DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
swinny
Member Since
Mar. 19, 2017
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
2nd Favourite Team
Ottawa Senators
Forum Posts
4517
Posts per Day
1.8
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 28 at 8:19 p.m.
Thread:
Next Season Kings
Kind of surprised not to see Clarke on the roster. Gotta think he is ready to male the jump
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25 at 9:51 p.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames pt2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>Brannstrom needs to start playing with better players... Josh Brown in 2021-22, Nick Holden (the declined version) in 2022-23 and Travis Hamonic (declined version as well) in 2023-24
Dube is good on the PK so he could also be good 5v5 and Pinto + Joseph could really help that like you said
I think I'd do that deal
Tkachuk - Stutzle - Giroux
Greig - Norris - Batherson
Dube - Pinto - Joseph
Pretty damn good Top-9
Use the savings from not re-signing Kubalik and Tarasenko to shore up the RD side
Sanderson - Zub
Chabot - RHD
Chychrun - JBD/Guenette
Only miss a new GM and a new coaching staff</div></div>
Now I have to do an ACGM to see how that would come together lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25 at 6:27 p.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames pt2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xspyrit</b></div><div>Yeah, trading Brannstrom for a young-ish forward is the way to go but only after the current season as Brannstrom is needed right now. Dube could provide good offense but I'd like somebody who is better defensively
Basically, I'd like to trade Brann for a younger Joseph type
Also, if you get him, play him on the 2nd pair with Weegar and watch him flourish. Harris is decent but Brannstrom is better and has more upside</div></div>
Yes. That deal would be an offseason move..... both being RFAs, see it as a hockey deal.
Fair feedback on wanting a better defensive forward, but I wonder if Pinto and Joseph mask that shortcoming...... at least that was my thought process.
And could see him playing with Weegar...... just as that point, I think Harris maybe more polished. Brännström has been a project, but one that is really rounding put well.
Good feedback!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 11:05 a.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>They move Cuylle and suddenly there’s a 3LW hole lol
Rangers would just target a cheaper option then. Not worth losing a current and future roster player for a rental</div></div>
Or you move Goodrow to 3rd line LW and Wheeler plays 4th line centre....... which Goodrow is solid but the contract yikes!
Like I said, I get the reluctance. Not really sure there is a cheaper option at this point giving the Rangers that kind of impact in the top 6.
Certainly, that can change..... only 20 games in
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 11:01 a.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>Leafs decline again lol how does zadorov bring back over twice the amount tanev does? I’ll give you a hint he doesn’t lol</div></div>
Beg to differ.....
Tanev, 33 with a lengthy injury history. Better player when healthy, maybe But, I stress when healthy.
Zadarov, 28 lacks that injury history.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 10:56 a.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames pt2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>Ghostisbere was good for AZ 31 pts in 58 games good at age 29... And he went for a 3rd...
Most players (including Savard) went for double retention and others had term and RFA control (Sandin should come to mind)... Z doesn't have either...
I wouldn't be completely surprised if Z went for a 1st... But I think the Flames should guarantee it by having him and Tanev packaged up at 50% or have a 3rd team retain 50% on 1 of the players)</div></div>
Ghost is a defensive nightmare..... but can run a PP....
I seriously upgraded version of Klingberg. Why he only got a 3rd.
2. My therapist told me to box and block the Sandin deal. (Dubas got ripped there imo.... more than a 1st there should have been had).
4. The double retention in Savard was an additional 4th over the 1st and 3rd the Jackets recieved..... which was an option I looked at, but the Leafs simply lack the assets to pull that off.
3. Packaging Zadarov and Tanev could very well happen. But I also believe the Flames get more in separate moves.
When it comes to Zadarov, right now, the Canucks, Devils (see Tanev), and Kings (yes Kings) I see being in on him..... which if it comes to a bidding war, drives the price..... where pundits are suggesting he gets a 1st.
Time will tell....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 10:41 a.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames pt2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Smitty426</b></div><div>thought out moves
Tanev/Siegs are <strong>shutdown pair</strong> <strong>not **** down pair</strong> I am assuming? :tearsofjoy</div></div>
Lol. Um yes. Big thumbs.🤣
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 10:41 a.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames pt2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>At 50% retention...
