- png, jpeg
- Recommended minimum size 800px by 800px
- Maximum size: 1MB
Feb 9, 2017
Posts per Day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>markmws</b></div><div>I read an interesting article on <em>The Hockey News</em> website about a possible Eichel trade: essentially, the market is going to dictate what the Sabres would receive. While many Sabres fans would love to receive a Byfield, a Zegres, a Lafreniere, the likelyhood of the Ducks, Kings and Rangers being willing to deal any of those three is extremely slim. The Sabres are, unfortunately, in an extremely difficult position. I do not have a horse in this race, but I honestly think that, if Eichel <em>does</em> request a trade (honestly, he hasn't yet and there is no telling if he is even interested in being traded), he may not fetch as much as everyone seems to think he will.
I am by no means saying that he is not worth it: Eichel is an extremely talented player that every team would love to have. But everyone also has not taken into account a salary cap system that has been severely affected by Covid-19: with a flat cap, a deal for Eichel will likely have to involve the Sabres taking on money. A deal for a bunch of high level prospects or other $10 million dollar players is, realiistically, unlikely: there is just no way teams that have $10 million dollar players either a.) want to trade them, or b.) are being pressured by those very players to leave said team.
To suggest that this is a bad deal for the Sabres, or that they could get more, is essentially being ignorant to the many other variables at play when determininga a trade. The Kings, who are actually a <em>suprisingly pretty</em> good team this year. They do not <em>have</em> to make the trade, just as the Sabres do not <em>have</em> to trade Eichel.
It's not a fun position for the Sabres or their fans to be in, and I empathize with that. It hasn't been fun there in a while and I know that's awful. Better days are ahead: just by the laws of probability, they have to be. I am rooting for them.</div></div>
I agree that the market will decide the price IF he is traded. And for me, IF he is traded depends entirely on the return. Im not unreasonable, i have seen trade proposals that omit byfield and lafreniere that i think are acceptable. Teams like anaheim, calgary, minnesota, and montreal seem to have a much bigger dropoff if they omit zegras, tkachuk, kaprizov, and suzuki/caulfield. Whats important for the sabres, is their gm not settle for spare parts. From LA, turcotte plus a 22 first is a very good start.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>flamesfan</b></div><div>Tkachuk is, mcdavid is, mackinnon is, Matthews is, makar is, barkov is, and probably others I’m forgetting</div></div>
Partially agree, barkov is a no. Its subjective who is better, its certainly not any kind of sure thing, and barkov has 4 fewer years on his contract. Of course barkov makes half as much, so florida wouldnt trade him anyways, but those extra years for eichel count here. You would be trading 5 years of eichel for 1 year of barkov, for instance. There is no way the sabres make that trade, unless barkov agrees, nvm, you get the jist.