SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Lancebmx

Member Since
Oct. 1, 2020
Favourite Team
Detroit Red Wings
2nd Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
11093
Posts per Day
8.2
Forum: Armchair-GM15 hours ago
Thread: Gotta Make Moves To Fix Yzermans Mess
On your team though, McIsaac doesn't get a contract. He's playing in Europe or something. I doubt he gets tendered a qualifying offer.
Berggren doesn't really deserve that much money, I think he gets a bit extra but that's quite a bit. Could work out really well if he plays well. The risk might be worth it.
Johansson doesn't get that much, can likely get him on a two year deal for under a million.
Lindholm isn't signing a one year deal, not at his age.
Duchene likely gets that offer at least in Dallas and stays there.
You were complaining about the big contracts to not great players then sign 30 year old Skjei to a big 6 year deal and 32 year old be Hakanpaa to a 3 year deal. Nothing against those players but those deals won't agree well at all.
Giving up a first, even if there is questionable cap attached, for a 34 year old goalie is also not great.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 hours ago
Thread: Gotta Make Moves To Fix Yzermans Mess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IDKtbh</b></div><div>I think you’re a very knowledgeable and logical Red Wings / hockey fan. With that being said, you seem like a very optimistic person and your view on this topic isn’t wrong; it’s just very optimistic.

Copp is a LW. Sure, he can play Center, but he’s a LW. He’s also a 3rd line talent. I always looked at that signing as an eventual replacement for Bertuzzi and fully expected Yzerman to acquire a real top 6 Center and that hasn’t happened yet.

Compher is a good player, like Copp, but he’s also a 3rd liner. He is a real Center, though, so that’s cool.

Both these guys were signed too long and for too much money. I know you’re saying there wasn’t many options but, that’s an excuse. We could have traded for Monahan like we mentioned previously or we could have signed any veteran NHLer to do very similar to what both those players have done for less money and much shorter term and revisited the need in the following offseason until a great fit came along.

Husso deal I hated from the start. Trading for a pending UFA’s rights unless it’s a superstar is just asinine to me. Again, another one of those “smartest man in the room” deals. He did play well his first year, which, I never thought he was a bad player and still do not, but again, why trade assets, and spend $15m on a player who isn’t going to be much better than a veteran goaltender that we could just sign to a 1 year deal for much less, or hell, the same AAV but for 1 year instead of 3 or 4.</div></div>

Husso was the best available option, even looking back only really Lindgren is a better option but wasn't at the time. I thought it was a bit too give up but he got his guy I guess.

I'm very logical and optimistic person. I understand the frustration though.

Monahan was injured, he was super risky. Even his first year in Montreal was injury riddled. Still wish we did the deal with Calgary though.

I agree both Compher and Copp would be better served on the third line but we don't have the luxury of that option. Hopefully when Danielson and Kasper come up they move down eventually. Also to get players in their prime years for only 5 years isn't bad. I'm going they will be great complimentary pieces in the future, just tough for them blue cause they have alot of responsibility now.

One thing Yzerman hasn't done is trade a bunch of assets for players. That's allowed us to build a decent prospect pool that should get better after this draft. As frustrating as that may be, it's a better direction since those players he could have traded for would likely be expensive burdens by the time this team competes.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 hours ago
Thread: Gotta Make Moves To Fix Yzermans Mess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Swedish_Mafia</b></div><div>Fully agree. Every one of those signing was blatantly bad before the ink was dry. My take is that he got sick of losing and pulled the plug early on the rebuild when the team was half baked. They needed another year at the bottom before they started adding veterans.

I think the reality of the situation is he probably got a little lucky in Tampa on a couple guys (Vasi, Point), and Hedman/Stammer were already there. I think most NHL GMs are pretty bad at their job, and he is probably just slightly less bad than the norm.

