ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

PLAYERS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

pavelski_tip_in

Member Since

Mar. 30, 2022

Favourite Team

San Jose Sharks

Forum Posts

144

Posts per Day

0.3

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 2:54 p.m.

Thread: Backlund and Duclair

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pavelski_tip_in</b></div><div>I think you're right about using the retention spot strategically to facilitate trades. But, I would rather watch Labanc and Hoffman walk as UFAs because their current AAVs make them untradable if it means we can get as close to a 1st rounder for either Duclair or Barabanov with retention. I think one high draft pick in the 20s-30s is worth more than a few mid-range picks that we could get by retaining on Labanc or Hoffman and trading Duclair/Barabanov at their actual cap hit.</div></div>

yeah I agree, if retention is the difference between a 2nd and a 1st then yeah, better to do that than just get a 4th or something for Labanc/Hoffman w/ retention. I would just doubt that 1.5 in retention would make up a big difference like that.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 13 at 1:59 p.m.

Thread: Backlund and Duclair

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>goodfella</b></div><div>That'll be a low 30s pick. I think this might be fair.</div></div>

fair, but have to use last retention spot wisely. Might make more sense on a guy like Labanc or Hoffman because they have more aav, so more retention is possible.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 13 at 10:42 a.m.

Thread: Backlund and Duclair

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SJSGM</b></div><div>value-wise it's fair, but I think SJ would need an overpay to use their last retention slot at this point</div></div>

That'll be a low 30s pick. I think this might be fair.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 12 at 7:58 p.m.

Thread: Solidifying

I would think the Sharks would prefer to keep Ruuta.

Doubt the Jackets would move Peeke for that.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 8 at 11:06 p.m.

Thread: Depth and question

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>V123</b></div><div>Really?? I think a 4th is fair value for him</div></div>

Why give up a young player for a 4th if he's a player you'd be thrilled to have gotten in the 4th round? Most 4th rounders never even make it to the NHL. Good contract for 2 more years + still under team control after that. He played well for NJD before getting traded to San Jose, so the Sharks are going to want to see what he can do starting fresh with us this season.

Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 2 at 4:28 a.m.

Thread: We have to start contending

San Jose is not giving up a 2nd for Gallagher. Montreal would have to give us picks to take him. The Sharks are trying to get out of long overpay contracts, not take more on.

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 16 at 7:32 a.m.

Thread: 202324

I guess the sharks could help out of the goodness of their hearts

Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 4 at 11:32 a.m.

Thread: Thanks Jake

I just can’t imagine the sharks eating 4 million and getting nothing good in return.

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 3 at 5:45 p.m.

Thread: Karlson

So you think the San Jose Sharks can eat over 36 million for a couple of late round picks? Does Mike Grier owe Pittsburgh something?

These trade offers are beyond horrible from Pens fans. It’s like none of you have any concept of money and reality. Yeesh.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 25 at 8:00 p.m.

Thread: Karlsson return will be disappointing for Sharks fans

Would you do Sharangovich and a 3rd for Barabonov

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 28 at 10:26 p.m.

Thread: Leafs 23-24 Off-Season Augmentation I

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pavelski_tip_in</b></div><div>Quantity can't replace quality when trading for top players.

You need to include 1st round picks and top prospects to get a deal like this done, especially because you're asking for 7 years of retention.</div></div>
7 years of retention and not only that Hertl as well just as a player for that return is awful for sharks. I’m not even sure the cost of Hertl but i’m assuming probably 1st+2nd+young player+prospect, and forget the retention it won’t happen.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18 at 12:46 a.m.

Thread: Marner is traded

San Jose isn’t paying the 36th overall to take on a cap dump and a struggling prospect

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8 at 9:25 a.m.

Thread: FINAL 2024 Toronto Maple Leafs

So you're going to give up the Boston first in order to relieve yourselves of Matt Murray's contract?

You have $1,456,050 in cap space shown above.

Matt Murray's buyout costs you $687,500 against the cap.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5 at 1:47 p.m.

Thread: Next Year

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gronk9911</b></div><div>No, the rumour was Yamamoto, Barrie, Broberg, Holloway and a 1st, . With 40% retained.

Like I said, GM botched the trade.</div></div>

Where did that rumor come from? According to Stauffer the offer was 1st, Bouchard, Bourgault, two contracts (Barrie + someone else).

40-50% retention can easily be considered a dodge and not a botch based on the return. There wasn't enough being offered to retain that much... to pay another team to have your star player.

Also there wasn't enough time to work out something with a third team. The Meier trade seemed to eat up all their time.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 29 at 8:50 a.m.

Thread: Karlsson stays Barabanov and Labanc flipped Clifton Engvall Raanta signed

Not getting the 40th overall from Washington. Change it to a 2025 2nd and it’s fine

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 29, 2022 at 9:36 p.m.

Thread: Mixing development with being good enough

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PrisonMike</b></div><div>I'd like to get feedback from the San Jose fan base, are they retooling or looking to rebuild according to management?</div></div>

Not a San Jose fan but can’t see a rebuild . More of a build a better and stronger prospect pool while trying to move the older players and go younger .

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2023 CapFriendly.com