DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
hockey216
Member Since
Feb. 21, 2019
Favourite Team
Buffalo Sabres
2nd Favourite Team
Columbus Blue Jackets
Forum Posts
77
Posts per Day
0.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 14, 2023 at 2:29 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>Buffalo has zero interest in Morgan rielly. Try another team that doesn't have 3 stud LHD all 24 and younger</div></div>
Dahlin and Power can both play the right side and while I don’t love Reilly’s term or cap hit, a good veteran character D that can help those guys along I would think would interest the Sabres.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 14, 2023 at 2:24 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Guys who have only one or two seasons left on their contract aren't what we're looking for; the only Maple Leaf for whom Los Angeles has any desire is Morgan Rielly. And you have to take back at least $5 million in cap, so the likelihood of any significant deal between the teams is small.</div></div>
Nylander would have been the kings leading scorer last year, Nylander is exactly what they need upfront.
Forum:
NHL Signings
Sep. 20, 2022 at 2:52 p.m.
Thread:
Colorado Avalanche signed Nathan MacKinnon (8 Years / $12,600,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CD282</b></div><div>I agree. They lost several significant players this summer and this contract doesn't start for another year. More shoes to drop.
Toews & Kane won 3 Cups, but since their big $10.5M deals kicked in they haven't won a single playoff round.
Unless the talent is transcendent, it can't overcome the lack of team depth resulting from massive legacy contracts in the cap era.</div></div>
1,000%, I can all kinds of hate whenever I point that out from fans but it is the truth. It is incredibly hard to win paying multiple players $10,000,000 and up annually.
Forum:
NHL Signings
Sep. 20, 2022 at 2:49 p.m.
Thread:
Colorado Avalanche signed Nathan MacKinnon (8 Years / $12,600,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div><div>As soon as he won his cup I knew he wasnt making less than McDavid
As for record breaking contract it holds till AM 16mill x 8 year deal and than whenever Draisaitl gets grabbed via FA</div></div>
He did though, McDavids CH% is 16.67%, Nate's is 15.27%, he actual did to a little bit of a discount.
The back couple years of this contract could be rough, $12.6 milly cap hit in years 7 & 8 maybe brutal. You had to sign in but this maybe a tough one down the road.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 5, 2021 at 11:04 p.m.
Thread:
Eichel Deal to VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabres89</b></div><div>Nobody ever has trouble getting to the floor. Plus with an eichel trade most likely coming, the sabres will be taking back salary, whether its a steaming cap dump or a marginally useful vet that can be spun retained for assets is the question. I wonder if dubnyk at 3 million at the deadline has any value.</div></div>
$60.5 million is the floor, take away the Dubnyk contract and they are right at the floor.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 5, 2021 at 11:03 p.m.
Thread:
Eichel Deal to VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pensfan89</b></div><div>Reilly smith isn’t really an upgrade at wing though. He’s a lateral move at best. Had exactly the same type of year Zucker had. I’d rather just trade Zucker for Reilly straight up with vegas which was a rumor at one point. The pens would get 500k cap space this year, 5.5 mil next year. The pens don’t need cap space this year. Their whole team is signed. They ain’t signing anyone else lol. This is their team.</div></div>
Reilly Smith is an upgrade over Zucker for sure. My proposal has the Sabres eating half Smith's salary this year ($2,500,000) which frees up $3,000,000 in cap space this year and the only $5,500,000 next year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 5, 2021 at 6:43 p.m.
Thread:
Eichel Deal to VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pensfan89</b></div><div>Pens decline. They don’t really need retention on smith if it’s gonna cost a 1st rounder. I doubt Zucker would waive for Buffalo anyways.</div></div>
A first to upgrade at wing and free themselves of $3,000,000 in cap this season and $5,500,000 next season is relatively cheap. They are in their window now, they aren't going to care a bout a late 1st rounder they maybe a player in 5 years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 5, 2021 at 6:40 p.m.
Thread:
Eichel Deal to VGK
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sabres89</b></div><div>I saw that friedman said it wasnt true. Since that rumor came out, everybody is trying to post their comparables to a trade rumor that wasnt true. And for dubnyk, adams hasnt overpaid for a goalie YET, so im hoping he knows better, although i thought boston overpaid for ullmark (minimally in term) and apparently he took the same deal from boston that buffalo offered him- so maybe dubnyk at 6 isnt all that far fetched.</div></div>
Sabres are going to need to get to the floor and a one year deal on an experienced goalie they can flip at the deadline maybe their only option.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Aug. 5, 2021 at 2:14 p.m.
