slamdunk

Member Since

Jun. 18, 2015

Favourite Team

Ottawa Senators

2nd Favourite Team

Los Angeles Kings

Forum Posts

312

Posts per Day

0.1

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 28, 2019 at 3:37 p.m.

Thread: Draft floor trades

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Green4D4Again</b></div><div>Cap floor. He's an RFA so we need to pay minimum 5 to qualify him and, for some reason, Dorion has a hard-on for him so... we're stuck with him.</div></div>

Yeah but if he signs him for one year he can just walk at UFA, imo you either sign him this summer long term (which I don't want, also if that were the case he can't demand 5 mill) or you move on. Its better than running into the stone situation except with a worse player, I'd much rather trade him this summer than get an even crappier return next year at the deadline.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 28, 2019 at 3:10 p.m.

Thread: Draft floor trades

Why did we re-sign Ceci for 5 mill?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2019 at 11:31 a.m.

Thread: btgum

You value Coyle way too much especially considering the fact that Colorado's pick can land them in a lottery spot (not including ottawas pick)

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2019 at 11:29 a.m.

Thread: Re-tool

How does Boston getting a top 6 forward with an injured Pastrnak not make sense?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15, 2019 at 11:28 a.m.

Thread: Stone Dzingel and Duchene Out

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>I'm a realist. I don't think they are going anywhere in the playoffs. It is what it is. Panarin or no Panarin.
CBJ is two years away from playing in the ECF.</div></div>

Management thinks they can go far, its not a matter of my opinion or your opinion

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14, 2019 at 1:46 p.m.

Thread: Deadline

As a Sens fan I have to admit I think the returns are too handsome especially for Stone and Duchene, any return like that would warrant an extension. There's too many forwards available this year's deadline thus reducing the value of the ones we have available. Look what we got for EK and that was for a full year of his services with no other RHD being available rumoured for trade at that time besides Justin Faulk, the edmonton one is only acceptable because how bad Pool Party and Lucic have been but even then I don't see them moving a first unless an extensions included.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14, 2019 at 1:40 p.m.

Thread: Stone Dzingel and Duchene Out

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>yeah, OR you get assets for Panarin and then talk to them in FA since they are both certain to hit FA if they aren't signing with Ottawa.
Teams look much more attractive when they have more pieces on them than fewer.</div></div>

I think the point here is that CBJ makes a run this yr...they said that if the return for Panarin isn't great then they'd use his as a rental. I'd agree with your logic but its clear they want to make a run this year

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14, 2019 at 11:38 a.m.

Thread: Huberdeau - feedback

Pulijarvvi and the rest of the package isn't close enough to get you Huberdeau, I don't see why fla would trade Huberdeau unless it's to free up cap space for Panarin and Bob. But nonetheless they'd be looking for a bigger return.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14, 2019 at 11:33 a.m.

Thread: Stone Dzingel and Duchene Out

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TheBoulster</b></div><div>So what I'm understanding is that Duchene + Dzingel + Stone is only fetching us 2 1sts, some cap dumps and conditional late picks?</div></div>

What exactly did the 'best' dman in the world fetch for a full year of his services? Consider the market, this year has the most available top 6 players of any trade deadline, if it was any year than I'd be in agreement with you

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14, 2019 at 11:31 a.m.

Thread: Stone Dzingel and Duchene Out

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>CBJ trade is pointless for both teams.</div></div>

CBJ has interest in Duchene, atleast you can get him and Dzingel and convince one to re-sign rather than lose Panarin for nothing because he's walking regardless

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14, 2019 at 11:31 a.m.

Thread: Stone Dzingel and Duchene Out

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BurgerBoss</b></div><div>That's very bad return for Stone. Perreault's a 3rd liner, Petan's a 4th liner, Kulikov's a cap dump and low 1st and 2nd have pretty much no value. They lose a TOP10 right winger and don't get any quality assets in the exchange - and they don't even save money, which would leave Melnyk quite furious I'd think.</div></div>

Look what a full season of Karlsson fetched, I don't know what you're expecting in return and Petan is still young

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 13, 2019 at 3:02 p.m.

Thread: Rebuild

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HabsForEver</b></div><div>Haha, Please delete that Montreal trade. I shouldn't have to tell you why.</div></div>

Because you have been looking for a big center for the past 5 years? I bet if you saw Subban for Weber before the trade happened you would've said the same thing.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 1, 2019 at 3:52 p.m.

Thread: Re-Shuffle after Trade

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LukeCBJ</b></div><div>trade with cbj is atrocious. you way undervalued murray</div></div>

What a homer comment give your head shake you get Huberdeau back and a signed Brassard, you can essentially lose Panarin for nothing.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 30, 2019 at 6:14 p.m.

