DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
kous
Member Since
Feb. 7, 2018
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
1487
Posts per Day
0.7
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 4:20 p.m.
Thread:
Buy the dip
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Green4D4</b></div><div>The Ducks, defensively, have been horrific for the past 3 seasons because the entire team has been horrific for the passed 3 seasons... -45 doesn't mean a whole lot when your best defenseman has been *checks notes* Cam Fowler.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Plus/minus is no more a definitive statistic than points, and by definition, a second-line player isn't an average player . . . or do you think that the second-line guys on YOUR favorite team are "average players"?</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Reinforcing your (and my) point: Discounting his ELC-busting first exposure, let's look at Cole Caufield's last 2-and-a-half seasons: 162 games, 115 points, -40.
I don't think he deserves any more, or less, scorn than Trevor Zegras, and neither one is an "average player."
Nick Suzuki's third and fourth seasons coincided with Trevor's (2021-2022 and 2022-2023); 164 games, 61 and 66 points, -42, long-term contract at $7,875,000. Just an "average player"?</div></div>
Don't worry Zegras doesn't know the name of the player on D either.
How is his game off the puck? he has no commitment to defense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 3:48 p.m.
Thread:
Buy the dip
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>First two full seasons:
Auston Matthews: 144 games, 69 and 63 points = 132 points
Mitch Marner: 159 games, 61 and 69 points = 130 points
Trevor Zegras: 156 games, 61 and 65 points = 126 points
William Nylander: 163 games, 61 and 61 points = 122 points
John Tavares*: 161 games, 54 and 67 points = 121 points (* with NY Islanders, of course)
Now, I'm not saying that Trevor Zegras is the equal of any of these players, or even all that close to them, but the frequent take that he's not that good a hockey player reveals a stunning ignorance. And there are some subtle indications that Toronto was a better team over the last 7 seasons (starting with 2016-2017) than Anaheim was over the past two.</div></div>
There is more to this game then just points. Lets talk about his -45 while putting up those numbers its not that he's not a good hockey player he's get more attention because of his "flash" than for his play overall he's an average player and will be a career 2nd liner at best
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 2:38 p.m.
Thread:
Buy the dip
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>That is a hall of shame worthy offer for Zegras, and is beaten by every other team in the league.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DRW2025</b></div><div>While this thread was supposed to be a joke, I'm not sure teams are begging the ducks for him.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>No, not all teams, agreed, but a sufficient number that <strong>IF</strong> Trevor Zegras is on the market, the Ducks will get Anaheim's desired price for him.</div></div>
This trade is not good but Zegras is all Flash. he's not that good of a hockey player,
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 2:20 p.m.
Thread:
BIG move
E A SPORTS if it's in the game it's in the game
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 30 at 1:34 p.m.
Thread:
24-25 Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JG1972</b></div><div>I think Gregor leaves. He haven’t been great. I’d rather give a Margie’s guy a shot next yr than keep him</div></div>
I liked the way he has played overall but he could be replaced by another Min $ 4th liner and we have a lot of kids in the lineup in the AGM so the Marlies will have their opportunity's
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Jan. 29 at 7:02 p.m.
Thread:
Monahan Colorado
Mohan is not worth Ritchie Avs decline
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 29 at 11:27 a.m.
Thread:
Bertuzzi
I would do this unfortunately the Leaf's won't be sellers (even if they should be)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 28 at 7:46 p.m.
Thread:
Dont think the Leafs will do anything big but if they do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DealFinder67</b></div><div>Yes because MM is a stud on D with 3 years left at a good AAV. Monaghan is a good rental and could probably resign him if he is willing to stay in the 3M range</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GuyGuyGuy</b></div><div>Monahan for a first and a fifth is fair, not sure if I would do Cowan for Matheson tho (and I’m a big Cowan fan)</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmurrayt</b></div><div>Brodie has negative value to Montreal, Monahan is worth a first, and Matheson is worth a lot more than that. If anything, Toronto seriously lacking in this trade proposal.</div></div>
I need what ever you guys are smoking
Monahan is worth a 3rd round pick. he is a 3rd line rental who a year ago Calgary had to pay a 1st to get rid of.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 3:43 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>JT is way better than Monahan, how does a worse player help him?</div></div>
Load management.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 3:41 p.m.
Thread:
What its looking like
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>He is the best RD available on the market, unless Dumba becomes available. He's the type of player every team wants for a playoff run. As for injury prone, auston Matthew's has missed more games then him in the last 4 seasons.</div></div>
That would increase the chance that Calgary gets more but as we get closer to the deadline more players will become available and if the price is too high people start to turn to other options
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 3:34 p.m.
Thread:
Guentzel NYR 24-25
So are you going to sign and trade Guentzel to the NYR? for how many years lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 3:28 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 Leafs
deleted
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 3:15 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Commonsense27</b></div><div>Sorry buddy, but you're out of touch with the NHL and trade process during the dealine if you think he doesn't go for a first minimum. Averaging a 60pt season on a team that doesn't score, can play wing or center, one of the best faceoff guys, defensively responsable and dirt cheap when half retained. Plus you add in the fact that there isn't a ton of rentals available this year. Bidding war gets a 1st plus</div></div>
You do realize that as we get closer to the deadline more teams will become sellers and more players will be available? He will be most likely picked up to play a 3rd line role not top 6.
3rd line recollimation projects don't return 1st round picks. I think your the one that's out of touch
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 3:09 p.m.
