SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

vikhodush

Member Since
May 13, 2017
Favourite Team
Carolina Hurricanes
2nd Favourite Team
Washington Capitals
Forum Posts
6694
Posts per Day
2.9
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 1 at 9:12 a.m.
Thread: Bag Terry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>McRanteskog</b></div><div>“In my eyes, value should be closer to two 1sts and Necas for Terry. I’d use that as a basis of a trade” is what I said.

Basis definition being “the underlying support or foundation for an idea, argument, or process.”

Which means my comment should read that Necas plus the firsts for Terry should be the foundation of the trade (the trade as a whole, not specifically just the CAR package).

Your offer of Necas + 2nd + B prospect probably isn’t enough. But now we are being hypocritical as to what’s the difference between two late firsts versus a 2nd and B prospect? B prospects come from 1st round picks all the time (especially late late firsts). Are we talking a late 2nd? Early 2nd? There’s not a whole lot of difference between pick #28 and pick #34 (CAR owns PHI 2024 2nd rd pick)</div></div>

Don’t really think it’s hypocritical unless we’re twisting words. I’ll clarify though - Necas, Canes 2nd and somebody like Koivunen. Probably not enough, but that’s fine and pretty much my point.
Forum: Armchair-GMAug. 1 at 8:08 a.m.
Thread: Bag Terry
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>McRanteskog</b></div><div>Like you said, ANA aren’t motivated to move Terry unless they felt it was an overpay. Terry is the better player, there’s no debate there. You’re also not considering that those two firsts are late late last 4-5 picks of the round ( marginally better than say two ARI 2nds).

You should also read over the last sentence of my comment again and familiarize yourself with the definition of “basis”. Maybe ANA needs to throw in a 3rd rd pick, maybe a prospect, who knows, but the package I noted is what I’d expect the framework of this hypothetical deal to be.

You’re more than welcome to chime in and outline what your trade package expectations to be</div></div>

Yeah, I’m considering all of that which is why I said that might be what it would take for ANA to move the kid but it also wouldn’t ever be considered from CAR vantage point if they’re expecting Necas AND two firsts. That’s just a bonkers price regardless of them being in the latter half of the draft.

If I’m moving Necas in this deal it’s Necas a second and a B prospect for Terry at best. Which gets shot down and we go out separate ways. Terry is better but the difference isn’t that big.

Btw the definition of basis is that’s a starting point which makes your comment read like CAR starts there and potentially adds more. Hope that clears it up for you.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 25 at 8:05 a.m.
Thread: Red Wings trade deadline
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLLGRW</b></div><div>You're the troll dude, Sprong can score goals which the Canes struggle to do and Alex Lyon got the Florida Panthers in the playoffs and is a cheaper backup opinion.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLLGRW</b></div><div>Only three players on your team had more goals than Sprong last season</div></div>

The canes have 3 goalies better than Lyon. They had Lyon in their system and chose to let him walk rather than keeping him for league minimum bc they’ve got goalies better than him, it’s fairly simple to understand.

Sprong is a defensive liability and a poor system fit for the canes. He’s a fourth liner (just like he’s been throughout his career) on the canes. You’re too thick to figure that out though.

Keep trolling. 🤡
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 24 at 7:46 p.m.
Thread: Leafs W
No.
Forum: Armchair-GMJul. 24 at 5:51 p.m.