DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
hairyberry
Member Since
Sep. 3, 2020
Favourite Team
Boston Bruins
Forum Posts
447
Posts per Day
0.3
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 12:57 p.m.
Thread:
welp so long hanifin
TBH I think it's a good thing we're not getting Hanifin at 8x$7m+. Lohrei will be a mainstay in the top 4 very soon and Lindholm is still a good top 4 D despite having a down year and could bounce back next season. He was playing fantastically well last year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 12:55 p.m.
Thread:
top 6 or minors poitras
3C with as many shifts as possible next to Marchand thrown in too.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Tue. at 12:54 p.m.
Thread:
Can they really beat Tampa
The whole series hinges on Boston's top defencemen shutting down Kucherov imo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 12:53 p.m.
Thread:
where linus might end up
I'd rather keep Ullmark at those prices. He gets no respect for some reason despite consistently putting up very good numbers across several seasons and teams.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 6 at 6:53 p.m.
Thread:
Quinton Byfield
Am I missing some Byfield news or something? Why is in so many mock trades all of a sudden?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3 at 4:14 p.m.
Thread:
shaking things up but not really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>It doesn’t matter in this case. If the return is middling picks, I’m keeping him and letting the successful goalie rotation continue. His value to winning is higher than a late second round pick and other secondary assets.
I don’t even bring this deal to my leadership team to discuss unless I’ve gotten indications that both Lindholm and Hanifin want to sign</div></div>
100% agreed, only way I consider this deal is if we are in a situation where we have a near-guarantee that a high-end UFA will sign with us *and* we wouldn't have the cap space to get that player otherwise. But even then that's not a great excuse to get a poor return.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3 at 4:11 p.m.
Thread:
to the playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stadel</b></div><div>The second one, and its not to say they dont need veteran help. Its that they shouldnt be seeking players out simply because they are veterans. That doesn't matter if the player is no good.
They need good veterans, but good veterans aren't signing or waiving for Buffalo. So the next best option is to just ice the best team you can and be patient. Because the more they try to double down on cycling through guys like Lyubushkin and Johnson, the further they actually delay success.
If you look at the wins above replacement values for sabres skaters over the last few years, its almost always these "leadership" guys who are at the bottom. What do I care what EJ says in the locker room if he cant play?</div></div>
Yes I agree with all of this. They need someone who can play in the top 6/top 4 who has been in the playoffs several times. For example in this year's FA crop Stephenson, Marchessault, Pavelski, Guentzel could all fit that bill. But like you said, none of them are signing with Buffalo lol so it's a moot point.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3 at 4:06 p.m.
Thread:
shaking things up but not really
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Goalie primes are generally their late 20s.</div></div>
For truly high-end goalies their prime typically starts in their late 20s and go until 33-34. Just my anecdotal opinion, don't have any statistical analysis to back that up. Regardless, there has been no evidence of Ullmark in particular slowing down
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3 at 4:04 p.m.
Thread:
to the playoffs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stadel</b></div><div>Erik Johnson was a triumphant success.</div></div>
Are you trying to say because EJ wasn't a fit that Adams is a bad GM? Or are you saying that it proves they don't need veteran help? Either way I disagree
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3 at 4:00 p.m.
Thread:
shaking things up but not really
Would rather just keep Ullmark if that's the return. People forget he's one of the best goalies in the NHL and one season removed from a Vezina. He's right in his prime (which is typically later for goalies), and has consistently put up elite numbers on multiple teams. It's so rare for a goalie to put up the numbers he does without ever having a down year. If we're trading him to NJD it has to be a 1st+, or Mercer/Holtz involved, depending how the Bruins view those players.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 3 at 3:58 p.m.
Thread:
to the playoffs
The Sabres are weird because individually the players are all so good. Even the defence... Maybe it's a "team defence" issue? Maybe they need some older veteran players? I don't know anymore. But I've been a huge KA advocate since day 1 and I believe he will achieve long-term success, progress isn't always linear.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 2 at 9:00 a.m.
Thread:
Galaxy Brain
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Do you think Colorado can afford rantanens extension?
How many teams can afford him?
How many teams can afford him while also having assets like a top 10 pick AND a prospect of Kulichs caliber, and Johnson who slots into your defense immediately on an ELC AND whose cap back to you is a 30 goal scorer?
If buffalo wins a round you get another 1st too
I obviously make assumptions here, but when I ask those questions no one answers.</div></div>
I can answer those questions right now:
1) Yes, easily. He's up in 2025, at which point they will have approximately $34m in cap space (if they don't sign anyone from today until then). So if the GM isn't a complete moron, he will plan all of his signings appropriately to ensure he can afford the extension when the time comes.
