SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames

Created by: Montreal1st
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: May 13, 2024
Published: May 13, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
MTL
  1. Kuzmenko, Andrei
  2. 2024 1st round pick (CGY)
CGY
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. 2024 1st round pick (MTL)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
19$83,500,000$68,086,250$1,022,500$4,670,000$15,413,750
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,450,000$4,450,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$4,875,000$4,875,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,400,000$1,400,000
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 13 at 9:23 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,545
Likes: 20,350
Is Lindstrom going to be available at #5? If so Calgary may accept
May 13 at 9:23 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
Lose kuzmenko and I'd do it, Montreal probably wouldn't in that case though.
May 13 at 9:25 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Is Lindstrom going to be available at #5? If so Calgary may accept


I'm gonna say it's about a 50% chance right now
May 13 at 9:26 p.m.
#4
Subbanator
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 7,764
Likes: 3,632
This is an easy pass for the Habs. You get cap space with no guarantee of what it will be used on, no team takes that chance unless they absolutely know they have to clear space, Habs don't need to clear cap space, so like I said, easy no
BorisBagel liked this.
May 13 at 9:28 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,545
Likes: 20,350
Quoting: Shaun80
I'm gonna say it's about a 50% chance right now


No other reason to move up to #5 IMO. We're pretty much guaranteed one of Iginla, Dickinson, or Catton at #9 already.
MoxNix liked this.
May 13 at 9:31 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
No other reason to move up to #5 IMO. We're pretty much guaranteed one of Iginla, Dickinson, or Catton at #9 already.


I agree, I'm perfectly fine picking at 9, if Iginla isn't there it means one of the top defensemen are falling to us.
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
May 13 at 10:48 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 3,475
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Is Lindstrom going to be available at #5? If so Calgary may accept


That's the only way Calgary even considers it.
May 13 at 10:49 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 3,475
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
No other reason to move up to #5 IMO. We're pretty much guaranteed one of Iginla, Dickinson, or Catton at #9 already.


Yakemchuk before Catton.
May 13 at 10:50 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,545
Likes: 20,350
Quoting: MoxNix
Yakemchuk before Catton.


You can keep saying that and I am never going to agree with you
May 13 at 11:05 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 3,475
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
You can keep saying that and I am never going to agree with you


I think Conroy will agree. The plan is to get bigger too not just younger.
May 13 at 11:10 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 39,545
Likes: 20,350
Quoting: MoxNix
I think Conroy will agree. The plan is to get bigger too not just younger.


That doesn't matter to me. I'm not debating this with you again
May 13 at 11:30 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
Quoting: MoxNix
I think Conroy will agree. The plan is to get bigger too not just younger.


I've gotta agree with Ledge_And_Dairy on this one. You're always saying we have too many under sized forwards already and other then pelletier I don't have a clue who you're talking about. Maybe Zarys a little light.
May 13 at 11:43 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 3,475
Edited May 13 at 11:57 p.m.
Quoting: Shaun80
I've gotta agree with Ledge_And_Dairy on this one. You're always saying we have too many under sized forwards already and other then pelletier I don't have a clue who you're talking about. Maybe Zarys a little light.


Pelletier, Coronato, Mangi, most of the higher end prospects drafted under Treliving. Conroy has repeatedly said the team needs to get younger and bigger and he's shown he means it by drafting and trading for bigger players.

Sure you can keep drafting all these little guys based on who put up the most points in junior and be like the Sabres... The pundits keep ranking your prospect system the best in the league but you still can't even make the playoffs after years and years of rebuilding.

Size does matter as do intangibles like grit, competitiveness, physicality, being a team player instead of a me first prima donna focused on personal stats instead of on the team winning games. You can have lots of skill but if you don't have size, grit, etc too (not just in the bottom 6 / on the bottom pair either) you'll get intimidated, pushed around and never go very far in the playoffs.
May 13 at 11:51 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
...
May 13 at 11:53 p.m.
#15
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
Quoting: MoxNix
Pelletier, Coronato, Mangi, most of the higher end prospects drafted under Treliving. Conroy has repeatedly said the team needs to get younger and bigger and he's shown he means it by drafting and trading for bigger players.

Sure you can keep drafting all these little guys based on who put up the most points in junior and be like the Sabres... The pundits keep ranking your prospect system the best in the league but you still can't even make the playoffs after years and years of rebuilding.

Size does matter. You can have lots of skill but if you don't have size and grit too (not just in the bottom 6 / on the bottom pair either) you'll get intimidated, pushed around and never go very far in the playoffs.


Coronato and Mangiapane may be a little shorter then the average NHLer, but they're both built like brick **** houses. They both come in around 185 pounds, yakemchuk is 6'3 and only 8 pounds heavier. The difference with buffalo is all their pospects are 5'9-5'11 and weigh 160 pounds
May 14 at 12:09 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2022
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 3,475
Edited May 14 at 12:19 a.m.
Quoting: Shaun80
Coronato and Mangiapane may be a little shorter then the average NHLer, but they're both built like brick **** houses. They both come in around 185 pounds, yakemchuk is 6'3 and only 8 pounds heavier. The difference with buffalo is all their pospects are 5'9-5'11 and weigh 160 pounds


Yakemchuk is 18 years old, 3 years younger than Coronato and 10 years younger than Mangiapane neither of which weighed near 180 lbs when they were drafted. Yakemchuk has plenty of time to fill out just like those two did. The difference is when he's in his 20's he'll almost certainly be well over 200 lbs.

Yak isn't just another offensive defenseman who put up a lot of points either. He plays a physical game too and physicality is something the Flames D is lacking right now. Weegar is the most physical defenseman we have besides Gilbert but he's more of a spare part / depth player whose best attribute is he can fight.

IOW Yak is exactly the type of defenseman the Flames need. The fact that he's a right shot makes him even more valuable.
May 14 at 12:18 a.m.
#17
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2023
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 586
Edited May 14 at 12:23 a.m.
Quoting: MoxNix
Yakemchuk is 18 years old, 3 years younger than Coronato and 10 years younger than Mangiapane neither of which weighed near 180 lbs when they were drafted. Yakemchuk has plenty of time to fill out just like those two did. The difference is when he's in his 20's he'll almost certainly be well over 200 lbs.


Actually mangiapane has lost 1 pound since he's been drafted and coronato has put on 1. Mangiapane showed a lot of grit but it has kind of disappeared the last few seasons, and coronato was showing a lot towards the end of the season. I agree we don't want a team like the Sabres, but mixing a few smaller skilled guys in wont hurt. I agree as I've noted the average size of the players Conroy has brought in is just under 6'2, but he also added a few smaller skilled guys.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll