DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Dubcity
Member Since
Feb. 16, 2024
Favourite Team
Calgary Flames
Forum Posts
230
Posts per Day
2.8
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 17 at 1:04 p.m.
Thread:
2024 Habs Offseason Dreams
Harris looks terrible, flames don't go anywhere near him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 17 at 1:03 p.m.
Thread:
Huge trade with the Flames
For one 1st round pick? Lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 14 at 2:21 p.m.
Thread:
Absolute chaos 24-25
I would guess Ottawa, Carolina, Rangers, San Jose all say no. Calgary would take a retained Graves in a second for a 4th. No chance Pittsburgh retains for a remaining 5 years
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 14 at 12:24 p.m.
Thread:
2024 -25 III
Calgary doesn't give that up for Parayko. Not a fit with the team at all given there current state.
Former 1st, Former 2nd, Former 3rd, and to additional 2nds?
Gut our prospect pool to still finish bottom 10 next year?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 14 at 12:20 p.m.
Thread:
Better depth and team D next year
Doesn't move the needle for Backlund either, let alone retained.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 14 at 12:18 p.m.
Thread:
Next season
Calgary declines the 3rd for Matta
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 10:37 p.m.
Thread:
What went wrong
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Goaltending is as luck based as anything. Calgary fans should know this considering Markstrom has played at an elite level in 2 years, and actively kept Calgary out of the playoffs in the other 2.</div></div>
So your whole stat argument goes out the window if it's luck based anyways. So chalk it up as every NJD goalie is unlucky? Or Fitz is unlucky? Or maybe he's just poor at his job
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 9:38 p.m.
Thread:
What went wrong
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Yep. Markstrom was elite to start the year. Been mediocre lately. Seems like the incompetent one is the GM who was unable to turn by far the best stretch of markstroms career into any value at all</div></div>
Fitz has had what 12 different goalies?
Your upset when a GM has a good one he won't give him away? Carry on. Believe this thread is what's wrong with New Jersey, funny to spin it into "Markstrom this Markstrom that"
Fitz sucks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 9:02 p.m.
Thread:
What went wrong
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Weegar, Hanifin, Kylington, Andersson, and Tanev is 3 dmen?
And if Markstrom is a 0.878 goalie with that, good thing we went for Kahkonen who’s a nearly 0.900 goalie on by far the worst team in hockey</div></div>
Lol use a made up sample size vs a full season
Whatever fits your motive
Markstrom is .910 Kahkonen is .895
Blackwood has better stats than Kahkonen in more games
Back to my point
Incompetent GM
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 8:31 p.m.
Thread:
What went wrong
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>7/8 games in that sample had Hanifin and 5/8 had Tanev. And don’t forget Andersson and weegar and kylington</div></div>
Don't forget our top Centre was traded in January and Sharangovich has been our "#1" since lol.
Oh okay nevermind 6 defenseman dgibb10 says 3 is good enough!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 8:24 p.m.
Thread:
What went wrong
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>Upset because you're stuck with your 34 year old goalie who's been a 0.878 since the trade rumours started?</div></div>
Oh you mean since we started trading our top players?
Shocker!!!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 8:09 p.m.
Thread:
What went wrong
Incompetent GM
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 8:03 p.m.
Thread:
rough
Calgary isn't pushing 2 picks to next draft sorry. Plus that Vegas pick has conditions that makes it a 2nd so not trading that either
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 7:05 p.m.
Thread:
OffseasonPracticeMTL
No way Calgary take Anderson's caphit for that return
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 13 at 7:01 p.m.
Thread:
Im High on smth
Why does Calgary need salary retained regardless they're not paying a 3rd round pick for a 33 year old nothing defenseman plus adding a young D prospect that's coming along nicely.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Mar. 13 at 2:26 p.m.
Thread:
New DG
Calgary isn't giving up draft capital for that
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 12 at 10:52 p.m.
Thread:
IF Crosby came next offseason
If they wanted him it would have happened already. They're rebuilding not sending a 2nd for Harris.. isn't happening sorry. Statistically stupid not to? If he's sooo good sounds like Montreal would be statistically stupid for trading him.
Almost as stupid as thinking Crosby would go to Montreal
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 12 at 10:36 p.m.
