DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Utah
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Utah
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Arizona Coyotes Final Roster
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Blazingbat11
Molson beer is meh
Member Since
Jan. 1, 2017
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
3960
Posts per Day
1.5
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
46 minutes ago
Thread:
Lets do crazy blockbusters for fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WastingTimeWithTradeNobodyLikes</b></div><div>he's gotten softer since then, he already started whining and having a bad attitude with the media. He likes to party more now.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Voice_Of_Thruth</b></div><div>Caufield had 29 more points than mercer</div></div>
A lot of people forget as well that Caufield (and Suzuki) already has a Stanley cup finals appearance under his belt. And this nonsense that small players don't show up in the playoffs is bs, Caufield's playoff performance being one example, and you know... Marchessault winning the Conn Smyth last year...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 hour ago
Thread:
Lets do crazy blockbusters for fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div>See I thought you were using that trade to bring the Slovaks together lol</div></div>
I guess there would be a lot of reuniting with the trade lmao, because it would also reunite Caufield with J.Hughes...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 hour ago
Thread:
Lets do crazy blockbusters for fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WastingTimeWithTradeNobodyLikes</b></div><div>everyone talk about caufield like he is a proven 40+ goal scorer but never did 30 goals. He is small, soft and doesnt like to go in the traffic. <strong>he's not the kind of guy that will take his game to the next level in the playoff</strong>, he would get mauled against a team like the panthers or dallas.</div></div>
you've got to be trolling... Caufield has proven he can step up in the playoffs... he practically made Vegas his *female dogs* as a 20 year old rookie and had 12pts in 20 playoff games...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 hours ago
Thread:
Lets do crazy blockbusters for fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>WastingTimeWithTradeNobodyLikes</b></div><div>No reasons for devils to do that. <strong>Mercer is better than Caufield</strong></div></div>
LOL wut?! you're gonna have to explain that one...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
2 hours ago
Thread:
Lets do crazy blockbusters for fun
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Subbanator7667</b></div><div><strong>You have your 2nd and 3rd lines backwards</strong>
NJ trade would be a fun idea
Pass on the LA trade, I like Danault but he made his choice to leave and can live with it</div></div>
They are interchangeable for sure. Need offense, Dach line, need to shutdown the opponent, Danault line. Let's not discount the chemistry between Danault and Gallagher, they literally were one of the best 5v5 lines for years...
The other cool tidbit is reuniting both Newfies in Mercer and Newhook lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Change of scenery
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wz92</b></div><div>The only reasons mik wasn't scratched is because he's good defensively</div></div>
So that would be the "appeal" for MTL to take on Mikheyev. They'd be looking for a more responsible defensive player to play in their bottom 6, VAN want to take a gamble on a more physical forward.
But if I'm being fair... Anderson was almost unplayable by the end of the season for the last 15 games or so... He practically gave up on his season, wasn't even hitting anymore. It really wouldn't surprise me if MTL waives him to send him down to the AHL after training camp if he doesn't smarten up and some of the kids bump him out of a spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Change of scenery
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dickie_Dunn</b></div><div>Anderson contract has a total value remaining of $16.5M over 3 years. Miky has two years left at a total value of $9.5M. The delta between the two is $7M?</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wz92</b></div><div>I messed up! Thought they were both 2 years left. You're right</div></div>
True, but from MTLs perspective, there's really no issue or rush to move Anderson. Habs aren't in any cap troubles, they could easily bury Anderson in the AHL if needed. If VAN want to take a gamble on Anderson that's fine, but there's zero incentive for Hughes to have to pay to move him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Change of scenery
As a Habs fan, yes without the retention. I'd throw in a 3rd or 4th rd pick to make up the difference instead.
MTL needs to start opening their retention slots to get more flexibility to make other moves. So if VAN want MTL to retain, let's say $750k per year for 3 years, that roughly $2.25mil total which should be worth around a 3rd or 4th rd pick instead.
So counter offer:
VAN gets: Anderson + 3rd
MTL gets: Mikheyev
Anderson is probably the more talented, physical player. but it's almost a wash imo (Mikheyev probably more defensively responsible (maybe?)) But if Mikheyev and Anderson both can't turn things around, Mikheyev is easier to bury, and his contract ends sooner.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 12:51 p.m.
Thread:
A Necas Matheson deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Morrow will take Skjei's spot on the powerplay. Burns and Morrow can run the man advantage. They don't need another D man to run the man advantage</div></div>
As I wrote in the description. The Canes could definitely go internal. But with CAR wanting to contend for a cup, it might be a bit soon to think Morrow can take over the PP.
