Sure from Detroit.

Adam Larsson and Marner should not be together in a 1 for 1 trade

I was leaning no, but we can probably turn around and flip either of those guys easier than it is to move Fabbri for anything of value.

Both of those guys have decent positive value. They could actually get roster spots too. Also saves us cap. Robertson could actually get time at 2/3LW and Lily on the right side.
Defense like this:
Walman - Seider
Edvinsson - Roy
Chiarot - Liljegren
Could move on from Petry. Lily could be a powerplay option for us.

can you make your point?
Marner is at a similar value than Hall was at the point of original deal with NJ..Leafs get a shut down RHD to go with Reilly and anchor the PK and save cap space..and Marner would be a better fit in Seatle out of the spotlight and he could help Wright reach a new level. (that ws my logic but Im interested in your argument)

Well the difference is is that marner is a proven better player than Hall and Larsson is significantly older than when he was traded for Hall, if Marner were to be traded it would be for not one single player and that player would probably be a star calibre player as well

i disagree on both fronts
heres my argument
Hall has won a Hart trophy and was a 1st overall pick..Marner is not better at this point.
Larson is a top pair stud RHD at a great cap hit which augments his value.

And of course Marner has a NTC which also lowers his value as does the fact he only hs 1 year left then becomes UFA...
Counter argument? Where do you believe I am wrong and why?
cheers (i am enjoying the banter)
ps we all know that if Mitch doesnt want to waive his NTC he gonna be here another year..id im brad and that is what i am dealt, i pivot and trade rielly to upgrade g or d