The downside on couturier is insane compared to Norris

Dont know about this, even Couturier's production and play this year (after 2 years of being out) to get 38pts in 74 games is an accomplishment on that poor offensive club.

Both are as iffy as each other, but Norris in four FULL years he has played over 60 games just once, and has had really just ONE good offensive year. I just dont think either team wanbts to replace one risk with the other, especially since theres no cap or contract length advantage.

I agree with everything here - the only thing you can say as an advantage for either team, would be Norris being 5 years younger. I think as the Flyers, I would take this risk. If Coots got back to his PPG ways, than this is obviously moot - but it's clear he lost a step after 20-30 games, seemed a little gassed out there. If Norris ever gets over being perpetually injured, guy could definitely turn into a 1C and that's what we desperately need. I think I'd roll the dice here.

Thats an interesting proposal for nashville. Depending on who is there at 7th overall it would be worth considering. Korpisalo's contract is terrible but manageable. Try hard to get a useful year or two out of him and if it doesnt work out his buyout is manageable. Probably would need to get another vet goalie as well just because Korpisalo is likely going to fail but we got the cap.

OTT will takes their chances with the guy that is 25 over the one that is 31.

that dont get Chabot.

and Saros not worth a top 20 pick, he aint worth the difference between 7th and 22nd and OTT aint spending a first to dump korpi.