SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

westleysnipez

westleysnipez
Member Since
Jun. 9, 2022
Favourite Team
Vancouver Canucks
2nd Favourite Team
Seattle Kraken
Forum Posts
1368
Posts per Day
2.1
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 6 at 1:52 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 6 at 1:26 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bcarlo25</b></div><div>oh, so these aren't reports, it's just your guess work?

Moore was not LTIR, he was buried in providence and was a multi year cap dump.

So let's look at what it actually was
Lindholm 50% retained for, 1st, prospect that the bruins had given up on (where he was drafted doesn't matter, he stunk), 2nd+2nd+multi year cap dump.

now, so long as these aren't actually insider reports that you suggested and just stuff we're making up, we don't know how much the money side of things played a role. It may well be that those two seconds were for retention and taking on a multi year cap dump. I think that's a stretch, but I think it's probably pretty fair to assume that the cap dump and retention cost more than a 2nd round pick. Vaakainanen was a bit of a throw in at that stage, so lets say the finances were a 2nd and him. does a 1st and a 2nd for a number one d man sound like a clear "they paid up for the extension," scenario.


so i guess i would say if there are insider reports, please share. if we're going to guess, let's get the facts straight.</div></div>

You wanted an example, I gave one using your team.

Moore played 18 games between the NHL and AHL, he was on LTIR at the time of the trade and never played for the Ducks or Gulls. He was on LTIR.

You said the difference would be a 3rd. I have shown that the difference is a top prospect + 2nd. It isn't guess work, it's a direct comparison between two players traded to the same team, one with an extension in place and one without.

But since you keep refuting it without an insider proof:

https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/john-klingberg-worth-trade-contract-extension/

"So the baseline for Klingberg in a trade would seem to start with Ristolainen and Faulk, two fine defenders who you'd likely put beneath Klingberg on a depth chart. Ideally, the Stars would find a trade partner who could sign Klingberg immediately to an extension, and thus drive the price up further."

"The price for Klingberg probably starts at a first-round pick and a top prospect in the system, then goes up if Klingberg can work out a re-sign as part of the deal. His agent is talking to teams, after all."

https://www.dailyfaceoff.com/news/trade-targets-noah-hanifin-is-holding-the-calgary-flames-hostage-in-trade-talks

The Hanifin file has been a grind for the Flames, as Hanifin’s camp is more or less holding the trade process hostage, flexing his power as a pending free agent to sway interested suitors. Officially, Hanifin can only block a trade to eight teams via his limited ‘no-trade’ clause. In reality, all Hanifin’s camp has to do is quietly signal to an interested party that he will not be willing to sign there long-term and it effectively kills the potential of a deal... The net result may be a return the Flames feel isn’t commensurate with his value.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22 at 10:25 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22 at 2:49 p.m.
Thread: buch
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22 at 12:57 p.m.
Thread: buch