DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
pavelisgoat
Member Since
Apr. 3, 2017
Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
Forum Posts
1002
Posts per Day
0.4
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 7 at 1:04 a.m.
Thread:
Hanifin - again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>23 year olds still in the AHL showing little progression don't magically transform into "fairly good prospects." That delusional or lying. He's a C level at best prospect that is probably what? 10th best prospect for DET? Conroy gets that offer, wipes his ass with it, and sends it back to Yzerman.</div></div>
And to add, VGK pick conditions are worse for Calgary here than my trade. So I doubt Conroy woulda wiped his ass with this offer
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 7 at 1:03 a.m.
Thread:
Hanifin - again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>23 year olds still in the AHL showing little progression don't magically transform into "fairly good prospects." That delusional or lying. He's a C level at best prospect that is probably what? 10th best prospect for DET? Conroy gets that offer, wipes his ass with it, and sends it back to Yzerman.</div></div>
Anybody on/around the griffins compliments Ajo as their best Dman. That’s ahead of Edvinsson fyi. Ofc Ed has higher ceiling, but please. I think it’s at least fairly comparable to the guy Calgary got. I would say I nailed the value lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 2:57 p.m.
Thread:
Hanifin - again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>There's almost nothing of value in that package. A late first in 2025 or 2026 would probably be the equivalent of what you're offering here. 2024 is a week draft year, Holl is zero value at best, and the two other futures are minor collective positive value.</div></div>
Tampa can't trade a first until 2026. There's definitely tvm when it comes to draft picks. Regardless, AJo is a fairly good prospect that brings a replacement to the Flames at that position. Probably NHL ready. Best I see Tampa offering is 26 1st and Isaac Howard - throw in whatever later round picks. But I'm not so sure Howard is really on the table and regardless, think this wings trade is better value still.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 2:53 p.m.
Thread:
Hanifin - again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SharkTank</b></div><div>I don't believe Yzerman was ever in on Hanifin.</div></div>
I was in in him a month ago. With a similar proposal to this one. Who knows what Yzerman is thinking. Does anyone really know who he might be in on?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 2:51 p.m.
Thread:
Hanifin - again
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>That's a pretty horrible offer for an extension. Unless he is very restrictive on where he'll extend, can't see Conroy accepting that.</div></div>
I can't see Tampa able to offer much more and there hasn't been a lot of rumoured destinations for him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 6 at 1:35 p.m.
Thread:
Massive trade
Anything with Ed involved is a hard no for me. This type of player does not grow in trees, and has such a massive ceiling. You can call me crazy, but I would not have even been ok trading him in a deal for EP.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 2 at 9:05 a.m.
Thread:
Trade Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Absolutely not. Taking a package that is not what you want when plenty of other teams will offer better is the opposite of insanity. You have loads of excellent D prospects, and picked probably the last one the Blues would want, mostly because he is not the type of player they want. It's not always about what you think the "value" is, guys. There's other factors, namely fit. ASP does not fit. You have multiple other prospects who do fit very well.</div></div>
Look man, I completely agree on the value vs fit argument. However, if you get offered Asp and a first, there’s no way you don’t take it. If you don’t want Asp, you trade him for probably 2 1sts and boom - you have a way better return than anyone is going to give you.
Maybe the Blues are asking for someone else, but Edvinsson is a non starter. So if you want Johansson and a first, sure it’s more likely from both sides, but hypothetically you’re massively cheating yourself on value
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 29 at 4:41 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Willander, Edvinsson, Nikishin = fantastic targets, if not actually the best three. Are they? Maybe. Will their teams come off them? Probably not.
I have less than zero interest in ASP even before we go into the hyper inflated price he would cost. Hardest of passes.</div></div>
So even this trade package from Detroit would be a no from you? I understand if you aren’t an Asp fan and usually you have good takes. But turning down this package would be complete insanity
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 24 at 3:11 a.m.