Is a trade like going to happen? probably not (as for most trades on here lol). But I don't think this is a "This will NEVER happen!" kind of deal. There is a realistic way of thinking that CAR could have interest in Matheson.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 12:45 p.m.
Thread:
A Necas Matheson deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>my_name_is_Fil</b></div><div>the difference is the contract math has, and the one necas dosnt</div></div>
Well if you're referring to Necas being a free agent, he's an RFA. Habs will hold his rights to negotiate a new deal. not really an issue. If you're referring to the cap hit, yes Matheson has a great value. But Necas being a 25 year old 1st line RW... much more valuable.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 12:20 p.m.
Thread:
A Necas Matheson deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>my_name_is_Fil</b></div><div>math is very very offensive so yeah i can see something like this. but i cant see mtl clogging the spots with ageing forwards. fast can be kept out.
more like a 1 for 1 swap</div></div>
No way CAR does 1 for 1. Younger assets NEED to be included to make up the 5 year difference between Necas and Matheson. Or else CAR wouldn't bother. I think Kapanen would be the prospect CAR would target. I'd prefer to keep him, so if they want to swap him with Barron I'm all for it. But you gotta give to get.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 12:13 p.m.
Thread:
A Necas Matheson deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Carolina have their Skjei replacement in Orlov, that's why he was signed. They don't need another LD, they'd be looking at RD, and not as the centerpiece of the return.</div></div>
Yes and no, Orlov and Slavin barely ever play on the PP, Skjei did. So, if CAR are looking for a PP LD (Obviously Burns is running PP1, but he'll be in his last year of his contract and turning 40), Matheson is probably the best PP option on the market (aside from Montour) at a cheap cap hit until 2026-27.
But Barron would be a good trade target (not necessarily in a Necas deal) for a young RD.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 5:08 p.m.
Thread:
Big move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>I know less about Barron’s situation, but I don’t think he would be on our list, unless we made moves elsewhere. Guhle very much sounds like the type of dman Fitzgerald as talked about.
And I would guess that Holtz or #10 pick would be on table.</div></div>
Oh there I agree with you! And for me, 10th overall 1 for 1 for Guhle is a fair trade imo. I still think MTL turns it down simply because they are looking at speeding up their rebuild, trading Guhle for a future asset does the opposite. But in terms of value it's fair.
Holtz however is not worth anywhere near a top 10 pick.
And thanks to your friend <a href="/users/dgibb10" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@dgibb10</a>, he provided me a great competition tool that evaluates player matchups (Thanks again for the link!). And Holtz is the most sheltered player on NJD roster, and struggles defensively across the board. There's no way New Jersey gets their value back from where they selected him at 7th overall 4 years ago. There's no doubt he still has offensive potential, but he's much closer to being like Kaliyev in terms of value, those two are very comparable (Holtz being 1 year younger, Kaliyev with better pts per games stats).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 4:49 p.m.
Thread:
Levshunov or Demidov
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>squashmaple</b></div><div>As a Jackets fan, I want Chicago to pick Levshunov because that means Demidov probably falls to 4OA. As a Ducks fan, I want Chicago to pick Demidov so the Ducks get Levshunov (once Demidov is gone, I am not terribly pressed about who Columbus ends with). I just hope all of us get the best fit for our teams in the end. Except Montreal—I hope they end up having to settle for a defenseman because reading their fan reactions is always funny.</div></div>
As a Habs fan, if for whatever reason Habs end up selecting Levshunov (highly unlikely) or Silayev, I'd 100% be ok with that.
I still think they take Lindstrom or Demidov (if still there) and have Iginla as their backup option. All good choices imo
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 4:05 p.m.
Thread:
Big move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Kent Hughes can not give his best prospects NHL opportunities for the sake of a bunch of bottom pairing dman if he wants.
In NJD, barron would be waived.
Siegs-Hamilton
Hughes-Nemec
3LD-Marino
Bahl
And then Barron to waivers</div></div>
My bad, misunderstood your last comment.
My point wasn't about Barron fitting in NJD or a literal trade suggestion, more just a comparison in situation between Holtz and Barron (Both offensively minded, not overly physical, not being given a decent chance, Fans of their respective teams including them in a lot of their trades, etc.)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 3:57 p.m.
Thread:
Big move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Barron has some value somewhere. Not in NJD.
