DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
swinny
Member Since
Mar. 19, 2017
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
2nd Favourite Team
Ottawa Senators
Forum Posts
4679
Posts per Day
1.8
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3 at 6:36 p.m.
Thread:
Hughes MO
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>By "B prospects" I was referring to Heineman and Kidney. I view Barron as an A prospect, and we Anaheim guys have frequently said that we would accept Barron and the Montreal 2024 first for Zegras -- <strong>IF</strong> he were on the market, which he isn't. Contrary to what you may have read back East, Zegras is a fan favorite, coaches favorite and team favorite.</div></div>
Like I said, I question why he is in the rumour mill. Makes no sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3 at 6:31 p.m.
Thread:
Hughes MO
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>littlejerryseinfeld</b></div><div>These might be C prospects</div></div>
Disagree.
Barron is a victim of a logjam imo. The talent is there. Needs to play to develop it at the NHL level.
Heineman is scoring at a PPG pace in the AHL..... much like Rousek or Rosén (knowing you a Sabres fan).
An agree to disagree situation.... but defintely more than C prospects.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3 at 6:27 p.m.
Thread:
Hughes MO
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>An A prospect at the position of need is fine, but two B prospects and a pick almost guaranteed to be no earlier than 25 isn't enough.
No Slafkovsky, no Reinbacher, no Montreal 2024 first, no incentive whatsoever to trade Trevor Zegras, who isn't on the market.</div></div>
Gotta be honest...... I wouldn't be opposed to moving the Montreal 1st here.
I do view both Barron amd Heineman being better than B prospects (and I am not a Habs fan). By no means bluechip, but defintely will have excellent NHL careers.
It's Zegras.
I question why he is in the rumour mill - a sentiment I have brought uo many times. But you gotta play with it.
As a Leafs fan, I could have gone that direction, but let's be honest..... it would just be insulting.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3 at 6:23 p.m.
Thread:
Oh the tangled webs we weave
Can only retain 3 salaries.....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 4:37 p.m.
Thread:
Devils all in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MisstheWhalers</b></div><div>I think NJ would be crazy to trade Mercer or Holtz and especially for a LHD, just don't see the need for Hanifin in NJ.
Also they're not exactly flush on the wings, Palat is older, Toffoli isn't getting younger and is a UFA, they need to keep their young talent.
A 1st, Vanacek and Bahl should be plenty for Markstrom imo.</div></div>
I hear you on Hanafin, but that would be a sick top 6. Sick.
Looking further out, I don't think Hamilton finishes that contract in New Jersey. Why I marked Hanafin as a target. As well, Jersey is listed as one of 4 teams he is rumoured to sign long term with.
But, like I said, short term see the point.....
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 26 at 4:33 p.m.
Thread:
Devils all in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Change Mercer to Holtz…(seems to be the guy CGY wants anyway). Remove Hatakka and Vanecek (sounds like CGY’s latest was to remove Vitek). And add some retention on Markstrom….maybe a 3rd to cover it.</div></div>
I know the Flames would have little.use for Vanacek, added him as more to make $$$ work.
The feedback is solid.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 10:00 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline Take 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>xcanuck28</b></div><div>Im a big fan of D petterson, great prospect, size and grit etc. But what a nightmare itll be if we have 2 Elias Pettersons on the team lol</div></div>
It may confuse a few American play-by-play guys🤣🤣
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 9:39 p.m.
Thread:
Arizona
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kash</b></div><div>Moser can play both sides yes - but ARZ will most likely not trade him because of his age; he's having a stellar season right now.</div></div>
He is fantastic period. Even last year he made his mark. The guy they build around I think. Very underrated......
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 9:38 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline Take 2
I have to say that Staois should take that and run.
Pettersson (the defenseman) is a helluva nice looking prospect. Soup has a lot.of energy.
Really a solid offer that shouldn't be passed up.
But Vatrano is a pipe dream. If Detroit is in the running, Solderblom is very likely going the other way, and he checks off every Verbeek box.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 9:33 p.m.
Thread:
Arizona
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>kash</b></div><div>Durzi is NOT what Toronto needs, Crouse is good but for the right assets.</div></div>
You beat me to it lol.
Moser would he the target imo..... and I don't see that happening.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 25 at 9:31 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs Full In Depth Offseason for 2024-25
1. The second line is a defensive black hole.
1a. I want nothing to do with Duclair. There is a reason he has been passed around the league.