It’s a boys club with 32 guys who are more concerned with job preservation than actually doing what’s best for the team. The fact that no one ever offer sheets anyone is the silliest thing in the world to me.</div></div>

I wouldn't agree with any of this, other than maybe the boys club. It wasn't about putting the plug to try and win. It was able icing a team of NHL players and trying to build a winning culture. Pre-McDavid Oilers Ave the Sabres are perfect examples. Those teams just expected to lose every game. Edmonton specifically, those boys you could see in the bar after every game. Had a buddy with Minnesota at the time, they never did that. The culture was different. Look at Buffalo, how many times have they been on the bottom, still are. They didn't build a winning culture and it shows, everyone just expects them to be bad. I would say majority of the players signed as free agents are there not only to help the team be better but also shelter our young guys when they come up.
At the end of the day you have to make money and losing doesn't make money. Don't forget about the business side of things, the fact we had the COVID seasons and just built a new arena.
Forum: Armchair-GM16 hours ago
Thread: Gotta Make Moves To Fix Yzermans Mess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IDKtbh</b></div><div>I agree with everything you said. I suppose that explanation could absolutely be a possibility, we will never know.

It still bothers me though, and people always look at me like I’m crazy when I say this but, even the Seider pick irks me to this day. I remember watching the draft and I actually wanted Seider; just NOT at #6. My brother said to me at the time, “what if he turns into a Nicklas Lidstrom type player” and I said I still don’t like the pick, love the player, don’t like the spot.

I did a mock draft prior to that draft and I had us taking Trevor Zegras, my sights were set on the two American boys, Zegras &amp; Boldy, obviously you can only get one. And I actually had us trading back into the 1st round to #24 to take Seider. Now, maybe Seider wasn’t going to be on the board that late, but I still believe he would have been there somewhere in the teens, but we’ll never know.

I definitely wouldn’t have taken a defenseman who I thought was not necessarily dynamic offensively that high in the draft which was another element of the player that bothered me. We had the draft capital at the time to move up in the draft and something like what I suggested could have worked.

At the end of the day I’m fine with the player, he’s been nothing short of terrific, but you can’t help but think IF Yzerman did maneuver in that draft and got us Zegras or Boldy and made a shrewd move to swing back into the first round and get Seider too? That would have been something.</div></div>

Seider wasn't going to be their past 10. I heard another team was high on him and was likely taken top 10. Who knows how true that is though.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 hours ago
Thread: Gotta Make Moves To Fix Yzermans Mess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IDKtbh</b></div><div>No one is signed long term? He’s signed 4 mediocre players to deals between 3-5 years. Holl, Chiarot, Copp &amp; Compher. A combined nearly $20m “placeholders” for another 2-4 seasons.

U don’t have to sugarcoat it for anybody, this is what it is.</div></div>

That's not really long term, mid term. Berggren should have been in the NHL yes, but that's really it out of the players this year. Edvinsson had surgery and was best suited to start in the AHL. Also going to need guys to help teach the young players when they come up. I have no issues with Chiarot, Copp, Husso or Compher.
Husso was coming off of some good seasons, he made a move to try and make our goaltending better, it didn't work out. It was the same with Ned but they screwed Ned around.
Chiarot was literally the best defenseman available in that free agency year. We needed a defenseman and we needed toughness, he addressed both. Would it have been nice to have a shorter term deal, sure, but he had to beat out the other teams as well. I've also never been a fan of him but I understand why he signed him.
Copp is exactly what they need him to be, he isn't any less than he was in Winnipeg. His time with the Rangers was a one off for sure. Maybe a slight overpay but we needed a centre and got a centre. I would actually argue he's been producing better since he gets about 15% less o-zone starts compared to his time with the Jets. He's a good leader and our best defensive centre. He will be a good mentor for Kasper.
Compher was decent enough at 2C. It's he the best option option available, no but he was one of the best options available in free agency last year. He was literally the second best centre available after ROR, but 4 years younger. Again we needed a centre and went and got one.
With Berggren being stuck in the AHL, that was just unfortunate circumstance for him. 22/23 season we got decimated with injuries and iced basically an AHL team. Last offseason he went and signed players so we actually had some depth, we didn't get decimated with injuries this year so he was the unfortunate one being waiver exempt to go to the minors. Then add Kane into the mix.....
Holl was a rough one, we needed RHD and he overpaid to get it. It didn't work out. The rest of the free agent signings have been exactly as advertised. Perron was good for us. Lyon was really good for us. Reimer was decent enough. Gost was great for the powerplay. Sprong did offense.
He was able to trade for Debrincat for cheap, great move there.
All of the players signed though, placeholders. They are all players that will help compliment our young guys when they come up. You can't just throw young guys on the team and tell them to figure it out. You need good veterans to shelter them. Look at Buffalo as an example of that.
All in all I would say he's done a pretty good job trading this team from being one of the worst a couple years ago to almost a playoff team with one of the better prospect pools in the league. Definitely made mistakes but show me a GM that hasn't.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 hours ago
Thread: Gotta Make Moves To Fix Yzermans Mess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>IDKtbh</b></div><div>I certainly expected Yzerman to make a ton of trades when he took over and I’m still perplexed and disappointed in the missed opportunity on the Patrick Marleau deal in 2019 that ultimately netted Carolina Seth Jarvis.

