SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Lancebmx

Member Since
Oct. 1, 2020
Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
2nd Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
10735
Posts per Day
8.1
Forum: Armchair-GM10 hours ago
Thread: UP AND DOWN
The Chicago trade I could see happening. I wouldn't do it personally and in this scenario it's not good as you have the cap space to cover the buyout once you take out the drafted players that wouldn't be in the team.
The Sharks trade is bad for us. Maatta isn't a negative asset, he should get a more round pick in return. Trading two seconds is alot more than that pick should be worth. Especially next year's second as that player could be better than the one selected at 33OA. It's supposed to be a deeper draft.
For your picks, I have no issue selecting Terik, I don't mind him at all. The other guy I would be cautious about. Very unproven player against any real competition. He's a man playing against boys with his size. I could see taking a flyer on him with a third but two seconds and Maatta is quite the reach.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 10:35 p.m.
Thread: Getting bigger and harder to play against
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MT9</b></div><div>I’m saying regarding Krugs contract it will be easier to move with 3 years left instead of 4 like the guy originally said. After next season it then moves to a Modified clause. Armstrong already had a deal with Philly last offseason with Philly for Sanheim. Not like he will be unmovable forever imo.

I was not meaning Krug is easier to trade than Chiarot or anything like that</div></div>

I understand.

But yeah, been down this Krug hole alot. Doesn't make sense for us with where we are, unless like I said significant compensation which the Blues aren't or at least shouldn't be willing to do.

I think the Blues are going to have a couple transition years. Ride out the few years left of Krug, Leddy, Saad (not saying he's bad). Stockpile some decent picks and prospects. Trade Buch for a decent haul. Then inject the youth and this team should be good again in a few years.
I think the next few years are going to be similar to this year. Fringe playoff team but not bad enough to get a top pick.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:38 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:20 p.m.
Thread: Devils Fans What is the ask from Detroit for 10
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Not expecting Edvinsson to be going anywhere….but couldn’t think of anyone else fitting our needs, timeline and able to return that pick. I don’t think Walman gets it done. Wings aren’t moving any core young forwards. ASP maybe fits value wise…but neither the skillset nor the position are needs for NJD. Who am I forgetting?</div></div>

Wallinder and Buium but they don't fit the timeline of ready now. Walman could be had I think. I don't believe he's a long term solution. We would need to find a replacement and that likely means overpaying in free agency. Walman and a second would be the offer but I don't think it's the best one. There is potential for a deal to be had I think. I don't hate Ras and #47. We would really need to push for someone like Joshua, Trenin or Carrier to replace him but it's doable. Chiarot would fit the mold of physical top 4 D but his contract might not be ideal and likely still need something added to it. Chiarot with some retention plus #47.