2. I honestly think Minten benefits from a year with the Marlies. Zero need to rush him into the line up
3. I for one do not like the Tanev fit at all. Other options. Cheaper options.
4. I like the Carrier addition. Does more then many think.
5. Kahkonen is a gamble, but I have always thought he could be a solid split time tender. Feel last year was an outlier. Frankly for that money, I would sooner go with the more proven DeSmith, but this isn't horrible. Just don't see him getting over $3 million.
5. Overall, the forward core lacks tenacity. Knies has it. McMann can mic it up. Domi is a pest. And then..... um.... flat out need more.
Overall:
This isn't it. Team is too soft overall.
Top 6 on the blueline is much better, but then nothing. If this season has proved anything, the Leafs need a top 8. Where is it? A couple injuries and this team is in serious trouble.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 6:50 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TJTwolf</b></div><div>Not all Avs fans see Allen as a good idea. I personally see it as a totally bad one if only because the Avs won't be able to afford him even with 50% retention going into the second year. It eats into any cap they have for a 2C (assuming they move RyJo somehow). Jones WOULD be a better option imo, but I simply don't see him having that value.</div></div>
RyJo was a bad idea from the beginning.....
So what value do you out on Jones as a rental? Curious now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 6:02 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TJTwolf</b></div><div>Yes I noticed it and still a no.</div></div>
Not sure how your fanbase sees a shakier Allen being worth a 3rd outright, but I can roll with the opinion.
Ideally he should be in around 3rd. The numbers would support that...... even last years in Seattle when you compare them to this year's Allen.
Tried to be inventive..... sometime you win, sometimes you don't
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 5:53 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GolfBall</b></div><div>Ok on the Sharks deal. Robertson playing well so it stings a bit, but a longer term right d with cheap contract makes the sting go away.</div></div>
Exactly my thinking.....
Really moving from a position of strength.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 5:49 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TJTwolf</b></div><div>LOL! Such an easy no for the Avs and Jones isn't close to that value.</div></div>
Since everyone is missing the 4th rounder attached to Jones, I am gonna ask of you noticed that.
Moving back 60 picks. Big cost🙄
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Feb. 23 at 3:41 p.m.
Thread:
Habs should considering buyout Gally and Dvorack
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ht42</b></div><div>Agree with that, but I really don't see any realistic scenario that he will gonna give us somes assets.</div></div>
Cap space is King.
Think outside the box.
The Canucks will be in the market I think, Teddy has out priced himself there, and Hronek and Petterson are priorities.
Could see the Leafs kick the can on that too.... blueline priorities.
Can we all say Tampa? They still have cap issues.
The Avs.... Cap issues again, and a serious upgrade on RyJo.
Hughes could easily get a 3rd here. Maybe a 2nd just because he is Hughes.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 3:34 p.m.
Thread:
Depth and more
Ruzicka maybe a big body, but he doesn't use it. McMann does......
That Philly deal is beyond horrible. Neimela maybe undersized, but he is looking awefullt good with the Marlies. Moving not only the top, but only notable defensive prospect the Leafs for a rental is terrible asset management.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Feb. 23 at 3:30 p.m.
Thread:
Habs should considering buyout Gally and Dvorack
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ht42</b></div><div>Multiple reasons.
1st : both of them are right now very useless for the Habs. Dvorack is always injeured sadly and Gallagher can't anymore follow the game due to accumulation of injuries. Also, Gallagher makes right now somes unnecessary and bad penalties who can cost the game (and he did it one yesterday).
2nd : that's open more than 9M in their cap space for the next season. They can add somes refresh players in the line-up, and you give-up on somes other Bergevin's heritage players.....
3rd : Dvorack and Gallagher have a negative value, especially Gallagher. And Kent Hughes don't like to paid for dumping away a contract (imagine the cost to dump Gallagher's contract away........)</div></div>
I think you really undervalue Dvorak.
He isn't worth the contract. He was never a 2C.
Eat half the last year, and you likely get an asset.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 3:25 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brandoncrowell91</b></div><div>not getting a 2nd for jones, no sense in buying trenin the rental when holmberg and mcmann are just as good. could probably get more elsewhere for robertson</div></div>
Again, I flipped picks.🤦♂️
Holmberg remains waiver exempt, why I would look at the Trenin deal. Keefe has a way of not playing his bench, so having more experience on it may have him actually trying to do it. Trenin amd Gregor are significantly nastier than Holmberg and Gregor.
Lastly, you maybe get more for Robertson, but, for what Burroughs can do (he is playing significant minutes for the Sharks) with 2 years behind this one at $1.1 million, Robertson is very likely the price tag. Not sure how much better one does in a Roberston deal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 23 at 3:24 p.m.
