DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
futurehofer
Minnesota Wild
Member Since
Oct. 13, 2016
Favourite Team
Minnesota Wild
Forum Posts
989
Posts per Day
0.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 4:10 a.m.
Thread:
Wildcard 2025
Why would the Wild do this? If we were to trade our 1st, it would be for somebody that can help us now. And quality before quantity.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 7:20 p.m.
Thread:
Wildcard 2025
Minnesota isn't trading you the 13th overall draft pick in return for two bottom-pairing defensemen and a pick in the late 50's. Don't you think that they'd rather have Greentree or Hage themselves instead of that package? (And that assumes that all of Parekh, Silayev and Yakemchuk and the most highly-rated European forwards are all off the board, too.)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 3:54 p.m.
Thread:
Habs Off-season
Wild decline. You clearly don't want Rossi enough, considering your protection on that pick.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Sun. at 4:08 p.m.
Thread:
JUL1
You think Gallagher has value??? You would need to pay Minnesota a lot to take that contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 8:40 p.m.
Thread:
Wild
I seriously wouldn't consider trading Mojo straight up for PLD. And that's WITH retention on PLD. That's how much I hate the idea of it.
There's literally no chance I give either Rossi (not even in the worst Armageddon imaginable would I consider this) or Gustavsson (same deal) in a PLD swap.
As you correctly stated, he's a malcontent, one that Minnesota should never consider or be brought up again.
Furthermore, Rossi is literally PLD, but with a team first attitude and an actual NHL caliber work ethic. It's on par with JEE's really. The F*** are you moving him for that malcontent for?
The only way I could ever stomach this is if we got him fully retained, plus their next two 1st's, for Merrill.
Unreasonable and Unrealistic, I know. But that's how I feel.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Mon. at 4:40 a.m.
Thread:
Kent Johnson
Doubt Matheson gets you the #13 OA pick. Minnesota's blueline is pretty much set, it's forwards they need.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 2 at 1:58 p.m.
Thread:
next years team
Do you seriously believe that Minnesota will trade you their 21 year old Calder nominee right handed defenseman and a 30-goal scoring two-way forward on the right side of 30 for a B-prospect, a first-round bust, and a late first? This is un-precedented levels of delusion
Forum:
NHL Trades
Mar. 7 at 2:18 p.m.
Thread:
(MIN/COL) - Duhaime for 2026 3rd (COL)
I like this for the Avs. Duhaime will fit in nice on their 4th line in exchange for a pick that MIGHT sniff the NHL in 2029.
RIP the Canucks ACGMs saying Duhaime is worth a 6th or a 7th.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 8:09 p.m.
Thread:
tdl24
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>simsauce</b></div><div>lol its Pat Maroon. They get 3 equivalent 1st's. Say thank you & move along</div></div>
First of all you're not offering three firsts, you're offering one first, three drafts from now, and a former late 1st whose value has plummeted since the draft, almost three years ago. Second, the problem isn't moving Maroon, it's taking on Campbell, who costs much more to dump, when we already have two NHL goalies in Gustavsson and Fleury, and arguably the best goalie prospect in the world in Wallstedt.
Go ahead and buy Campbell out yourself if it's such a reasonable rate.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 1 at 2:27 a.m.
Thread:
What would these guys cost and are they available
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>futurehofer</b></div><div>First, he's at 19:57 with zero PP time so it's not like we're talking about someone getting 16 minutes. Second, he has another year left on a cheap contact when we still have one more year of cap hell left. We have no need to trade him so it will likely take somewhat of an overpayment to get him. To replace him in the lineup will likely cost us more so we would need a decent incentive to make our already complicated cap situation even worse.</div></div>
He also balances the top four very well, playing well with Faber so Brodin can anchor his own pairing. And he brings size and physicality on the back end, which is something we don't have much of. Overall solid, if unspectacular, top 4 guy signed cheap for one more year with very little reason to move him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 6:38 p.m.
Thread:
Youth movement
You're not getting anything even remotely close to Yurov for Cody Glass. You are incredibly far off.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 21 at 9:32 p.m.
Thread:
Trade deadline
Sometimes I think Leafs fans think the rest of the league is just there for Toronto's benefit
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12 at 11:41 p.m.
Thread:
Two tanks on D
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>A 1st for Bogosian is wild</div></div>
I've seen your threads, you have no room to talk
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 11 at 4:23 p.m.
Thread:
Flower
Wild decline, Leafs fans please understand no one values your spare parts as much as you do, even if you think they're good, teams want pieces they value, not the pieces you think they should value
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 6:54 p.m.
Thread:
just ran a draft lottery simulator
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac555</b></div><div>7 x $8m</div></div>
And JEE's literal current MARKET VALUE is $8.3M, but is only getting paid $5.25M for the next SIX YEARS.
His value is far and away the better of the two.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 3 at 1:43 p.m.
Thread:
My take 7
You think Mittelstadt and a no value cap dump get you a top ten pick? Worse, our top ten pick this year plus our 2nd rounders for both this year's draft and next year's.
Do you honestly think Minnesota, who's in the bottom 10 of the league this year is going to wait until the 3rd round to make a selection in this year's draft?
They also already have Rossi and JEE in their top-six. So Mitts is playing 3C in Minnesota. Why would we pay that for someone who's going to cost more than we can afford, only to stick him into a 3rd line checking role?
