Edit Avatar
  • png, jpeg
  • Recommended minimum size 800px by 800px
  • Maximum size: 1MB
Drag image to reposition
Save
Cancel

keep_ups12

NoMansonMurphyDumba
Member Since
Jan 3, 2020
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
2nd Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Location
Mars
Forum Posts
3922
Posts per Day
10.13
Forum Threads
283
Biography
Leafs and flames fan. Love sports (not just hockey), like criticism. My twitter is KeepUps15. Also Andrew Mangiapane truther
Forum: Armchair-GMJan 14 at 2:46
Thread: Lines that wont make Keefe look high
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>faulkmydzingel</b></div><div>Yeah Holl was garbage last night. 22 mins played. An assist. Plus 1. 2 blocks. 0 giveaways. Time to get rid of this plug. As the 4th d man he should be doing way more...</div></div>

yea I can tell you didn't watch the game and you just looked at the statistics

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ritzy</b></div><div>Not sure what game you were watching, but Holl was covering for Muzz most of the night.</div></div>

no. There was so many turnovers he created and every time Montreal had the puck in the leafs zone while Holl was on the ice, they would get endless point shots. Letting another team kill you with shots is not "covering"

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Saskleaf</b></div><div>Didn't watch the game, but Holl seemed like Toronto's best defenceman that game lol.</div></div>

you probably should have. Andersen was playing good when Holl was on the ice for some reason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Hawks aren't doing this. As I've said many times to any proposed Murphy for Holl trade, Murphy is a good bit better then Holl and Hawks shouldn't trade them for a 2nd round pick as Holl doesn't have much value to the Hawks during a rebuild.</div></div>

Holl isn't suppose to be much value in this trade. Just suppose to be for cap so that this trade can work. theres also SDA who has middle 6 potential. We can mix the trade up and add more quality pieces if you like
Forum: Armchair-GMDec 2, 2020 at 9:46
Thread: Pens trade Edmonton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>it's the "good Potential" thing in relation to Puljujärvi that makes us all laugh</div></div>

You laugh at everything include yourself bot. You probably think Puljujarvi is some future 4th liner, so your opinion is invalid

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PGHBOB69</b></div><div>You guys have no clue who McCann is. Or ever watched him play. I understand, being a west coast team though. Not many Pens fans know about about West coast teams and players!!!

McCann is only 24, back to back 35 point season, good 2 way player, great shot, 20 goal scorer. Much more established than Puljujarvi. Played in the NHL since he was 19. Former 1st round pick. And not a 3C, yes’s he played there last year cause that’s where the pens were weak. But this year, he’s playing on the LW were he belongs. Great shot, can put the puck in the net. From the time he was 19-23 he’s been jumped around from 3C to top 6 wing, to bottom 6 wing. Now the pens GM and coach, said he’s staying on the LW all year. And gonna do what he does best. And score!! Players need that consistency and routine. Most athletes do.

If Puljujarvi has a bad year this year, his value goes way down. And Lavoie is just another “B”, “B+” prospect. He could bust the same way as Benson is.</div></div>

I know exactly who McCann is. Hes a defensive 3c that isn't that good at producing offense. He takes on low role but still exceeds there. Your valuing McCann a little to high but the problem is your way undervaluing Lavoie. Puljujarvi's value is pretty much a mystery but Lavoie is a very good prospect. Has second line potential
Forum: Armchair-GMNov 28, 2020 at 12:48
Thread: Leafs trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFan4Ever34</b></div><div>Coming from a Leafs fan, Tkachuk &gt; Marner.</div></div>

They are equal. Don't know how Tkachuk &gt; Marner

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jchafe77</b></div><div>Facts. Also, Calgary would be way over the cap. 2 million or more if im not wrong.
Marner+Rosen=11.2M
Tkachuk=7M

Do the math and tell me how much Calgary would be over cap by. The number aint pretty</div></div>

Yea and in 2 years Tkachuk is gonna want at least 10mil+. Yea that number ain't pretty either. Also Rosen can just be sent to the minors so I have no idea what logic that is

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KakkoForMauriceRichardAward</b></div><div>This debate is a testament to Tkachuk bringing more in terms of overall play than Marner. Tkachuk's grit and pain in the ass aspect of his game gives him more value than Marner</div></div>

what about defensive game and impact? Marner plays a much bigger role in Toronto and has a better defensive game and great passing to tie with Tkachuks grit
Forum: Armchair-GMNov 14, 2020 at 9:12