Thread:
Playing the kids
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>They're not that young. The nature of the sport and league itself is randomness and parity. Making the data even more reliable compared to eye tests. And as I already stated, there is close to a 0% chance anyone on this site is watching enough hockey to hold a useful eye test opinion in the first place. I'm just willing to admit that fact whereas fans that probably only watch their own team have zero frame of reference without analytics.</div></div>
I watch 2 games most nights. I trust my eye test more than I trust analytics. I don’t expect you to trust my eye test more than analytics though if you believe in them. I just think they’re deeply flawed. Certain metrics can tell you part of the story, but I personally only like to use them to confirm or challenge something I thought I saw. As a stand-alone, I think they have a long way to come. So many variables to take into account. As you say with randomness, how can you incorporate xyz into a model to account for everything, limit randomness from the metrics and so on - long way from that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 11:44 p.m.
Thread:
Playing the kids
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>The collective value of the open source materials is greater than any single opinion. I also never said I "didn't watch the game." That's a false equivalency on your part to discredit me. Merely that it is impossible to watch enough video to have a sound opinion over the data available. And nothing from the data resembles positively for Chiarot either before his signing nor now. I don't have any personal vendetta against Yzerman. I do think Detroit is an utter cesspool of a city though as proven by any data.</div></div>
Hockey analytics are at such a young stage of their development that they are deeply flawed. Maybe 25 years from now you will be correct that the value of the data will outweigh even most of the best scouts of the game. But in its current state, analytical data can only scratch the surface of telling you the story, and can often be flawed for such a number of reasons. Yes, it will likely tell us that McDavid is creating a number of chances for while on the ice. But it might fail to grade harshly enough on the egregious turnover that leads to the other teams GWG. And that is only using one of the most obvious examples of analytics lining up with the eye test, mostly. Most players are not that simple to analyze.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 12:27 p.m.
Thread:
Playing the kids
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mmccRed198913</b></div><div>I screamed Bench Ben like 8x last night then he goes and makes that play. He’s a constant aggravation</div></div>
Benny was unbelievable last night and I had said that long before OT. Idk what it takes with this fan base to look past the name on the sweater.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 12:21 p.m.
Thread:
Rumored Wings Dream Scenario
Would froth at the mouth for Kaprizov. But I wouldn’t do it. Moves up our window with a team that I don’t think is ready.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 1:30 a.m.
Thread:
Hanifin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>The thing is, rookie’s rarely have a huge impact. Look at the Calder race this year, maybe 4 or 5 guys total on the league are being meaningful top end contributors for their team. Everyone else is plying at replacement level.
So adding 3 rookies to play top 4 D, 3C, and 1LW is a big gamble. There will be a lot of growing pains and your limiting your ability to shelter their minutes.</div></div>
Simon is a good bet for it no matter what. So I'd leave him out of it, especially considering it would be fairly easy to shelter his minutes with this D. Basically Hanifin an upgrade on Ghost and Simon replacing Maata - should be an improvement in both cases. But I agree with you up front. I just think they're both cerebral players that I hope can handle it. Both good skaters and coming into a good environment. Not necessarily asking too much of them given their linemates. In order to improve on this year, they would need to be good, but it might be more about getting them in there so we can improve the following years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 22 at 7:20 p.m.
Thread:
Hanifin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>its always a risky move to build out a roster that will rely on 4 rookies with a combined 12 nhl games playing important roles</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jfstompers</b></div><div>They won't play the rookie who's ready right now nevermind 5 of them</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>We're Detroit not Buffalo, Buffalo adding a lot of rooies hasn't worked out well for them this year.</div></div>
Mazur is pencilled in as sharing that spot as in, he is competing for it. So let’s call it 3. Is that all that crazy? Our roster will be better suited to absorb it with lower changeover, and a more complete and competitive established team. That’s why they weren’t willing to do it previously. 3 top 10 picks with only 1 not having pro experience
Edit: forgot I have Cossa in here. Let’s just pretend he’s not really there.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 22 at 3:59 a.m.
Thread:
Sell
I would not trade away Veleno or Fischer for those prices. The others are heavily favouring Detroit and I would do them lol.
Forum:
NHL Signings
Feb. 20 at 12:33 p.m.
Thread:
Detroit Red Wings signed Michael Rasmussen (4 Years / $3,200,000 AAV)
Great deal for the wings. Eats a lot of space on the ice and if he can just learn to shoot the puck would score a ton due to a great forechecking ability
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16 at 4:25 a.m.
