DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
dirtysaucedonny
dirtysaucedonny
Member Since
Feb. 7, 2018
Favourite Team
Ottawa Senators
Forum Posts
207
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 12:53 p.m.
Thread:
Torontreottawa Maple Canadors
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goldendelicious</b></div><div>Don't compare the stats of a rookie 19 year old defenceman who does not play an offensive style of game. Mete is better defensively, Gardiner is better offensively.</div></div>
I was using those stats to make a point. I think it's pretty evident who the better player is. Other stats:
TOI: Mete; 15:35, Gardiner; 22:32
+/-: Mete; +5, Gardiner +9
Their Corsi for percentage is almost identical as well (50.1 vs. 50.7).
You can break it down basically any way you would like, Gardiner is the better player and there's really no arguing that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 12:48 p.m.
Thread:
Torontreottawa Maple Canadors
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goldendelicious</b></div><div>Picking strictly LW...Marleau. But really any of Marleau, Brown, Hyman to fill that 4th line role.</div></div>
I guess it depends on how long this team is intended for. One game, I'd pick Marleau. This season, I'd pick Hyman. Anything more than that, I would pick Tkachuk without hesitation. There's no situation I would ever pick Brown over Tkachuk though.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 11:29 a.m.
Thread:
Torontreottawa Maple Canadors
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Goldendelicious</b></div><div>Having never played an NHL game, Tkachuk deserves no spot on this roster. Rielly is also the #1 LHD, not Chabot.</div></div>
Interested to know who you would take instead. I'd be really excited about Tkachuk on this team's fourth line, so much potential.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 11:28 a.m.
Thread:
Torontreottawa Maple Canadors
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dcc94</b></div><div>Mete doesn't go -4 in the deciding playoff game...prob cuz he hasn't made it that far but still...:)</div></div>
I'll take Gardiner in 88/89 games he played in this year over Mete. Gardiner obviously had one of the worst periods by a player of his caliber in a long time which may have cost his team the series, but you can't discount what he did the rest of the season because of it.
Mete: 49 GP, 0G, 7A, 7PTS
Gardiner: 82 GP, 5G, 47A, 52PTS
I don't think this should even be a discussion...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 11:09 a.m.
Thread:
Torontreottawa Maple Canadors
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dcc94</b></div><div>Mete and Petry over gard and Zaitsev</div></div>
Petry over Zaitsev maybe, but definitely not Mete over Gardiner. And I am not a fan of Gardiner.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 10:12 a.m.
Thread:
Trade With Ottawa
Pass from Ottawa. Dzingel is a really nice young player on the verge of a break out year and on a very affordable contract, with the next contract looking to be affordable as well. Definitely not something I'd be giving up for a mediocre D prospect and a mediocre FWD prospect.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 10:09 a.m.
Thread:
pac to islanders
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>linehan10</b></div><div>the trade wasnt made because wahlstrom and dobson fell to the picks the isles had and they didn't want to trade a first where they could get a legitimate future star for the aging once-star that is max pacioretty. also, tavares was on the team for literally 10 more days after the potential deal fell through. why would pacioretty go to that team then but not the team now? he knew what was probably gonna happen</div></div>
I know why the trade wasn't made, my question is why they wouldn't make it now? Your comment insinuates that it is Pacioretty that wouldn't want the trade to happen. I would argue it should be the Isles that don't want it to happen. As an Isles fan, would you really want Pacioretty for a year at that cost? I can't seem to wrap my head around why you would want that?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 9:27 a.m.
Thread:
Fun Friday
I would maybe give you Faulk by himself for that return. Nowhere close for both.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 9:05 a.m.
Thread:
3 way deal... does it work? OTT TOR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TotheNorth</b></div><div>It's actually 1 year @ 5.5M then 1 year of RFA with arb rights so 2 years control of Trouba. Gives them the ability to try and re-sign him after jan 1st for 1.5 years.</div></div>
Ok so with this in mind, WPG is still fleecing this deal, with TOR giving up way more and getting the weaker player. I just don't see how that happens? Why would TOR not just give up the same pieces and get a year of Karlsson, and then try the same thing you're suggesting they do with Trouba?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 9:02 a.m.
Thread:
pac to islanders
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kcoop821</b></div><div>Shaw is definitely worth a third round pick and a middle of the pack prospect. He is a stanley cup winner and a heart and soul grinder. Teams like San Jose that are going for a cup need players like shaw, they habs might even retain some salary.