Thread:
Get it done take II
Zero percent chance the Sabres retain a penny of Eichel's salary.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2021 at 11:17 p.m.
Thread:
Jack Eichel to CBJ Sleeper Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MJCrv</b></div><div>I don’t the think the Sabres would be interested in marchenko. They have no scouts in Russia, no Russian players on the roster, and not 1 Russian prospect in the system. They’ve been staying away. I’m guessing to avoid the kaprizov situation.</div></div>
That’s fair and a good point. Hard to find a decent prospect in CBJ system though that seems like they have potential while also in an area of depth for CBJ.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 20, 2021 at 11:16 p.m.
Thread:
Jack Eichel to CBJ Sleeper Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>If the best offer a buffalo gets is a first round pick in a weak draft, and otherwise spare parts then Jack Eichel can kick rocks until a better offer comes along. Contrary to popular belief the Sabres are under no obligation to trade Jack Eichel for anything less than his worth. Which means maybe he starts the season in Buffalo until his value is reflected in the better trade offer they should be getting.</div></div>
Bjorkstrand is hardly spare parts, he is a legit top 6 winger under a somewhat reasonable contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 12, 2021 at 12:20 p.m.
Thread:
Eichel Trade to CBJ
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tjm220</b></div><div>The CBA does not permit conditions on trades involving whether or not a player re-signs.</div></div>
You might want to go look at that Feb 2019 trade for Matt Duchene, CBJ and OTT. There was absolutely a conditional first round pick based on Duchene resigning in Columbus.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 5, 2021 at 3:19 p.m.
Thread:
Next year sharks
The Sabres have enough terrible contracts, why would they want to add Martins and pay a Second rounder to boot. Merkley isn't that much of a sweetener!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 18, 2019 at 5:55 p.m.
Thread:
Laine Trade Would WPG make this trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aedoran</b></div><div>I do think Werenski for Laine is pretty even.</div></div>
Not even close, Werenski is an elite top 2 d pairing guy. Ducks just fetched a first and top level prospect for Montour last Feb. Werenski is worth at least that if not more. Hard to see CBJ giving up Werenski for Laine.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sep. 18, 2019 at 5:52 p.m.
Thread:
Laine Trade Would WPG make this trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kingtrader</b></div><div>Never.. even if the 1st is gonna be a top 5 I think .. but WPG can have way but WAY better then this</div></div>
He is an offensive talent, but he is a liability in his own zone, is immature and streaky. I don’t think there is going to be a line to try and acquire him, particularly with him needing a contract that is roughly $7,000,000 per. Again though I still don’t think he is traded as his value is low right now.
Forum:
NHL Signings
Jul. 19, 2019 at 5:15 p.m.
Thread:
New York Rangers signed Jacob Trouba (7 Years / $8,000,000 AAV)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DDoverChucky</b></div><div>A top pairing defensemen in his prime should get this 100%. I don't get why people are upset about this contract. The cap has gone up over the years. It's a great deal IMO</div></div>
Only problem is Trouba isn’t a top pairing defenseman!
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DDoverChucky</b></div><div>A top pairing defensemen in his prime should get this 100%. I don't get why people are upset about this contract. The cap has gone up over the years. It's a great deal IMO</div></div>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 15, 2019 at 12:42 p.m.
Thread:
Offer sheeting Marner - theyll finally notice that they made a mistake
I wouldn't worry about a Marner offer sheet, no team is going to fork over the 4 1st's without getting the 7 year term, it is been widely reported Marner (much like Aho) wants 5 years or less term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 28, 2019 at 5:24 p.m.
Thread:
Luo gone
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_27</b></div><div>You can't pin it all on goalies. San Jose and Calgary had terrible goaltending last year.. look where they were. Playoffs.</div></div>
SJS and CGY were #1 and #2 for shots against last year. They could cover up poor goal tending with outstanding D.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 28, 2019 at 5:22 p.m.
Thread:
Luo gone
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hockey216</b></div><div>Again that defense was 10th in shots against last year. Avg save percentage in NHL hoovers around .910, Florida was at .891 last year, if they get league average goaltending @ .910 save % that takes 46 goals against off the board, you don't think that jumps them atleast 12 points??? (They finished with 86 points last year and 12 points out of the final playoff spot).</div></div>
Furthermore Bob was at .913 LY, .921 the year before and .931 the year before that. If they get Bob to tie a carrer high at .931 in 16-17 that would shace 99 goals against than your talking cup contenders.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 28, 2019 at 5:18 p.m.