Thread:
Or this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SJSF</b></div><div>It isn't regardless of their value, if they have no value then it doesn't matter that they're included in a deal.
Let's say Brodie and Tanev are equal in value, why would the Flames trade to be in roughly the same spot as they were before the trade? They would just turn around and try to move Brodie (who from what I've seen doesn't seem to be drawing the same interest as Tanev even though it appears Toronto would be more than willing to part with him). Why not just move Tanev for younger pieces in the first place instead of getting back another older Dman? The Flames management (not just the fans) want FUTURES or young players like in the Sharangovich deal, and 2 thirds and a 33 year old player they would have to turn around and trade doesn't do it.
Of course this doesn't include the fact that Calgary is taking on a million in cap here for Brodie and Tanev (with 500k retained)
Regardless, I think we just have different valuations of Tanev so there isn't much more to touch on</div></div>
Brodie is not being shopped (other than on here) So that's why there is no interest.
I agree it make no sense for the Leaf's to move Brodie to add Tanev as it leaves both teams in the same situation, They would want to add Tanev and keep Brodie
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 3:01 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Commonsense27</b></div><div>You guys clearly haven't watched many habs games lol. Monahan is good on so many levels. There is a reason they're getting a first plus for him</div></div>
lol 1st plus because he's had half a good season?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 2:59 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Yeah, it would be nice to get a guy to shoulder some of JT's load, but Monahan isnt that guy. He just gets buried by anything approaching good competition and he's so slow and immobile out there he makes JT look like Mackinnon.
At best, Monahan is an add for a contender who has the ability to run a sheltered 3rd scoring line or has a pair of good 2 way wingers with speed to pair him with, he doesnt really fit in toronto</div></div>
Fair enough But they need a cheap option that allows them be slightly more competitive into the playoffs without mortgaging more of their future. this is not the year to go all in
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 2:56 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Come on man, we paid a fourth to get him, at least throw us a third for using a retention spot on him.</div></div>
but he's older and slower now :)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 2:55 p.m.
Thread:
What its looking like
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bast</b></div><div>I would be very surprised if Tanev only got a 2nd back, but we'll see in a month.</div></div>
Once the market opens up a bit and more teams decide they are out and become sellers the asking price will come down.
he's a 34 year old injury prone D so its a big ask for anything more than a 2nd
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 2:48 p.m.
Thread:
23-24 Leafs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JaredOfLondon</b></div><div>Monahan isnt going to be able to hack it in any top 6, he needs to be sheltered as hell just like Domi and get LOTS of power play time to produce. He's nothing the leafs need at all.
And similar for Lybushkin, the leafs really dont need slow bottom pairing guys, they have Benoit and Lagesson for that</div></div>
I was looking at him to help JT as he's starting to show his age, gives us a few different looks at 2c/3c
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 2:45 p.m.
Thread:
Or this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SJSF</b></div><div>I'll let the Flames fans weigh in but from what I've heard this isn't what they want for Tanev.
What value do those players have? Holmberg is a bottom 6 player thus far and Abruzzese is a career AHLer with 2 NHL games at 24 years old. Those aren't assets that intrigue a team looking for futures and picks. A third is what you're paying in retention so its Brodie and a 3rd for Tanev, with Brodie being a UFA and 33 years old?</div></div>
What the FANS want and what he's worth are 2 different things
Tanev is worth a 2nd round pick. Like I said Brodie is worth about the same they are not far off each other with Tanev being the slightly better player.
So for that slight difference the Leaf's are giving up 2 x 3rd round picks and 2 more players regardless of their value,
I would say that the 2 x 3rd round picks are more than enough on their own and so would brodie and 1 of Abruzzese or Holmberg
I would also expect 50% retention in those deals
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 2:29 p.m.
Thread:
Or this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SJSF</b></div><div>Cgy declines. If they commit to moving assets it won't be for a bunch of stuff, they need some mix of 1st/2nd round picks/prospects coming back in any of the trades they make.
This is especially true for any retention they give, that alone would cost something like a mid round pick</div></div>
Calgary would take this trade easy
Brodie =< Tanev not a huge difference
Then you get 2 more players and 2 picks?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 2:07 p.m.
Thread:
What its looking like
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bast</b></div><div>How can all 3 trades be bad for TOR at the same time?
If Tanev isn't worth a 1st, and Brodie is worth less, then you should be pretty happy with the 2nd. Or do you evaluate Brodie to be the better defender out of the two?</div></div>
Tanev = 2nd round pick so that deal is an over pay (in the right market the Flames might get a 1st)
Brodie makes no sense to trade him if you are adding Tanev as it minimizes what you are trying to do unless there is other D that is coming in
Lyubushkin can be had for the 3rd alone
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 27 at 1:55 p.m.
Thread:
What its looking like
No thank you all 3 trades are bad for the Leaf's
Tanev is not a 1st
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 26 at 5:08 p.m.
Thread:
Reaves Trade Plus Selling Other Dead Weight
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmgb</b></div><div>It's going to cost TOR to dump Reaves.
That's an overpay for Brodie, and why would NSH add him? To keep Barrie company in the press box?</div></div>
How is that an over pay? 2nd is what he is worth not saying NSH makes sense as a destination
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 26 at 4:00 p.m.
Thread:
win now
When have you ever seen 9 players from 1 team move the other way?
And for 2 x 3rd lines and 3rd paid D ??
First
2
3
4
Next
Page 3
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com