The Islander need to compete this year, or risk losing their fan base all together. Lou needs to do whatever he can to make this team compete for a playoff spot, and they are not as bad as people might think. with pac on barzels left and eberle or lee on the right, you have a bonafide first line and a pretty decent 2nd line as well.</div></div>
You pick up Pacioretty and give up this much for him for one year, you still don't even make the playoffs. Goaltending is still a huge question mark, and they lost their first line C and didn't get anyone to replace him, and they didn't even make the playoffs when they had him. Complete waste of pieces for one year of Pacioretty when you won't make the playoffs.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 17, 2018 at 8:59 a.m.
Thread:
pac to islanders
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>linehan10</b></div><div>they had a trade/extension for pacioretty in place at the draft, so you don't know what you're talking about</div></div>
**At The draft- before Tavares left**
Also, not seeing on here where you indicate that there would be an extension in place...? Also, if I don't know what I'm talking about, why was the trade not made? Hmm..
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 15, 2018 at 3:57 p.m.
Thread:
3 way deal... does it work? OTT TOR
I don't understand how Toronto gives up the better assets and gets the weaker player? For WPG to only give up a 2nd, Trouba and Dano for Karlsson is outrageous. TOR giving up Kapanen and a 1st would be a bit of an overpayment for one year of Trouba, but if he was to come with an extension, TOR could throw in a 3rd or 4th and I think that's fair value
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 15, 2018 at 3:51 p.m.
Thread:
pac to islanders
Why would the Islanders ever make that trade? They're basement dwellers this year. Why give up young talent and a pick for an expiring contract who wouldn't resign? Also, Andrew Shaw coming off the year he just had is not worth that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 15, 2018 at 3:47 p.m.
Thread:
Cup Mode On
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>VeeMerk</b></div><div>WOAH relax there sir. I think it's safe to say that Stone will not resign in Ottawa next year. And where on earth do you think that Stone gets you Tkachuk? That's not saying Stone isn't a great player, cause he is... that just means that anybody would rather have Tkachuk over Stone. There's a pretty significant age difference, Tkchuck has better raw talent and the contract situation.
So in return you're getting a 1st, a solid former 1st round defender prospect and a cap dump that's UFA in 2 years. The 1st should be a 2019 but other than that, I can't see any teams beat that offer...</div></div>
It's nto "safe to say" Stone won't be back in Ottawa. If that were the case, he would already be gone. Secondly, there's no way I would ever take Matt Tkachuk over Stone. I'd gladly pay Stone what he's worth and keep him over Tkachuk. Stone is easily a top 10 RW in the league, Tkachuk is not. I think if Stone was considered a rental, the price would be high. Any team wanting to make a playoff push would easily offer up a young prospect and a first round pick. You want me to take an overpaid Frolik and get Stone in return for a playoff run, yeah i want more than Valimaki and a 1st. I'd look elsewhere if this was the return. A team like VGK or NSH would gladly give up a first round pick and high-end prospect for Stone, with probably a few other low end pieces. I could name 10 teams who would happily beat that offer for a year of Mark Stone.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 15, 2018 at 1:57 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Gards (get Karlsson for fun)
I'd never make that trade as CHI. I think they're a bottom 10 team this year, especially playing in the division that they do. Give up your best d prospect and an early first for a guy you will have for a year and then he walks? Or throw in a second and you keep a dman they can't afford and is very one-dimensional? Doesn't make sense to me.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 15, 2018 at 12:22 p.m.
Thread:
ANAHEIM DUCKS FANS - trade for Ritchie cost??
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ragsandbluesfan</b></div><div>Simon the buf 4th and the vgk 7th</div></div>
Yikes, I'd never pay that much for Ritchie. I'd give you a couple of picks (maybe a third & 4th or 2nd & 5th), or a mid level prospect and mid round pick. Although Ritchie is young, his upside is pretty limited.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 15, 2018 at 12:20 p.m.
Thread:
Interesting Thought
If this comes without a Stione extension, I love this deal as a Sens fan. However, I'd much rather re-sign Stone for 7 years than make this deal. OTT needs to evaluate whether a long term Stone deal can get done. If not, I love this idea.
Forum:
NHL Signings
Aug. 14, 2018 at 2:29 p.m.