Thread: Trade Deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Badgm91</b></div><div>That’s a big nope from NYI, $4.3M for an average defenseman at best? Maybe if you are retaining 50% of his salary the trade may work, but a forward with good upside and a 2nd round pick for an overpaid average defenseman, not a chance</div></div>

Maybe take a look at the comment I made, the trade is based on how much value an NHL Insider put on Ceci. Imo he's worth less as well

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 29, 2019 at 1:04 p.m.

Thread: Cup Run

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mikearky</b></div><div>Wings want young, promising and cost controlled and none of which describes Maata. No Thanks.</div></div>

Didn't know a 24 yr old dman with 2 stanley cups is a dinosaur...sure would rather have his cap hit, play and term over Dekyser.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 29, 2019 at 1:02 a.m.

Thread: Trade with Montreal

I think your undervaluing Danault, MTL likes him a lot and I don't think it will take a disgruntled 30+ yr old winger to get him. Mangiapane is a good pro but has yet to show much consistency in the NHL to warrant such a return.

Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 24, 2019 at 11:09 a.m.

Thread: New look

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DONTGIVEAPUCK13</b></div><div>No way Avs give up on Grub a year into trade for Sekera who hasn't played for two years.

I don't know why Ottawa would ake that trade</div></div>

Ottawa has too many d-men, our younger d is pushing into the lineup for 5/6 spots, so what's the sense in having Boro take those minutes? May as well take a chance on Spooner

Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 23, 2018 at 10:47 a.m.

Thread: COMMENT OFFERS FOR TROUBA

Leafs: Gardiner, 1st round pick (additional 2nd if Gardiner turns UFA), Connor Brown, Leivo or Carrick.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2018 at 3:22 p.m.

Thread: Panarin and Tavares + Seguins new contract. Thoughts CBJ fans? (Read Description

I think CLB would want maybe a one for one, someone that can step in Panarin's. Them trading him makes them worse in the now if it's for what you are offering, I think they still want to compete and he was their best player last year offensively. In terms of overall value for a trade though you are not far off, I just don't think it's what CLB is looking for.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 19, 2018 at 3:18 p.m.

Thread: More changes

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>wojohawk</b></div><div>Pass from Chicago. Hayes didn't want to play in Chicago in the first place, so why move assets for him now? Maybe it is jilted girlfriend syndrome, but I don't see the Hawks and Hayes as a match. I would rather give some of our young wing prospects the ice time and draft a good future (or trade for a part I like better then Hayes) with #27. Sproul is a UFA that we can sign ourselves and we don't really need a 3rd pairing RD as we have the most expensive one in the league under contract until there is a compliance buyout option. Kidding aside, unless we move a RD separately, we really don't need one as we have 3 under contract and last years first 2 picks look very good in the pipeline with a decent chance the #8OA best option may end up being a RD again.</div></div>

Yeah those are valid points and I considered that Hayes didn't sign in Chicago, was already aware of that. Sproul's only an UFA if he's not qualified otherwise he would be a RFA.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14, 2018 at 11:07 a.m.

Thread: Chiraq

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hockeyplayer1</b></div><div>Teams generally don't pay salary on LTIR. Insurance usually covers that.</div></div>

Yeah you're right I actually forgot about that, regardless though it helps Chicago to move the cap hit

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 14, 2018 at 9:28 a.m.

Thread: Ottawa

As a Sens fan (I know how unfortunate) I would accept this trade.

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 13, 2018 at 8:55 a.m.

Thread: A Question About Mike Hoffman

we need to give the Atlantic Ocean another asset to take on such a liability

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 12, 2018 at 4:44 p.m.

Thread: Car blockbuster-making sense of the rumors

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Darling isn't an asset, it's a cap dump. Hawks are fine without him, but willing to take a risk to see if they can find magic again with him. Bottom line, he was awful last year and Carolina wants to dump him.</div></div>

LOL how's Hossa an asset either? Atleast the Hawks get a live body back who played well for them, his contract is cheaper than Hossa's and one year shorter plus it might lower the cost to acquire Faulk if Carolina includes him, you can put Hossa on LTIR but his cap hit only comes off once you reach the ceiling and even then I'm not sure the entire contract comes off. This scenario makes sense for both teams because Hawks take a smaller cap hit while Carolina just pays the low cost of Hossa's remaining contract. All I'm suggesting is that there's no way the Hawks take Darling unless a contract isn't sent the other way but for some reason you seem to disagree

Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 12, 2018 at 3:46 p.m.

Thread: Car blockbuster-making sense of the rumors

Thinking if Darling goes to the Hawks then Hossa comes back the other way

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

slamdunk

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day