I thought it was a foregone conclusion that Yzerman &amp; Shanahan would link up in that deal and I’m still not over it. We’ve taken on one single cap dump in 6 years (Marc Staal) and he’s continued to dish out long term deal after another to mediocre players.

What bothered me almost as much as missing out on the Marleau deal was when Sean Monahan was being dangled as a cap dump who also netted MTL a first round pick for taking on just 1 year left on his deal (almost identical to the TOR/CAR deal) and instead of adding a serviceable player who played a position of need (C) and getting compensated to do so, he opted to dish out a 5 year deal to Andrew Copp. And then did it again the following season with JT Compher. Inexcusable.

To add insult to injury, Monahan was re-signed by MTL for cheap and then flipped at the deadline this past season for another 1st round pick.

Those are the kinds of moves I expected Yzerman to make, they’re moves I think about and would expect out of myself as a GM and it’s frustrating that he simply has not exhibited any form of shrewdness as GM thus far.</div></div>

I agree on the cap dump stuff. But maybe they he wasn't allowed to spend too the cap at the time? The team has declining ticket sales and just built a new arena. Maybe they were penny pinching. Have to remember there is a business side of things, not making excuses just making a statement.
I'm also also saddened about the Marleau and Monahan deals. Monahan especially cause we needed a centre. Another one I was hoping for was the Gostisbehere deal, we needed a left handed defenseman and more offense, went to Arizona. Maybe behind the scenes the deals weren't presented to him? Maybe he ask was just a bit high? Could be a bunch of contributing factors to it.
I like at players like Wyatt Johnston and Brock Faber and see how we missed drafting them. I've never looked the idea of trading down and it pisses me off when he does.
Forum: Armchair-GM17 hours ago
Thread: Gotta Make Moves To Fix Yzermans Mess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SharkTank</b></div><div>I'm not sure what's going on in Detroit?

Is Yzerman just waiting for his prospects to develop and become NHL players?

Is he signing more UFA's as place holders?

I was expecting more impactful trades when Steve came back in 2019.

He's made a few.

Hit on Seider.

Hit on Raymond despite being screwed by Bettman.

I'm not going to say he's done a bad job as Red Wings GM.

He did have to clean up an absolute mess by Kenny Holland.

I'm just not sure where he goes from here?</div></div>

Yzerman wants to build a team through the draft. He's missed on some picks for sure but most of his first rounders have looked good. UFAs are place holders, it's pretty easy to see, in I don't understand how people don't. No one is signed for long term.
It sucks missing out on guys like Faber and Johnston and stuff, players that were drafted with picks we owned, but you never know.
Takes time to draft and develop players.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:44 a.m.
Thread: Detroit Red Wings
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pavelisgoat</b></div><div>NYR trade - I'd like to scrap the Lindgren and Walman swap, drop 500k retention from Trouba and make it a 3rd
I do really appreciate what you've done to the defensive part of our defence, Roy, Ed and Trouba make us substantially better, Lindgren probably helps as well but Walman can play his part if we add all those other guys.
I am against resigning Kane, but can admit if we improve our defence THIS much then he'd be good to have back.
CBJ trade - can't see them doing that and would like different options in net but would take it if they take the deal
Do you think Veleno gets dealt if Kasper looks ready?</div></div>

Lindgren is younger and better than Walman. I know we have alot of depth coming up in that position but he can also slide down the line up. I could easily see that not being a part of the trade.
Veleno can play the wing and we likely won't know about Kasper until the start of the season. Personally I would leave him down there to start the season. I want to see him earn the 1C spot before he makes the jump. I'm also not opposed to him starting in Detroit. He just turned 20 this year so there is no rush. Ideally he shows a bit more offensive upside before being stuffed into a defensive third or fourth line roll.