SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

DQavis

DQtalks
Member Since
Jul. 19, 2021
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Vegas Golden Knights
Forum Posts
541
Posts per Day
0.5
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 3:19 p.m.
Thread: Testing a theory
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DQavis</b></div><div>Necas has had one good yr but played with aho svech kk terivainen which is better then what zegras and caufield had expescially with both teams being bottom 3-5 the last 3 seasons. Carolina has been a contender half of necas career.
And if he wants more minutes just out produce jarvis he cant then hes not a top line player he has had 5 years to prove it hasnt done it. Caufield solidified his spot. Zegras got injured having a down year looking like hes bouncing back but ana drafter 2 high draft talents with more potential.</div></div>

Also just wanna say i look at advanced statistics that shows every aspect of a players game to determine almost anything you can think of % wise so imnt just making **** up ask about something and i can tell you by stats and my own opinion on the strenghts of teams and why certian players should thrive more or have more success.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 3:14 p.m.
Thread: Testing a theory
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazorSeider53</b></div><div>I’d take Necas over both. Doesn’t get nearly the opportunities either of those guys do.

Also I’d argue Zegras value is lower (than you’ve suggested) than Caufield’s right now. Not really any fault of his own, he’s just been hurt all year.

Which is also why even if Anaheim wanted to sell him, they won’t while his value is down.</div></div>

Necas has had one good yr but played with aho svech kk terivainen which is better then what zegras and caufield had expescially with both teams being bottom 3-5 the last 3 seasons. Carolina has been a contender half of necas career.
And if he wants more minutes just out produce jarvis he cant then hes not a top line player he has had 5 years to prove it hasnt done it. Caufield solidified his spot. Zegras got injured having a down year looking like hes bouncing back but ana drafter 2 high draft talents with more potential.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 3:06 p.m.
Thread: Testing a theory
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazorSeider53</b></div><div>This isn’t even really a criticism of Caufield. Raymond’s development in the last year has been absurd.

Started the season 12 pounds heavier and a clear step ahead of where he was last season. He’s a rare case I can recall (From players I track regularly at least) where you can literally see his progression over the season.

Wouldn’t trade him 1 for 1 for Caufield ever. Larkin getting injured was Raymond’s coming out party.</div></div>

Raymond has always had a better offensive team mtl has been a bottom 5 since caufield stepped out except first 10 games but then still without mtl losing like 15 times in ot shootout they wouldnt of been the wildcard. Yes raymonds better but ru telling me a with the league average 10+ shooting percentage and caufield has 2 less goals then raymond with a 8.8s% with over 320 shots if next season he hits 300 shots again with a average shooting % or normal for him 11+ hes hitting 30-40 goals by plane math btw raymonds shooting % is 18.6 and has 2 more goals then caufield <div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazorSeider53</b></div><div>I’m gonna be honest dude it’s hard to even understand and address what you’re saying because you typed a paragraph as one big run-on sentence.

Yes, Raymond is better than Caufield at this point. No it would not be different if they changed teams. Raymond has literally been his best in the last 6 weeks that Detroit has absolutely sucked for.</div></div>

Alight let me rephrase, raymond is the better player. Can every agree a 18.6 shooting % is not obtainable? Yes. League average shooting % is around 10. Caufield has shot at 8.8%. That being said if caufield shot at his normal 11+ or even league average 10 the math shows he should have 30-35 goals just by math if he didnt even have a down shooting year.

I also know mtl only has suzuki slaf caufield matheson who are good on this team and you can say newhook who has less then 35 pts.
Now detriot has kane larkin raymond seider raymond debrincat compher sprong gost who all have more then 41 pts which just shows there offense is better they also have 13 players who have more then our 6th place scorer. 😊

Raymond also has worse defensive numbers no playoff stats to show for and has basically 33 games of development on caufield. They have the same pt% through there careers. Also caufield has had injuries (shoulder surgery)

Yes I agree raymonds better but at the same time with this all being said raymond just has more games and better team.
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 2:27 p.m.
Thread: Testing a theory
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RazorSeider53</b></div><div>This isn’t even really a criticism of Caufield. Raymond’s development in the last year has been absurd.

Started the season 12 pounds heavier and a clear step ahead of where he was last season. He’s a rare case I can recall (From players I track regularly at least) where you can literally see his progression over the season.

Wouldn’t trade him 1 for 1 for Caufield ever. Larkin getting injured was Raymond’s coming out party.</div></div>

Raymond has always had a better offensive team mtl has been a bottom 5 since caufield stepped out except first 10 games but then still without mtl losing like 15 times in ot shootout they wouldnt of been the wildcard. Yes raymonds better but ru telling me a with the league average 10+ shooting percentage and caufield has 2 less goals then raymond with a 8.8s% with over 320 shots if next season he hits 300 shots again with a average shooting % or normal for him 11+ hes hitting 30-40 goals by plane math btw raymonds shooting % is 18.6 and has 2 more goals then caufield which isnt obtainable just thought id shoot that out there
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 2:09 p.m.
Thread: Necas Zegras Parehk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Yeah, you Habs homers love to say that without a shred of statistical support.</div></div>

Zegras best year 81gp 23g 42a -24
Caufield 80gp 27g 37g -4

Caufield better sniper better defensively better playoffs

Already did a stats comparison with a hardcore smart canes fan who knows alot about necas and downed him caufield out produces necas in every aspect except assisting even then caufields shot rebuilds and goals created dominated also better playoffs and necas plays on the canes. If u asked every team in the league besides caufield or zegras every says caufield.
Caufield v necas will be more 60-40 caufield thats cuz hes a sniper but is proving to be a complete player on a ****tier team. Necas is also 2 years older
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 14 at 1:47 p.m.
Thread: Necas Zegras Parehk
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Trevor Zegras is not on the market, and I don't believe that the similar-value Martin Necas is, either, but if they were, neither offer is close for them.

It would take your own 2024 first plus an A prospect like Owen Beck or Filip Mesar to persuade their team to part with either.

Barron probably tops out at second-pair RhD and Kapanen and Ylonen are bottom-6 wingers; it's not clear to me that Ylonen is even worth his Qualifying Offer. You're the first person who's ever used the word "speedy" to describe Josh Anderson, and the two B prospects in THAT offer are no more impressive than Kapanen and Ylonen. Castoffs like that don't get you top-6 forwards like Necas and Zegras, both of whom are comparable to Cole Caufield and each of whom had far better starts to their careers than Juraj Slafkovsky.</div></div>

Caufield is better then zegras and necas lmao