SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

mattmac1216

MartysBetter95
Member Since
May 3, 2017
Favourite Team
New Jersey Devils
Forum Posts
226
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 21, 2022 at 3:52 p.m.
Thread: Playoff Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mattmac1216</b></div><div>Personally I would welcome him back. I think the writing was on the wall when he left everyone knew he wanted to playoff his childhood team and the team his dad played for. Cant blame a man for that and he didn't have to take a paycut. Heard during his signing he was still considering staying til the last minute too. Honestly things worked out we have a deep pool of young players and he can still keep up with them. Don't see a reason not to sign him or give him a tryout unless he stays with Lou and Palms</div></div>

If Sevo looks for Max terms let him go no need for him for 7-8 years. but if he is willing as he has stated he wanted to be apart of seeing this through keep him he can still make the right passes to jumpstart the O and isn't a D liability.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 21, 2022 at 3:50 p.m.
Thread: Playoff Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>My biggest gripe was really with terms. Pierre Lebrun said last week that Severson was looking for max term (7-8 years). Imagine both Bratt and Pastrnak get that as well (if they want it). Sharangovich, let’s wait and see.

Also, how well would Parise be revived if we brought him back? Lotta mixed feelings there.</div></div>

Personally I would welcome him back. I think the writing was on the wall when he left everyone knew he wanted to playoff his childhood team and the team his dad played for. Cant blame a man for that and he didn't have to take a paycut. Heard during his signing he was still considering staying til the last minute too. Honestly things worked out we have a deep pool of young players and he can still keep up with them. Don't see a reason not to sign him or give him a tryout unless he stays with Lou and Palms
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 16, 2022 at 3:53 a.m.
Thread: Trade Deadline Fire Ruff
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheMooterus</b></div><div>Daws is 21. That's way too early to trade away a kid that was forced into the NHL last season due to injuries. Let him develop for another couple of years and see what you've got with him. You trade him away for a 4th and let another team develop him into a legit starter and you're going to be kicking yourself for the next decade.</div></div>

I totally agree! Hence me saying i like the guy. However 1 the staff has proven they cant develop a goalie so he will have a better chance elsewhere. 2 at this point the only way they get a decent return on any goalies is by selling teams on the idea of potential. Coaching staff would likely ruin him. Plus why i stated they are better off just spending the money on a proven starter. Schmid has as much potential so keep one or the other.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 14, 2022 at 12:30 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 5, 2022 at 2:18 p.m.
Thread: Deadline move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>The interesting thing about your pkg of assets to AZ gets you 3 yrs of JC. He's been dinged up a bunch and I just wonder if moving severson ourselves for a 1st + is not a better move? If it goes the way you think (I'll disagree about still building) that is better than giving up pcs. The other part is Nemec full t8.e next yr and Hughes most likely starting after Mich is done this yr changes the immediate need.
Does Bahl or Okhotiuk get and keep the bottom spot on the left? Dies either shine enough to replace Graves. All TBD</div></div>
I agree but i don't think graves is sticking around. They made the right choice in giving JS the money this offseason. JC isn't a need but an extra D insurance that if we can get for an expiring contact would be nice.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 3, 2022 at 11:03 p.m.
Thread: Deadline move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyIsMyPassion61</b></div><div>I'm talking about the OP's trade deal, it's just not what Arizona is asking for. They're not seeking 2 UFA's a late 1st that's 3 drafts away. Armstrong would :laugh his head off at this trade offer.</div></div>

Kindly must disagree, unless a team is willing to give up multiple top picks. which i don't think will be the case because you need a desperate team for a top D man. Obvi the Rotes won't do this unless they either know they can sign Sevo long term or are looking to take the 4.5 mil off the books by the end of the year. You have a good point they will probably want a 24 1st rounder instead. Id prefer NJ to hold onto that because i don't see the rebuilding ending as soon as others do. But won't be mad maybe even a 3rd or 2nd in 23 since its a deep draft. Not saying this is the best return AZ can get because there will be better offers and some team will get fleeced. But whoever it is will need to give up a prospect maybe NJ throws in a D prospect too, not exactly a AZ fan so idk what there needs are.
Updated Offer:
Sevo
1st 2024
2nd 23
Foote
MUK