Apr 3, 2017
Posts per Day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>toddbertuzzi44</b></div><div>if we didnt have the Neilsen contract, i would be more open to taking a risk on Turris</div></div>
For me, it’s this exactly. That plus the logjam then at centre. Nielsen and Turris would be fine, but then having Helm, LGD and Abby as well, we won’t be able to get rid of all of them. I’m already counting on Helm and Abby being scratched or injured. Can’t be scratching 3 forwards. The other option is no young guys in the lineup, I don’t like that idea either. We already signed Filps, no room for another vet forward unless we unload our guys (like you did in this trade). Just would prefer not getting two back, if it’s just Turris, maybe. Need Svech to get some chances. But having all of Nielsen, Turris and Filps is maybe just too much still.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Braah</b></div><div>Fair. People don’t watch Shattenkirk who say he’s a “cap dump”. Good deal for both sides.</div></div>
Just because he’s not a cap dump doesn’t mean Detroit wants him. Dmen on the roster: Hronek , Cholo, Bowey, Daley, Green, Nemeth, Ericsson, and Dekeyser (at the very least, all of these guys). And don’t point out that Shattenkirk is better than a couple of them. Just because we already have overpaid bottom pairing dmen doesn’t need we need more of them. No room for Shattenkirk, no desire for him, and definitely not taking him for this crap incentive