2) That is irrelevant from the Avs' perspective when they're considering of the value of the return. It only becomes relevant if they want to trade Rantanen and create a bidding war, but they definitely don't want to do that.
3) See 2. Also, a #6D and a $7.5m 31 year old winger (32 next month) who averaged a 68 point pace over the last 3 years and is locked up for another 3 years after this one has very low trade value, if any at all. The only high-end assets are Kulich and 9OA, but you're offering 4 quarters for a dollar in a sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 2 at 8:42 a.m.
Thread:
Galaxy Brain
Avs decline, why would they do that?
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Mar. 21 at 1:39 p.m.
Thread:
Next year
Tanev is an okay player but his cap hit is way too high for his production. I'd say that's a pretty paltry return for one of the best goalies in the league, I'd want at least a 1st. Also Brodie has been pretty bad in Toronto this year from what I hear
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 12 at 8:45 a.m.
Thread:
Sabres offseason
Honestly after that Byram powerplay clip that went viral, I kind of wonder if the Sabres' problems are deeper than roster construction...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 7 at 2:59 p.m.
Thread:
sweeney swings for the fence to save his job
Huge overpay for Leddy and Huge underpay for Lindholm
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:50 p.m.
Thread:
2024 TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Logicalicesports</b></div><div>Why is everyone trying to trade for Tuch, didn't they come out and say he is one of the untouchables in Buffalo</div></div>
It's because Friedman said Boston called about him. Which doesn't mean he's available (he almost certainly isn't).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:42 p.m.
Thread:
Sweeney type targets
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>What would you pay for Mittelstadt. Every time I ask a Sabre fan, they say Carlo. It sounds like Buffalo doesn’t want to pay him the contract necessary.
I’d start with Lysell, cap filler, and a 2025 #1 if that’s a possibility.</div></div>
Yeah Carlo is just a firm no, we'd be filling one hole and making another. I wouldn't touch the 2025 first, there's way too high of a probability we could be ass next year and then suddenly we're in a sens/sharks type situation where we accidentally gave up a top 5 pick. Lysell probably isn't interesting to the Sabres, given their glut of young forwards.
I think the only way that deal might make sense for both sides is if it's a 3 team trade, where we trade Ullmark to Team X, Buffalo trades Mittelstadt to us, and Team X trades something the Sabres actually want to the Sabres.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:37 p.m.
Thread:
Sweeney type targets
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Celtics21</b></div><div>But none of those guys had term when he acquired them.</div></div>
Yeah that's what I meant, he acquires guys that he can keep around in general, either because they have term already or he believes he can extend them.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:12 p.m.
Thread:
Sweeney type targets
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>i think people make too much of sweeney looking for guys he can get for multiple years.</div></div>
You mentioned Zacha and Coyle but forgot about Hall, Lindholm, Lazar, Reilly, Kase, Ritchie... If you look at his trade history, most of his trade acquisitions have played more than one season for us. Ullmark wasn't a trade acquisition so he doesn't really count towards this exercise one way or the other.
Last year was an exception because it was a clear "all-in" season, everyone knew we couldn't keep anyone we traded for but it was worth a shot anyway. In normal circumstances he definitely prefers to acquire guys he can keep for more than one season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5 at 1:00 p.m.
Thread:
Sweeney type targets
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dons_weeney</b></div><div>I've been kicking tires on some of these</div></div>
Good to know Mr. Weeney thank you!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 14 at 2:24 p.m.
Thread:
Zegras
Easy no from the Ducks. Gustafsson and Kupari will at best be bottom 6 forwards, and a 3rd doesn't add much. So it's basically Lambert and scraps for Zegras, and Lambert isn't enough of a sure thing to justify him being the main part of the return
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 6 at 1:43 p.m.
Thread:
Grier you have to commit to the tank - please
Having 4 firsts is a little video game-y, but in principle I don't see why it couldn't happen. Pretty solid deals imo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 2:27 p.m.
Thread:
plug a hole in the top 6
Huge no from Bs perspective imo. Tarasenko is awful defensively and wouldn't fit in well with the Bruins. I honestly would hesitate to pay a 2nd, let alone a 1st, a 4th, and a prospect. Plus having to trade Gryz who pairs so nicely with McAvoy just to acquire his cap hit? Just doesn't make sense to me.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 25 at 2:01 p.m.
Thread:
Bruins
Oilers wouldn't give up that much for Ullmark. Maybe 1 for 1 for RNH but even then I would think the Bruins are the ones adding just because RNH is a centre and Ullmark is a goalie
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com