SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

sharksdoee

sharks88
Member Since
Jul. 3, 2019
Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
Forum Posts
399
Posts per Day
0.2
Forum: Armchair-GMWed. at 1:34 p.m.
Thread: RW upgrade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mvp13</b></div><div>I don't disagree with the notion that you need an NHL team to foster development, but where the nuts have you been the last few years? It makes no sense to me that you are fine with selling off everything, but the buck stops at 1 year signed 32 year old Granlund? Just doesn't make any sense. Grier obviously doesn't agree or else he wouldn't have dumped and retained on Hertl for six years. That is center ice leadership that makes sense to keep because he's under contract and wanted to stay (at one point, anyway), not a temporary flier like Granlund</div></div>

With Hertl he was on a long and expensive contract (as was EK, BB, etc.) and they wouldn't be great players by the time SJ's ready to compete again, so they needed to be moved. Granlund has helped FZ and Eklund's development enough where it's worth it to keep him. SJ might look for high picks for him at the TDL or a RD prospect. Value might be there on the face and I'd like to take a chance on Kakko but likely would look for a higher pick (which I know you unfortunately don't have for a while) instead of Bryce + 5th.
Forum: Mock-DraftMay 26 at 8:10 p.m.
Thread: Hayden's Mock 2024
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MyTeamsSuck</b></div><div>Ullmark is one year removed from winning the Vezina, he’s 100% worth that pick. Yall have no concept of worth when it comes to goalies. If you want good goaltending you have to give up something of worth for it, not your scrappy late round picks and B list prospects. If it were that easy TOR or LA would have good goaltending. The only excuse for not paying for Ullmark is “he’s too old” or “he doesn’t fit our timeline for contention” which is bs since you’ll never find a young top goaltender on the market without giving up half your franchise for him.</div></div>

He's also 31 at the start of the season and seemingly falls apart during the playoffs (sure, you can blame some on the team). Don't think a team with a still young core would trade that high a pick for him.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 25 at 2:08 p.m.
Thread: Moves
lmao
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 24 at 5:28 p.m.
Thread: No Couture
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Tblecavalier4</b></div><div>I think our GM (Bolts) doesn't care about being embarrassed and looks as past investment/deals. (Examples, trading McDonagh away basically for free just to drop his cap then 2 years later trading for him but spending a 2nd rounder). Bolts are either willing to give him away or double down on Jeannot coming in healthy and living up to potential.

If Sheary will waive no trade clause for San Jose, please do take him. He signed in Tampa to find stable long term place for his family, so he might be good with that in San Jose, but cost of living and taxes he may not bold well for him. Weather would work. I am sure bolts will have to tell him its Syracuse or waive your NTC if they don't want him back.</div></div>

Not a bad way of business, seems to own up to mistakes and move on. Hopefully something like this allows you to re-sign Stammer. It'd be very weird seeing him in another jersey.