And I could name more recent acquisitions that went for less: Schenn, Bogosian, Lyubushkin, Petry, Edmunson (50% retention), Durzi, Klingberg, Ghost just to name a few... And a bunch of these got 50% retention or had RFA control after the season...</div></div>
And the Jackets recieved an additional 3rd for the retention; which if you read what I had to say, I wasn't bothering with as this is a Flames thread.
Out of your list of compatibles, only Schenn holds an argument..... who at 33 years of age when the Leafs made the move, was likely to get less. Why I don't see Tanev getting a 1st like most Flames fans would want. At full value.... he is a 3rd unfortunately. At 28, and having extension possibilities, as Savard to Tampa did, the tag is what it is going to be.
The rest of that list were simply cap dumps or don't measure up to Zadarov's play, or in Petey's case going to Detroit, doing right by the player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 10:33 a.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rags21</b></div><div>You can have picks and a lesser prospect from the Rangers. Lindholm is strictly a rental</div></div>
Yes he is strictly a rental, but aside.from Lafreniere (who is having a mini coming out party), the Ranger RW is weak.
I get not wanting to give up Cuylle, but the Rangers could go..... and ya gotta pay to play.
Where moving Cuylle sits really depends on where the Ranger are with Otthmann.....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 10:23 a.m.
Thread:
Shot down in Flames pt2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Leafsfan98</b></div><div>What comps to Z have gotten a 1st?</div></div>
Savard a few years back.
Gonna be a robust market for him. I think it takes a 1st....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 22 at 8:53 a.m.
Thread:
Walker is a good fit
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bennecon</b></div><div>With how he’s been playing that is not nearly enough, plus Philly is like second in the division and super stubborn anyway so I don’t think anyone will be traded.</div></div>
Yes, defintley having a career year start, but historically, I think this package is pretty bang on.... Walker is solid; but he has never done anything like this before. Not even close - so to pay more would be very much buyer beware.
Further, agreed. Right now the Flyers ride the wave; but I am.one to question how long they really stock around. A smarter GM would embrace the rebuild fully...... because if they don't I would be eyeing up Ronnie Attard......
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 18 at 10:41 p.m.
Thread:
the answer 2
Considering just how thin the Oilers system is, moving 3 years of 1sts and 2nds is definitely not the solution.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 18 at 10:39 p.m.
Thread:
Boom bang
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KingofRnR</b></div><div>Hope you’re having Fun Fries, but these Trades do nothing for MTL or CGY, so they both decline</div></div>
Well, the Montreal deal makes some sense.
Depending in where Gorton and Hughes see Reinbacher and Mailloux, the Habs could very well have a logjam at RD..... and a significant one at that.
Now, if either is ready next year, does making a move to get out of the last year of Savard's deal make sense? Sure does. I'm not saying the Leafs aren't moving some window dressing there, but speaking strictly from a cap/personal perspective, it isn't a horrible idea. Defintely seen worse on CF.
Now.... that Flames deal - that is a horrible idea.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 15 at 10:14 a.m.
Thread:
2024
1. You are so far removed on what value of Carlo Sweeney will think you are running a junior C team. He may call the police for a wellness check. Yes.... it is that bad.
2. The Flames deal is intersting, but one Calgary turns down...... they simply are flush with forwards. Moving 2 D for more forwards simply doesn't fit.
3. With Hughes and Hamilton the Devils don't need another offensive D...... if anything they are looking to shore up defensively - something Klingber will not help with
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 12 at 4:26 p.m.
Thread:
Sharks
I think it would be significantly wiser.to sign those UFAs to 1 year deals..... so you have movable assets at the TDL.
Last thing the Sharks need are players with term.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 12 at 3:43 p.m.
Thread:
Dump Klingberg and Reaves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>I think Klingberg being involved is highly unlikely. Retention is actually realistic</div></div>
Possibly right there. Klingberg males the money work.
I see more a throw in than part if the real return there.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 12 at 3:43 p.m.
Thread:
maybe
You also cannot look at players in a microcosm.
Do they fit needs, systems. Does their skill set possibly augment another's?
Maybe that explains JVR's fountain of youth season?
Or Wheeler as a Ranger?
Peeke fits a need, he fits a system, and with Giordano, learns.
What a horrible idea.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 11 at 10:45 p.m.
