuild
First
2
3
4
Next
Page 3
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com