Thread:
Ottawa Senators signed Brady Tkachuk (3 Years / $3,425,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mothariah</b></div><div>Why does everyone keep saying he is a lock to play in the NHL this season? The kid had 8 goals last year in college. EIGHT. I get he has other elements to his game, and I not doubting that he will be a good NHL player, but there is no reason to rush him to the NHL when this team is going to be dreadful.
Am I the only one who thinks it might be a good idea to NOT see him in the NHL in 2018-19? Let him tear it up in the OHL or AHL and then give him a spot on the top line when Stone leaves.
As someone who follows the NCAA college hockey scene closely, I don't see anything in his game that shouts "NHL Rookie of the Year" in 18-19.
I look at it, and I see Casey Mittelstadt might be a comparable, but he at least played his age 18-19 year in college, and scored 30 point in 34 games (Tkachuk had 31 in 40 games).
No offense, but it feels like you're asking Joshua Norris (19th overall in 2017 by San Jose) to come in and play in your middle six. That guy had eight goals last year, too, and NO ONE is talking about him playing in the AHL in 2018-19, let alone the NHL.
Or how about Montreal's Ryan Poehling, who had 14 goals and 31 points in 37 games at St. Cloud last year as a freshman. He's part of an organization that HAS NO CENETERMEN, and yet he still isn't an "NHL player."
(I know offensive numbers aren't everything).
Let the kid develop...</div></div>
You had me on board until the comparables. Those are not comparable players, and not comparable franchises. Mid first round picks are rarely, if ever expected to play in the AHL or NHL the year following being drafted. Top 5 picks are very frequently at least given the chance to show what they can do. The San Jose comparison is laughable, they're nowhere close to being as short on talent as Ottawa is. Conversely, MTL is almost in the same position as Ottawa, but Poehling and Tkachuk are extremely different players. Tkachuk is tough enough and skilled enough to play in the NHL right now. Not sayign he'd put up huge numbers, but somewhere in the 30-35 pts range would not be out of the question IMO.
Have to agree he's definitely not a lock in the NHL this year. To me, it's all about where he plays. If Ottawa keeps the trend of playing the young guys in bottom six roles, please God do not have Tkachuk in NHL. That would be an absolute waster. But, if he's consistently going to play beside Duchene or Stone in a top-six role, I'm all for it. He needs to be getting 15+ mins a night to make it worth him playing in the NHL. Personally, I'd love to see one of three things:
A) Plays his 9 games in the NHL to start the year, then goes and tears it up in London.
B) Plays until Christmas, goes to the WJC, and finishes the year in London
C) Play him in the NHL throughout the year, and if they ever want to play him in a bottom six role, send him down to play top minutes in the AHL.
I think he's ready to play now, but it has to be in the right circumstances.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10, 2018 at 3:28 p.m.
Thread:
Carolina on my mind
This is...... interesting. But I'd have to agree with the above comment, although I think Maata and Brassard would get you Teravainen value wise, just not what the Canes are looking for
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10, 2018 at 3:06 p.m.
Thread:
Nylander signs, noting Larkin's deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RC333</b></div><div>If Toronto can figure out they're cap situation by signing Matthews Nylander and marner for discounts and then fix their D they'll win the cup imo</div></div>
This has to be one of the biggest "ifs" in a while. That is A LOT of question marks. What qualify as "discounts"? Do you think all three plus an outsider defenceman all take "discounts"? I think you could probably take 10 teams in the NHL and do a "what if" scenario like this and say they will win the cup.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10, 2018 at 2:59 p.m.
Thread:
Full 23 man Roster if Z (LTI)Retires
This has to be the worst team in the NHL, VAN is a close 2nd and NYI not far behind either. Yikes.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 10, 2018 at 11:55 a.m.
Thread:
Hold my Beer (COL, VGK, MIN, ARI)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jwink19</b></div><div>Ottawa is NOT getting that first back.</div></div>
This is ridiculous. People are acting like there's nothing in the world they would take from OTT to give them their pick back. COL adds Stone and still has their own first round pick this year? Why wouldn't they do that?
Even if Ottawa is a dumpster fire this year and finish last in the league, there's an 81.5% chance they DON'T get the first overall pick. I just don't get how anybody thinks there's no way they get that pick back.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 9, 2018 at 11:03 a.m.
