DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah Hockey Club
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah Hockey Club
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
sharksdoee
sharks88
Member Since
Jul. 3, 2019
Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
Forum Posts
403
Posts per Day
0.2
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 15 at 9:45 p.m.
Thread:
Sell everything
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>SJ doesn't do WPG or PHI trades. The others they would.</div></div>
I dont think we would do the Edmonton deal, prolly wouldnt touch Campbell with a 10 ft pole
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 10:30 p.m.
Thread:
Hot take
It's a good thing that you included that fourth to make the exchange even.
I wonder if this is yet another attempt to prove the validity of Poe's Theorem.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 9 at 7:48 p.m.
Thread:
my dream avs deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>Might take an extra mid/late round pick for the Sharks to take him but I generally would be fine taking him on.</div></div>
4th and a 5th?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 6 at 3:01 p.m.
Thread:
Ranger fans ANA does not want goodrow
Cost to dump Goody is a 1st plus. 3 more years AFTER this at nearly 4 mil is a terrible contract that no one is taking on unless it's a haul. So add a a 1st to that and the Sharks maybe consider
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 3:42 p.m.
Thread:
Cheaper Ideas Asset-Wise
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>Hate to lose Mario but Rosen could address a thin RW prospect pool. Not sure how highly regarded he is but if he projects to be a middle 6 guy I like it.</div></div>
Im in the same boat but i think it would take more to pry Mario away from Grier unless we could land a good UFA who can minute munch so our d prospects still develop well.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 5 at 2:05 p.m.
Thread:
Going for 3
Sharks 100% do that. Hell, you can take out the one of the picks and they'd still do that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 7:39 p.m.
Thread:
Adapted from the Proposal of JoeThorntonsBeard
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>Replace duclair with Zetterlund
No need for Kuraly</div></div>
Sorry what? Kakko's value is at an all time low and Zetterlund is at an all time high. You could add a 2nd with Kakko and and wouldn't trade Zetterlund for him
The original offer isn't even close. Kakko isn't worth two middle/top six forwards, one being a rental and the other you have at 2.5 mil for another year. Not to mention adding a pure cap dump with it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 3:33 p.m.
Thread:
Low Key
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>Holtz + is laughable.</div></div>
The devils wouldn’t even offer Holtz+ for Meier lmao
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 1 at 3:07 p.m.
Thread:
What Drury should do at the TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>I'd probably do that.
I'd try and counter with Duke 50% retained instead of MG and drop Jones, Berard, and the 4th from the trade since you'll still have space for an extra. Obv throws a wrinkle for next year since MG has the extra year at 5m.
Either way, as is it's an interesting trade that the Sharks should consider.</div></div>
It's the 5m next year that I thought would be a bigger issue for NY than SJ since SJ is still rebuilding. Especially if Chytil's latest injury isn't career ending, we'd also have that 4.5m on the books. Granlund at 3m would mainly be an insurance policy that could always shift to RW.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 31 at 12:09 p.m.
Thread:
Swinging Kahks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>I like the framework of KK + BG.
The Rags need a 3C, and Sturm won't really fit that mold for them.
I'd rather see SJ keep Sturm here and do 50% on Duke for a little better return that still gives NY cap flexibility for a 3C for the playoff run.
Either way, I'd be good with something like you've made.</div></div>
Thanks for the feedback!
I thought about some of the same things (Rags needing 3C). I went with this in the end because (1) they will also need to replace BG with someone (enter Sturm), and (2) this leaves them with all their picks and some cap space to try and address that other need. In other words, while it doesn't solve every problem, it does leave them in a position to make another move.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 2:14 p.m.
Thread:
TDL Impact on 24-25
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Prime_Jimbo</b></div><div>And I'm sure those teams regret those trades</div></div>
Yeah I'm sure Tampa really regrets winning their two cups, with the difference makers being the Coleman, Gourde, Goodrow line being the most dominant 3rd line in recent memory
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 24 at 2:58 a.m.
Thread:
try something when Chytil comes back
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>Would you be concerned that the bottom 6, while not bad defensively, would be pretty bad in terms of offensive production and just rely on a very strong top 6 to carry that weight? Wondering if NY tries to add a middle 6 winger so you can drop Chytil/VT to the 3C and have some offense there as well.</div></div>
I wouldnt see this as permanent changes, eveentually yes i think youd hsve to run a 3rd line of something like
Cuylle - Troch - Wheeler
But Mika has just been so bad lately and if the all star break doeent fix that he needs a boost to get him out of whatever rut hes in
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 20 at 1:48 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Frameworks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>Right now with no retention - not much, maybe a 3rd? But he's been good with SJ and makes the team more fun to watch so I'd say they keep him at that return.
1/2 retained this TDL - I could see a 2nd + for what he's done. It's certainly risky but could pay off as a short term addition.
1/2 retained in offseason or next TDL - probably just a low 2nd if he keeps up what he's doing.</div></div>
I'd do a 3rd right now if I was Chevy, would add a 2025 2nd for some retention and add another change of scenery prospect/player like Chisholm to sweeten the deal for the Sharks.
Some retention would be great but I doubt the Sharks would use their last retention spot on Granlund, they probably want to use that on a UFA so they can have another retention spot for next years TDL.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 20 at 2:56 a.m.