Thread:
maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>It takes a 3rd to dump each of them maybe 2 3rds for klingberg and reaves or a first to dump all of them I’ve got several Chicago accepts for sending a 1st and a 3rd to them for Mrazek with all 3 of them</div></div>
Oh, I have to disagree here..... more than a 3rd in this climate to dump those contracts.
But, if the Hawks fans wanna do that.... gotta say sign up. Not that I would ever want Mrzarek back.... that was a tire fire.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 11 at 10:42 p.m.
Thread:
Dump Klingberg and Reaves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>I do think steeves has gotta be worth a 3rd honestly maybe not to you guys but he’s ripping it up in the AHL right now I want to see him up to the nhl</div></div>
Not sure he is worth a 3rd, but there is positive value. Definitely not to Calgary.
Sharks maybe? Has certainly been consistent as a Marlie, but it is his workhorse ethic that will land him an NHL job.
Realistically, if Calen Addison was moved for a 5th and a project, Steeves maybe nets that 5th.
A 3rd seems lofty.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 11 at 10:38 p.m.
Thread:
maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>Whatever better then paying to dump him should be able to dump samsonov reaves and klingberg for a 1st</div></div>
Ummmmm..... have you looked at cap situations?
If you think that, you need to do some homework.
Dumping Klingberg can be done, but if you think that will be for pennies on the dollar, well, you are mistaking.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 11 at 10:35 p.m.
Thread:
Dump Klingberg and Reaves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>Flames decline and stop taking our calls lol</div></div>
This issue is the Flames are swimming in forwards..... and with more moves likely to come, neither Steeves or Holmgren are going to move the needle for the Flames. Not one ioda. Hell, Steeves would have a better chance of making the Leafs roster than he would Calgary's lol. Holmgren maybe wins a 4C roll, and that is a strong, emphasized maybe.
If Zadorov is coming to Toronto, it maybe safe to assume Klingberg is part of the return. But my thoughts here is that with Klingberg looking more like a cap dump than a player swap, it is either a high pick or Neimela being packaged up.
A realist Leafs fan.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 11 at 10:28 p.m.
Thread:
maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>Yeah they don’t pay the difference between a 1st and 2 3rds in value to dump a guy terrible asset management we’d waive him if he has that much negative value</div></div>
OK. So the Leafs waive him. Who takes him? That is $3 million in dead cap space, which is almost worse than playing him right now.
Am I a fan of moving the 1st? Absolutely not. But the Klingberg experiment (one I never liked) has died a horrible death - and for a team in win now mode, ya pay to play. Peeke as a 3rd pairing guy? I do that. Roslovic, as I said last, presents options.
This deal as constructed has merit imo.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 11 at 10:21 p.m.
Thread:
maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RipNasty</b></div><div>I don't see why TO would do this. Peeke isn't very good. And there is no need for Roslovic. I would be happy to see Klingberg go but I doubt Treliving will pay to move him for much, that would be way too much egg on the face for him to do. For better or worse they have Klingberg or move him as a cap maneuver as part of a bigger trade.</div></div>
Peeke is solid, but probably not a top 4 D at this time. Still on the younger side. Hard to say he is no good when the team last year was terrible. People on CF say the same thing about Connor Murphy, yet, I say he is one of the top 10 stay at home D in the league. Bad teams don't do decent players justice.
Roslovic I see the point. But, I counter that with saying this simply put ls Reaves in the press box, and either Roslovic or Jarnkrok tale that 4th line roll - which in turn significantly improves not only the defensive play of that line, but it would actually be a bit of an offensive threat as well.
I say this deal would have to be considered.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 11 at 10:15 p.m.
Thread:
maybe
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kinger25</b></div><div>Leafs decline</div></div>
I dunno about that.
Peeke is kind of the sort of player the Leafs need in the back end.... nothing flashy, and certainly is a physical element, who is signed until 2025.
Roslovic could gives the Leafs all sorts of options on how to construct the top 9..... and since he can play C, would give the Buds 5 legit centremen. Roslovic's decrease in ice time is more a function of Fantelli, Johnston and Sillinger (younger and simply better) than an indictment on his play. Solid two-way player good for 40 points.
All that for a contract dump and a 1st? I consider that. I consider that big time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Oct. 30 at 4:26 p.m.
Thread:
Post Heritage Classic Clarity
And what does Tamp do when Vaz comes back?🤔
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2023 CapFriendly.com