NJD would still need to pick up an LD, and after that happens <strong>Barron would be placed on waivers</strong>.</div></div>
Not going to happen. If he's not moved this offseason, Kovacevic is likely gone and Barron will stick with the Habs.
If Hughes has proven anything since he's been GM, is he doesn't throw away assets. He ran with 3 goaltenders almost all year because he refused to waive Primeau. Barron is easily worth way more than Primeau, do you really think Hughes would waive him?! I don't think so.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Most Devils fans don’t want to trade Holtz. But since he has been in rumor mill, we are just reacting to what is being discussed.
Holtz played 4th line last year. For some reason, Lindy never liked him and never gave him a chance. In the few moments when he played top-6, he looked good, and we thought it was signs of things to come. But no, he would go right back to 4th line.
We have a new coach this year, so maybe it all changes. But anyone who has watched him play…or looked through his numbers would see a very promising player.</div></div>
Same could be said for Barron. He played primarily on the 3rd pair, but when he was paired with Matheson, he looked great. He also posted 7 goals in 48 games (very promising for a Dman). But due to the sheer quantity of Habs dmen, he never got a decent chance, and due to his waiver exemption, was sent down. If Harris or Kovacevic were waiver exempt, 100% Barron would have stuck around. But anyone who has watched him play…or looked through his numbers would see a very promising player.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 2:44 p.m.
Thread:
Big move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Montreal fanbase circa 2022
NJD fans saw daily trades from Montreal fans (Bratt + 2nd overall, Nemec + 2023 1st, etc).
MTL fans were 100% convinced that was Josh Anderson's value.
No, of course it never happened.
Fitzgerald never spoke to Hughes about Anderson, as multiple had to later report.</div></div>
And those are crazy propositions... I was one of the Anderson defenders back in the day, but I never thought Anderson was worth anything close to that.
but to loop things back to this conversation, what does some Habs crazies Anderson proposals from 2022 have to do with this? My initial comment is poking at the fact that NJD fans love explaining how good Holtz is compared to other players but proceed to include him in every single one of their trades.
Seems to me like he is NJD fans version of Justin Barron for Habs fans. Someone they value, but view as expendable, so they trade him in A LOT of mock trades.
So how's this for a trade: Holtz for Barron lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 1:54 p.m.
Thread:
Big move
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Habs fans: <strong>Kent Hughes declined Nemec + 1st for Josh Anderson </strong>
Habs fans: Kent Hughes should keep his job</div></div>
show receipts... because that never happened
EDIT: and if that's what Fitzgerald offered for Anderson...he should be equally fired lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 1:45 p.m.
Thread:
Big move
NJD fans: Holtz is great! Better than *insert player name*, etc. etc.
Also NJD fans: *includes Holtz in pretty much all their mock trades...*
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 6:25 p.m.
Thread:
Alternative to Demidov or Lindstrom
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Again, something to keep in mind is Arber Xhekaj gets among the easiest matchups in hockey.
Pros and Cons:
Pros:
-Enforcer
-Decent shot
-Mediocre offensively (compared to other 3rd pairing guys)
Cons:
-Has to be incredibly sheltered making the lives of your other dman much harder
-Will constantly put your team on the PK
-Has no value on either special teams unit (most guys contribute on at least 1)
-Not good defensively
The lack of ability to contribute on either special teams units, and the fact that he makes your other dmen's jobs much harder by both forcing them into tougher minutes and making them kill penalties more, means you are almost certainly better off just playing a waivers caliber player, such as a Hanley, Kovacevic, DeSimone, etc. Or giving time to a youngster with actual upside like Barron or Struble.</div></div>
"decent shot"... come on now... you're just downplaying his pros and over-exaggerating his cons to try and hold firm of your opinion of him (which is weird). Evolving-Hockey literally has him valued as a $3.1mil aav dman (I personally think thats too high). Kind of hard to hold firm that he's "an AHL caliber player"...
and, genuinely curious, where are you getting that he's playing sheltered minutes and getting "among the easiest matchups in hockey"? I'm looking everywhere (scouring the internet!) and legitimately can't find anything.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 6:04 p.m.
Thread:
off the wall
Without the context of how he was acquired... it would probably be cost Mittelstadt lol.
But again, stating the obvious, Guhle isn't for sale.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 5:54 p.m.
Thread:
Alternative to Demidov or Lindstrom
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Arber Xhekaj playing well in the AHL proves he's an NHLer caliber dman how?