Thread:
I think these deals are fair for both teams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Davisoc</b></div><div>The issue is Ottawa is so desperate for change they want to make moves right now. The reality is there is so much value to be found on this team. If they just wait, they can speed up this rebuild a year or two. That does not mean this team will be compete ready in a year or two. What I mean is this: their rebuild looks like it will take 3-6 years at this rate. With patience I think it could be 2-4. They need to get a cool and sharp mind in that head office that doesn't mind ignoring the hate and be patient.</div></div>
Agreed completely. Look at what TBL got for being patient with Drouin, or what COL got for being patient with Duchene. Don't make moves just for the sake of making them. Honestly, I would be much happier watching Duchene walk at the end of the year and having him contribute to the Sens not getting that first overall pick, than trade him for far less than he's worth and watch the Sens sink to the bottom of the standings
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 9, 2018 at 10:49 a.m.
Thread:
Centers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I think he just isn't the right player to target. They should go after Duchene. They have many trade assets Remie/Robertson/Honka/Ritchie/Pitlick/Janmark/Shore/Faksa. They can use any 2 of those to get him and theyd have money to resign both Duchene and Seguin</div></div>
Only combination of players that get you Duchene out of that would be Honka and Faksa. Even then, you're throwing in at least a 2nd round pick. OTT just gave up a first, serviceable backup, the previous year's first rounder and a 2C for him. They're not downgrading with a better chance of giving up a really high pick this year unless enough value is coming back.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 9, 2018 at 10:44 a.m.
Thread:
I think these deals are fair for both teams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>I agree honestly but most people say we wont get more than that for upcoming UFAs and when u try including a sign and trade, they say those rarely happen and we cant include those to justify a trade with a huge return lol</div></div>
Agreed, but the track record just doesn't prove that. Look what the Canes just got for Jeff Skinner. He's not as valuable as Stone and Karlsson is on another planet value wise. To me, rentals are far more valuable than most people are giving them credit for, to the right team. Teams like Tampa, Boston, Pittsburgh, Columbus, I could see all being very interested in a rental of that value. You only have to worry about fitting them into the cap for a year, plus they give you a huge boost for a Cup run. Not saying they get exactly what they're asking for right now, but if the Sens get to the deadline clearly out of it, and haven't signed Karlsson, Duchene and Stione, I would be willing to bet all 3 get traded for more than this. At least a first round pick coming back for each, plus prospects of course. Just look at what NYR got for RICK NASH last year at the deadline.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>VeeMerk</b></div><div>Some of the trades I can see happening for sure, but in terms of Stone, I think Ottawa doesn't have the bargaining power here. Stone is gonna be a UFA so I doubt a team will pay storng futures for it, like in your Vegas deal. I think Tuch is the deal breaker there. You could probably get him as part of a Karlsson deal but I don't think Stone will get that big of a return (assuming its a 1st btw).
Trust me I understand your pain because as a Habs fan, we're going through similr issues with Patches! Personally I want to sign him but in terms of trade, we're in a pickle</div></div>
This is kind of contradictory; you say that teams aren't willing to part with strong prospects for rentals, but then go on to say that you assume it's a first round pick, which in this scenario, would only be a first if Stone was NOT a rental. Either way, if Vegas is in contention at the deadline and wants to make a push, I have 0 doubt they would make this trade. I could find you 3 Alex Tuch's in every team's system. I could probably find you 3 Mark Stone's in the entire NHL. This is a very fair deal for VGK. Wouldn't excited about that return for Stone, would love that return for Duchene. Stone is way too important to this franchise at a crumbling point to only get a few pieces back.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Davisoc</b></div><div>Best move for Ottawa is to forget preseason trading. Be patient, sit down with your top guys and tell them to put up the best season they have and they'll get moved to a great contender at the TDL. The return you could get for a rental on Karlsson/Duchene/Anderson at the TDL would be SILLY!</div></div>
This. This is the type of thinking the Sens so desperately need right now. Personally, I'd start the season with all of them, and see where it goes. Sign Stone to a long-term extension by January. Sell Duchene/Karlsson at the deadline. Only question mark for me is Anderson. Maybe he has a great start to the year and his value increases. But with what the Sens look like on paper, keeping him until the deadline might plummet his stock. I'd wait for a team to lose a goalie to injury for a month. That's when you get max value for him, not right now.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com