Thread:
Trade Frameworks
that would be very generous of former oiler mike grier to offer a deal like that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 19 at 11:36 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Frameworks
I’d say yes as ACGM. Rangers SHOULD do that, would they? Idk
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 20 at 1:22 a.m.
Thread:
Trade Frameworks
Not the worst I've seen for the Avs but it's still pretty 'meh'. Benning I was big on but his injury woes trouble me. Granlund is just a band aid at C. Olausson I'm not ready to give up on yet unless it's a 'has to be done' deal. I also think Kahkonen might be the Shark the Avs would likely have the most interest in as it currently stands.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 19 at 7:28 p.m.
Thread:
3 Team Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>charlie coyle is outperforming tomas hertl now that he's been given top six duties. I don't see the point in taking on a massive contract that takes a player to age 37, and paying to do so.</div></div>
I love coyle and he has done great but come on, look at coyles average linemates and team in general compared to Hertl’s.
Hertl is carrying the whole team essentially, give him Pasta and Zacha don Hertl easily becomes a PPG center again
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 12 at 2:33 p.m.
Thread:
asap
I don't know about ASAP, but this is definitely Rocky...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 11 at 12:53 p.m.
Thread:
Canes trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DFinn91</b></div><div>Well a player that’s 4 years out fits the Sharks timeline better anyways.
Thrun has been fine, but he was traded for a 3rd rounder less than a year ago. What has he done to increase his value in that time? Not even be good enough to always be in the lineup for one of the worst teams of all time.
So what if the 1st rounder is late. The Sharks grabbed Musty with a late 1st last year. Good players fall in the draft all the time. You could also use this pick with the Pit 1st to move up in the 1st to grab another high end prospect.</div></div>
No they don't. Sharks should be competing in 4 years, not debuting new players hoping they can be Calder level players, unless your goal is to perpetually rebuild.
2023 was the deepest draft since 2015. Musty caliber players won't be available this year. And the sharks struck gold with him and even then you have no idea how he'll pan out when he jumps from Juniors to pro, and then from AHL to NHL. Coe was a steal, Bordeleau was a steal, Blichfield, Chmelevski, Chekhovich were all steals at one point. All these guys had monster junior years and never panned out in the NHL (Bordeleau still has potential).
As for Thruns value. He's playing better and better literally everygame. He has great potential as a two-way d-man and has debatably been their second best d-man behind Ferraro since getting called back up. On top of that, we got him for a 3rd because he was going to be a UFA in 3 months because he didn't fit in Anaheim's system. That's actually a decent price to pay given the risk, but it worked out because the Sharks played him in the NHL at the end of the season to burn a year off his contract
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Jan. 5 at 3:39 p.m.
Thread:
Talking Hanifin Per Pagnotta
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dr_Invictus</b></div><div>Other than the 1st, I don't see much of value in the CGY deal, especially with retention.</div></div>
Former 2nd round pick in Dahl who likely is a top 4D for you. Reality is I think that this might be too much going to Calgary as a rental. A first and a third should be sufficient
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 25, 2023 at 3:02 p.m.
Thread:
How much would this cost
$4m retained for 4 more years would be eye-wateringly expensive, almost certainly a price that no team in the NHL would be willing to pay for a player in their 30s. The price for that plus Blackwood (worth around a second) and Benning (worth maybe a third) would start with 2 1sts, and you would still need to add on to that. Couture doesn't bring enough value to justify paying that price, but the Sharks wouldn't retain that kind of money for less.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 20, 2023 at 1:28 p.m.
Thread:
New Jersey Devils
The only time Holtz is on the table for gibson would be 1 for 1, 50% retained and even that's a maybe
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 19, 2023 at 3:40 p.m.
Thread:
Red Wings
If you added a conditional 2nd (upgrades to a 1st if DET makes the second round) Sharks would do that.
Granlund is playing like a 1C right now and is a fantastic PKer, he's worth around a 1st (1st + if Sharks retained), Berggren is solid but not really what Sharks are looking for. They have a lot of small wingers in their system. He'd get pushed out by Gushchin, Robins and Cardwell within a couple years. And Copp is a terrible contract. I'd be willing to take it on if I were Grier, but certainly not or this price
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 19, 2023 at 2:45 p.m.
Thread:
Next move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BruinsWoahWoah</b></div><div>Sharks could have gotten a haul for a 28-year old top 6 Center on an expiring $5.6M AAV contract... what do you think his price is now?</div></div>
Sharks probably just keep him since they need some vets around to mentor the youngsters. It’d probably take a first + a good prospect + whatever roster players to make the money work.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 19, 2023 at 2:13 p.m.
Thread:
Next move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharksdoee</b></div><div>Would love a Hertl - Pasta Czech combo. SJ desperately needs RW prospects too, wish a trade like that could be worked out.</div></div>
Zacha - Hertl - Pasta would be such a great line, but I don't think its going to happen.
I was surprised that the Sharks re-signed Hertl... it didn't make sense at the time with the direction of the team. It was in the interest of both parties to start fresh: Hertl goes to a competitive team for assets and Sharks to start the rebuild. He signed that contract and IMO Sharks are probably three years away from being a competitive team - right at the time Hertl is leaving his prime.
His contract isn't terrible, but I am not sure any team is going to give the Sharks an offer that blows them away on Hertl. I hope he doesn't end up like Couture/Vlasic where he is just sitting on the books waiting for his contract to expire in his mid to late 30s.
First
3
4
5
Next
Page 4
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com