Member Since
Mar. 25, 2021
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
Posts per Day
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 23, 2022 at 10:05 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 20, 2022 at 3:36 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 20, 2022 at 1:40 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 20, 2022 at 1:21 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LIRIK</b></div><div>Your first answer was : How come 23 points in 65 games for 1 season costs a first to move but 32 points in 69 games fir multiple years is worth a first?

My point is Anderson is way more than points. Teams need those potato and meat type of players.

I was only talking about goals because the other guy was arguing Anderson is not a 25 goals scorer, which he clearly is.

I'm the one trying to say Anderson is more than just points. You're the one saying he's bad because of his low point production.

You're right, all teams pay for analytics departments. However, that's just more info they get. Teams choose if they use it or not after. MTL had bad analytics when they reach SCF.

You still can't find when i said Anderson is worth a 1st because i feel like it? Maybe it's because i never said it, and you're making up stuff.

Again, i'll note your name, and when Anderson is traded for a 1st in term of value, we'll talk again. You probably won't answer just like the others who were wrong before you.</div></div>

Telling yourself he’s a 25 goal scorer is lying to yourself. I’d love to see the time they handed out the Rocket Richard to the guy on pace for the most goals, I would hope you’re smarter than that.

You feel like Anderson is worth a first in spite of his negative even strength possession numbers, consistently underperforming to his contract, 36 point 82 game average. That’s just your feelings instead of looking at numbers and thinking hey, this guy kinda stinks for 5.5 a year.

Please note my name, it reaffirms the petulance and insecurity I mentioned above. You can’t see how noting names on a website about fake hockey teams is pathetic right? At best you get to pat yourself in the back.. that’s you’re bar, you can see where I get the feeling that you should be embarrassed right?
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 20, 2022 at 12:37 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 19, 2022 at 1:47 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 19, 2022 at 12:54 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>Barron was a 1st so he got a 1st and a 2nd.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jonh514</b></div><div>Also... Goals and assists have different value... But you knew that already</div></div>

They got a B+ prospect and a last 3rd of the 2nd round pick.. there’s a real life tangible return that anyone can find and you’re trying to convince yourself it’s a 1st.. that’s weird. By your own logic Calgary should be able to trade Zary, Pelletier, Coronato, this years 1st for Caufield right? That’s 4 first round picks, be crazy to turn down 4 1st round picks. More than they’d get in a top tier offer sheet right?

Goals can be weighted differently sure, but if you’d like to look at the whole picture as opposed to cherry picking, Lehkonen plays significantly better D, analytics darling, was analytically great on the worst team in the league last year, Lehkonen had a 1.4 G/60 with Colorado last year, 0.9 with Montreal, Anderson had 1.0, now Anderson has a 1.4 this season and Lehkonen 0.9 but is that strictly goal production worth a million dollars more this year? all while getting out produced in every other facet of the game?

None of the above even brings the wildly bad contract into context, 4 years of an average 36 points/82 games at 5.5 million and you want a similar return to 34 points/82 games at 1.15M and an expiring RFA..Montreal also got paid for the retention in that deal increasing the return. Ignore everything else in this comment other than the last paragraph. Just answer this part above
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 18, 2022 at 2:02 p.m.