Try and think about other teams situations and needs when making posts. It'll go a lot better for you in the future.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 2:39 a.m.
Thread:
Lets goooo
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>Wild accept easily</div></div>
Wild decline easily. You are giving a late 1st, a few meh prospects and some spare parts nobody wants. For a premium 2C. Give your head a shake.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 2:26 p.m.
Thread:
Treliving Reunites Crosby Letang And Fleury
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingExLeafs</b></div><div>There isn't much difference between a 2nd and a 3rd and a 4th. </div></div>
Yes there is
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 12:11 a.m.
Thread:
New regime
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ImACashew10</b></div><div>A-level sounds like a stretch. Danila Yurov, A-level for sure and a nonstarter. You’ve already got one undersized center in Rossi plus Ek and Hartman signed to term. Plus grossly overestimating the value of Khusnutdinov. Risto has warts but you can’t trade a bag of chips for a legit top 4 RD.</div></div>
Yeah, and neither Rossi or Khusnutdinov play soft hockey just because they're under 6' feet. So that doesn't wash... and is an extremely tired narrative BTW. Both of them play extremely sound defensive hockey in their own ends. All while being incredibly hard to knock off the puck. And while being under the vaunted 6 foot mark.
The old addage that small players need to be either fast or have high hockey IQ's to make it argument falls flat too. Rossi has the high IQ to be a top 6 center, while Khusnutdinov has the speed (He’s easily around a Brayden Point level foot speed). Khusnutdinov is absolutely considered an A-level prospect, he was an expected 1st round pick on talent alone during his draft year, but only fell into the 2nd because of the whole Russian factor. That's not his fault. Nor should it diminish his perceived value either.
Hartman can and does play all foward positions, and is easily put back onto the wing if necessary. That's an non-issue.
Joel Eriksson-Ek is a legitimate 2C, sure. But he's elite whenever he's deployed in a checking 3C role. So him bumping down to the 3rd line just increases our center depth even more.
Or Khusnutdinov can play there, because again, that's a non-issue. Or maybe he's moved to the wing and becomes our 2LW of the future.
If your argument is that Minnesota can't compete with two undersized centers in their top six. The obvious counter argument to that is to stick at least one player of size onto their wings. Say a Matt Boldy or Liam Öhgren type of player.
Finally, saying Risto is a legitimate top-four defenseman is being extremely generous. He's barely a serviceable #4D. All while being a defensive black hole. Can anyone say Matt Dumba. He's a least familiar with the organization and the team loves him. And he's going to cost a damn site less than this.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 4:25 p.m.
Thread:
No end in sight
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sabresguy1987</b></div><div>whys that exactly? outpacing production and younger, i get the defensive game may be better with JEK but hence why I added the 2nd</div></div>
U sound totally absurd with that reasoning
Mitts next contract will be a few mil bigger also
Plus Ek is the better player right now
I’m a Sabres fan,
but i agree there’s no way Minny makes that deal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 3:20 p.m.
Thread:
No end in sight
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Sabresguy1987</b></div><div>whys that exactly? outpacing production and younger, i get the defensive game may be better with JEK but hence why I added the 2nd</div></div>
Outproducing? By 1 point? That's not outproducing, that's potentially one game from Ek being ahead by 1 point. And Ek has 8 more goals. Ek is also miles better defensively, not to mention the grit and physical play he brings. Ek is also signed for 5 more years at a very good contract, where Mittelstadt't $ value is unknown, and will probably be higher than Ek's. Ek being two years older and including a 2nd round pick two drafts from now doesn't come close to offsetting the value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 16 at 12:08 p.m.
Thread:
Yaw or Naw
You guys need to understand, when you offer pieces like Robertson or Timmins, or Bracco in the past, or whoever else fits the bill, these guys have virtually no value.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 4, 2023 at 8:14 p.m.
Thread:
Would cost a lot but would be great if they are sellers
I know Sens management is kind of a mess right now but I can't imagine that they would turn around and move Chychrun 9 months after they acquired for him for a package that doesn't blow what they paid out of the water - keep in mind, they gave up what wound up being #12OA, plus a 2024 2nd and a 2026 2nd for him last March. Lagesson is just a warm body, so you're basically offering #28 in the same draft they gave up the #12 in plus a 2024 1st that is most likely in the same vicinity - I just don't think it would be enough of a slam dunk for the Senators to take it.
As far as the Wild trade, I think they pass. They're literally dollar in/dollar out at this point, and this trade has them sending out $1.65M in AAV while taking back $2.45M. For a team with less than $56K in cap space, you're basically taking away an entire roster spot here. Not to mention the fact that Reaves is pretty much a one note player at this stage of his career, while Maroon is providing some of that snarl while also scoring at a 40 point pace on his $800K cap hit. Easy pass for the Wild.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 4, 2023 at 8:01 p.m.
Thread:
Would cost a lot but would be great if they are sellers
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lightman13</b></div><div>It was someone else on capfriendly. I bet they might take him at 50% retention. But that’s about it.</div></div>
Incidentally league min is where maroon stands and is a much better fit skill wise, so I’m sure they’d keep him…. Reaves being a no skill guy.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 4, 2023 at 7:03 p.m.
Thread:
Would cost a lot but would be great if they are sellers
The Wild wanted Reaves back last summer, but guessing they were only offering closer league minimum so don't think they'd want him at his full cap hit. Not sure where this "rumor" got started that they wanted him back.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com