Thread:
Luo gone
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_27</b></div><div>With that defence, they don't even get in a stretch fight for a playoff spot</div></div>
Again that defense was 10th in shots against last year. Avg save percentage in NHL hoovers around .910, Florida was at .891 last year, if they get league average goaltending @ .910 save % that takes 46 goals against off the board, you don't think that jumps them atleast 12 points??? (They finished with 86 points last year and 12 points out of the final playoff spot).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:39 p.m.
Thread:
Luo gone
Florida Panthers last year
Goals For 9th in NHL
Goals Against 28th in NHL
Shots Against 10th in NHL
Again I love Lou and Reims but they had goaltending problems last year!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 26, 2019 at 3:36 p.m.
Thread:
Luo gone
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_27</b></div><div>That lineup is way too too heavy and still haven't addressed the issue of secondary scoring or defence which was the problem last season.. still not a playoff team</div></div>
That roster definitely makes the playoffs, I like Lou and Reims but goaltending is what cost them last year!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 12, 2019 at 3:09 p.m.
Thread:
Success
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>someone let me know if he made any good points in the bottom half of that paragraph. I saw that you were judging a defensive d man on his goals scored, and rolled my eyes.</div></div>
Name me a defensive dman in the last 5 years that any team has paid a premium for whether by trade or contract..... I'll wait.
Carlo is a nice piece sure but to think he has some sort of huge value is ludicrous!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 11, 2019 at 11:45 a.m.
Thread:
Success
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>I almost stopped reading at "Carlo is a fringe top four d man," but I didn't. It's just an absurd premise that doesn't really warrant discussion. A third liner leads the Bruins in goals in the playoffs. They've had 21 different goal scorers. At times Johansson has looked like their best forward. Krejci has been fantastic, Debrusk scored 27 goals this year in like 65 games.
It is very clear that you haven't seen enough of Boston to credible judge them.
Enjoy game 7.</div></div>
i have seen plenty of them, a 15 game stretch does not define a player, Carlo has scored 2 goals in the last two seasons over 150 games, over his first 3 years in the NHL (230gp, 8g, 24a), is he a good defensive player sure but cmon if you think he stacks of similarly to other second paring d man around the league your insane, he is absolutely on the bottom rung on the top 4 guys in the NHL. Just go down the list of teams the Bruins have played in the playoffs, outside of Toronto, Carlo isn't sniffing the top 4 of any of the other 3! He is a good young controllable dman but he is a long way from Bobby Orr (where you seem to think he is at). I know that 21 different players have scored goals stat is a trendy easy stat to site but how about the fact that the bruins scored 259 goals this past season 106 of those goals came from three players thats 41% of your total goal output from three guys!!! So yes you have a bunch of guys with a goal or two, if the Bruins plan is every year to hope that things break perfectly for them and all of the good teams get eliminated before they have to play them then sure keep doing what your doing. You are either a massive homer or high if you think this team was getting past the elite teams in the east!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 10, 2019 at 4:53 p.m.
Thread:
Success
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>I mentioned in a previous post that short of Marner, I don't think the leafs could get it done. However I didn't say I think that is fair, obviously the concept is absurd. To get Carlo from the Bruins, you have to make them an offer that make the Bruins better right away. They are clearly in a cup contending window, so if it doesn't make them better, why do they make the trade. Taking Carlo out of the lineup and putting Kapanen in makes them worse. Hell, Carlo out and Johnsson AND kapanen in makes them worse. I think that's really obvious, Carlo has been such a monster for the Bruins in this playoff run. There is obviously no fit here, which is kind of the point of me saying things like short of Marner, why would the Bruins do it.</div></div>
Carlo is a fringe top 4 NHL d man he is playing well but historically he is fringe top 4 d man, we can agree the Bruins are here because their path has been a proverbial cake walk, I am no leafs fan but I would say talent wise that has been their toughest opponent so far and that includes St. Louis, the top 10 teams in the league over the course of the regular season (5 of which are from the east) and they only had too play 1 of them. That being said anyone who watches hockey can see going forward Boston has a depth scoring issue, they rely on 3 guys for the overwhelming majority of their scoring. As an organization one area where they do have some young depth is on D so yes the idea of trading Carlo for a 2nd line scoring winger would be appealing to Boston, it gives them more offense up front for an area on D where they have plenty of young D men coming.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com