Thread:
bro time and Granlund Campbell swap and Reim time
I almost want to say Detroit needs Campbell in the deal if you want Reimer. Big lol to both goalies. But we need another goalie with Husso injuries and would take the compensation that comes with him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 13 at 2:29 a.m.
Thread:
Deadline
I’d hate to trade for Hanifin and not get him re-signed. But if we add him to our LD that already include Walman, Maata and Chiarot, when does Edvinsson get his chance to play?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 12 at 10:57 p.m.
Thread:
Pens
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_Gardoki</b></div><div>Only in very specific situations. Most deadline deals are viewed as rentals and that's not debatable. He woudln't get less than Lindholm or Monahan. He'd get more.</div></div>
I disagree that he would for sure get more than Lindholm. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t see Jake being traded. Many reasons I say this:
Crosby effect is legit. I would point to how good Lindholm was with Tkachuk and Gaudreau. That’s the player I would compare to Jake with Crosby. Compare apples to apples as if they both have the luxury of really good teammates.
Lindholm is a center and that comes at a premium.
Acquiring Lindholm would be more likely to have a shot at resigning him, in theory.
I don’t see Jake fetching a first and Barlow for example, without him being resigned. And as I’ve said, I don’t see him being trade at all.
This offer is far superior than what the jets gave up for Monahan. That 2nd is maybe only 6 picks or so worse than the jets first. Chibrikov is a decent prospect and type of guy Pitt needs to add to their system. Barron and Kupari are both good bottom 6 players that would help Pitt compete while Crosby is around. If I’m the jets, it would take more than a 2nd rounder to pry Barron away from me, for an idea of value
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 11 at 2:16 p.m.
Thread:
Who to resign
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>And the 28 games last year? The 56 the year before that? The 30 before that?
If we want someone, why don't we just go sign them?</div></div>
Be my guest. As it says in the trade: Anaheim is a placeholder team here but it’s not totally unrealistic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 11 at 4:58 a.m.
Thread:
Who to resign
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>What exactly is Fabbri an improvement on? Guy has to be available in order to take a spot in the lineup.</div></div>
Only 3 Ducks have more than his 13 goals. And no guarantee all of those guys are back in Anaheim next season. Fabbri has played 39/51 games. Missed a stretch earlier in the season but has otherwise been a clean bill of health
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 10 at 3:51 a.m.
Thread:
CRAZY offszn
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Rocket</b></div><div>He played the most minutes on Detroit for several seasons before the trade. He has been a top pairing defenseman for several years.
He’s better than demelo and younger. This is a big upgrade for winnepeg</div></div>
As a red wings fan, I believe it’s pretty hard to judge. Hronek at times looked great in Detroit, but also often got exposed defensively. Due to our situation, he was used a lot. In Vancouver, he not only has the benefit on playing with Hughes, but they have a fairly favourable deployment. If he played with Morrissey in Winnipeg, that would be beneficial as well, but would likely require harder minutes. Tough to judge then where he would fall in line between Vancouver and Detroit in performance, as it would be somewhere in the middle. Probably more palatable for the jets would be this deal and a cheaper contract
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 3:24 a.m.
Thread:
Whats the cost
So what I’m saying is Wpg keeps Schmidt, Ana retains 50% on Henrique and Jets send their first and maybe a little sweetener the ducks way is what is fair for me
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 3:23 a.m.
Thread:
Whats the cost
Few days ago I mocked Henrique to the Jets for a first and was chastised for it being a gross overpay lol. How quickly people’s perceptions change. I think no way Henrique fetches Lindholm return though
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 3:19 a.m.
Thread:
Next Season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SharkTank</b></div><div>I can see not bringing Sprong back.
He may get overpaid in UFA.
But I'd sure like to see Kane return.
I've really enjoyed watching him play in Detroit with Cat.
It's helped me survive my depression watching the Sharks! 😁</div></div>
While it’s likely just by chance and the crazy stretch the Wings had in December. The team’s record with Kane (6-9-4) vs without Kane (20-9-1) does bring me some pause, despite knowing Kane has looked fantastic and instantly brings a winning pedigree to this team.
Because of that, I’m torn if it is or isn’t the right move to try and bring him back.
Sprong I can also see possibly going either way. But he has been very good for us.
First
2
3
Next
Page 2
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com