Thread:
Deadline thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xqb15a</b></div><div>Martin Jones isn’t worth a 5th thinking he is worth a 2nd is hilarious.</div></div>
I flipped picks there bud. I know Jones isn't worth a 2nd, but I will argue his season has him in 3rd round range.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Feb. 23 at 3:23 p.m.
Thread:
Habs should considering buyout Gally and Dvorack
Buying out Gallagher would be a tough decision. Heart and soul player.... and one whose presence in the locker room I am sure is respected.
Dvorak? No, I think retaining 50% he is more than tradable. What you expected was a 2nd line centre. We never was, and was never going to be that. But as a 3C, he is above average. I think a $2.25 million Dvorak would look appealing to some clubs looking for a short term fix. Further, the UFA market may have options, but I am of the opinion guys like Wennberg, Novak or Bleudger all see $3 million. So I would try amd move him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 4 at 10:00 p.m.
Thread:
big moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canesfan21_</b></div><div>Minny isn’t trading their Calder candidate D man for a pile of stuff</div></div>
That actually maybe in the top 5 worst trade proposals I have ever seen on CF.
1. Minny would want a relative Faber replacement, and Neimela isn't that
2. Choose one of Minten, Cowan or Knies.....
3. Add a 1st rounder the Leafs simply don't have to give.
4. Spike Guerin's drink
Is Faber a player the Leafs would want? Yup. Absolutely. But at least attempt to make an offer. Faber is a stud now..... what he will be in 5 years may have him in some Norris conversations.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 5:47 p.m.
Thread:
Perry contract will be announced on sunday reports say
It is a great pick up imo. What the bottom six needs in Edmonton......
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 2:17 p.m.
Thread:
Fire Keefe what you waiting for
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_92</b></div><div>You just made my point even further about the roster not being good enough.. Keefe has to over play the core 4 because the depth isn’t good enough. A third line of Robertson-Domi-Jarnkrok is terrible defensively. You can’t trust that so you have to give more defensive minutes to the guys he trusts in his own end.. like Matthews and Marner.</div></div>
No I didn't.
You want to win a division, play the big 4. And that isn't happening.
You want to win in the playoffs? Manage your bench over 82 games, then play the big 4 more in the playoffs.
He doesn't play his bench. Ever. Where I agree the Roberston-Domi-Jarkrok 3rd unit was bad defensively, they were on the positive side of the goal differential ledger. So there is that. Even that 4th line of Gregor-Kampf-McMann isn't horrible. It does what it is supposed to do.
And he has certainly had better depth than this in the past..... same strategy. Same results. For how many years?
I will never say this team should have won a Cup by now, but it is also fair to say they should have won more than 1 playoff series in 5 years.
I will maintain - Tortarella's team is not as good. Yet, they are winning games. He plays his bench.....
Nashville, no where near as good on paper, running with the Leafs, because they play the bench.
I can do this all day. Top end talent is great. But if you don't manage minutes, it ends in 1st round losses year after year after year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 21 at 11:44 a.m.
Thread:
Fire Keefe what you waiting for
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ryminister_92</b></div><div>To be fair to Keefe as well, I saw this stat and this makes your point about the fan base perfectly. Over Keefe’s career he’s rarely lost 4 games straight. And when he does, they bounce back strong:
2020-21: 0-3-2 ➡️ 7-0-2
2021-22: 0-3-1 ➡️ 15-2-1
2022-23: 0-2-2 ➡️ 15-1-4
2023-24: 0-2-2 ➡️ 11-2-4
The fab base likes to be irrational and emotional when things aren’t going right. It’s ridiculous. Like a couple users told me earlier: “Keefe only has a good record because of the core 4” - so they can blame the core 4 players for the wins but can’t hold them accountable for their loses? HAH. It’s no wonder why players don’t like signing in Toronto.</div></div>
Who said we as a fanbase don't hold the core 4 accountable?
That I'd an awefully bold assertion. Out of the core 4, the only one whose playoff performance isn't crotiqued is (shockingly) Nylander. He finds a way to produce.
Leafs fans are brutally harsh on Marner's offense going cold. Harsh on Matthews as well.
Oh no. We do hold them accountable.
But here is the flip side.
Keefe's deployment of the 4 over the course of an 82 game season has them playing around 23 minutes a game. So, how much gas is left in the tank when it matters? Now Nylander, sees about 20 minutes..... and is ready for the show. In form, not burnt out.
Keefe has has a bench, but has rarely used it.
This is not to suggest the fanbase doesn't recognize the big guys don't need to find another gear. They definitely do.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com