Arber Xhekaj is not an NHL caliber dman.
He can't defend well, and he can't defend at all without commiting penalties (no player takes penalties not even including fighting majors at a higher rate)
He plays among the easiest, most sheltered minutes in hockey for 15 minutes a night.</div></div>
<img class="for_img" src="https://i.postimg.cc/XvbyBzdc/Xhekaj.jpg" alt="Xhekaj.jpg">
Penalties (excluding fighting majors) are absolutely something he needs to work on, granted. Defensively he's still an NHL caliber 3rd pairing dman, it's a fair assessment. offensively at 5v5 he's been fantastic. Calling him an AHL caliber player is literally objectively false...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 5:23 p.m.
Thread:
Alternative to Demidov or Lindstrom
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Xhekaj is an excellent enforcer. Unfortunately he’s an AHL caliber hockey player.</div></div>
excellent enforcer? Correct! An AHL caliber player? Wrong!
During his rookie season, I probably would've agreed with you, he was just a good story at that point, and really did have sub-par NHL metrics. But this past season, he took major strides and I think it's more than fair that Xhekaj perfectly fits where he is as a 3rd pairing Dman right now, even on a contending team (which is why he's supposedly generating a ton of interest from other teams).
The AHL level stuff was debunked when Xhekaj actually...you know... played for Laval for 17 games.... he dominated, full stop. He was a man in a boy's league (or whatever that saying is lol).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 5:00 p.m.
Thread:
The case for trading Guhle
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>I wouldn't move Guhle just because Habs have depth on LHD. Guhle could be arguably the best of all of them. Until we know what we have, there is no point moving him IMO. Not to mention that <strong>Guhle is not worth a top 10 pick in the draft</strong>, especially this year, at least not yet. So we'd likely have to move him for another young roster player from another team whose a forward if anything.
Guhle can also play RHD pretty decently so putting him on the right side, at least for 1 year, makes others who are more reasonable, expendable. Harris IMO has no future on this team if Hutson makes the club.
Savard and Kovacevic are likely gone by TDL, freeing up more spots. Barron needs to step up or he may be waiver claimed. Xhekaj can play the right side if need be. Struble is not waiver eligible so he can be sent down. Mailloux also. etc etc
There isn't as much of a rush to move a dmen as many think. Depth is a good thing, especially with how many injuries the team has every year. Also, It'll be nice for Laval to not have to rely on ECHL players for once.</div></div>
I know you said, "at least not yet", but even now there would be teams in the top 10 that would jump at the opportunity to acquire Guhle. It depends on teams situation for sure. NJD almost 100%, OTT, UTA and SEA would most certainly be interested (even if MTL would have to add maybe a secondary asset but Guhle would still be the key piece),
But let's play the hypothetical game. let's say CGY did indeed offer the 9th pick for Guhle, would Hughes accept the deal? We can all debate how close or not in terms of value in a vacuum and whatnot, but realistically, MTL is probably the team turning down the deal.
Gorton and Hughes have made it very clear they want to speed up the rebuild. Moving Guhle for a future asset (of equal or close to similar value) does the exact opposite. And Guhle hasn't reached his full potential yet, everyone agrees with this. He's already showing strong metrics as a top pairing D (playing on his off side no less). And we haven't touched on a key component of Guhle's game either; going back to his draft selection, the whole point and Bergevin's sales pitch for selecting him was... the "InTaNgIbLes"... He's a leader, he's a playoff type performer, he plays "the right way", etc. etc. There hasn't really been a true opportunity for Guhle to showcase those skills with MTL being a bottom feeding team.
It is kind of telling now with Guhle finally playing in a competitive environment, that he's thriving and has been one of team Canada's best defenders in a squad that includes Powers, Byram, Parayko, Severson, and Oleksiak...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 9:43 p.m.
Thread:
Canes 4 the cup
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Campabee</b></div><div>Not what I said, I said without a more talented 2nd line we aren't making the playoffs. Newhook put up a whopping 34 points in 55 games, that is 3rd line production (50 points prorated)</div></div>
I agree that once MTL is contending, Newhook ideally is on your 3rd line (at wing or C). But MTL isn’t contending next year. So it’s not the end of the world for him to start on the 2nd line. Same could be said with him on PP1. Ideally he probably leads the 2nd unit on a contender.
And being fair to Newhook, injury aside, he got better as the season went on and got more comfortable. It’s not out of the question that he’ll produce at a better rate next season. He easily has 60pts potential.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com