Thread:
Wings
Calgary passes
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 12 at 10:34 p.m.
Thread:
IF Crosby came next offseason
Calgary isn't trading a 2nd for Harris, get over it already
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 10 at 4:07 p.m.
Thread:
Markstrom offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dgibb10</b></div><div>If Jacob Markstrom were to be a UFA this offseason how much money would you offer him?</div></div>
You seem strangely obsessed with Jacob.
Who do you think will be the new GM once Fitz gets punted for obvious reasons?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 9 at 12:31 a.m.
Thread:
The 3rd year of Rebuilding the Original 6 Habs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>habitantlecolon</b></div><div>what do you want for him?</div></div>
If he continues to play center and gets better at face offs we'll just keep him. Him and Huberdeau are becoming quite the pair we wouldn't ruin that chemistry for a late first.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 9 at 12:25 a.m.
Thread:
The 3rd year of Rebuilding the Original 6 Habs
Flames keep Sharangovich if thats the offer
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 8 at 1:03 a.m.
Thread:
Trade Up at Draft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>Calgary would pick #14 if the draft were held today, so I think we can safely plug them into a pick in the 12-16 range (as OP did.) The 1st they have from Vancouver is going to be in the mid-20s; let's say it's #26OA for the sake of argument.
Do you know how many times, in the last 20 drafts since the lockout year, that a team has traded up from the teens into the top 10?
It's happened twice: In 2007, San Jose gave up #13, #44, & #87 to move up to #9. And in 2005, the Sharks traded #12, #49, & #207 to move up to #8.
So which do you think is more likely to happen: the type of trade that has happened a handful of times in the last 8 years, or the type of trade that hasn't happened in nearly 17 years?</div></div>
Well literally on everyone of your examples theres a team on the other end of it trading up... So it's happened more then twice
I simply said move up didn't say to which spot.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 7 at 10:27 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Up at Draft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>2022: Sharks trade out of #11OA and get back #27OA, #34OA, & #45OA
2021: Chicago trades #12OA, #44OA, Adam Boqvist, & a future 1st for #32OA, #173OA, & Seth Jones
2021: Dallas trades #15OA to get back #23OA, #48OA, & #138OA
2019: Philly trades #11OA to get back #14OA & #45OA
2018: Ottawa trades #22OA to get back #26OA & #48OA
2016: NJ trades #11OA to get back #12OA & #80OA
6 times in the last 8 drafts - the only years it didn't happen were last year (stacked top 10), 2020 (COVID ruined scouting), and 2017 (Vegas expansion draft chaos). It happens quite often, and smart GMs will take advantage of another team's desperation to stockpile more assets - both at the deadline and on the draft floor.</div></div>
So Sharks sure that's one example. Chicago that was a "over the rebuild" move for Seth Jones so doesn't really apply. Dallas literally went to the cup finals the year before, not a rebuilding team . So Philly moved back 3 spots and Ottawa moved back 4 spots, NJ moved back 1 spot.
Only one really comparable is SJ and if anything that's an example of why you shouldnt. It's early but this will likely end up looking bad with all the players they chose to pass over.
Ottawa already had a 4th overall so sure trade back your later first why not.
At the end of the day Calgary needs high end talent, which is usually at the front of the draft. I see them more likely as a team to combine there 1sts to trade up rather then down.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 7 at 9:35 p.m.
Thread:
Trade Up at Draft
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>dannibalcorpse</b></div><div>Happens quite often, usually with later lottery picks (#11-16). The first 10 picks have a huge amount of predictive value so they usually don't get moved, but once you get past that, the difference in expected value between picks is smaller and easier to move out of.
In this trade, if I'm the Flames and I don't see a player I'm absolutely in love with at my pick, I would 100% take it. Calgary's pick right now is #11OA, which per DomtheAthletic's draft pick chart, has an expected GSVA value of 5.7. Philly's pick is at #17OA(4.5) right now and the Leafs' is at #24OA(3.5) - meaning the Flames would be bringing in 8.0 future GSVA and netting 2.3 excess by making that move, and getting an extra lottery ticket in the 5th round to boot.
A team in a full rebuild should be all about amassing as many assets as possible, and this trade would do that. Slam dunk for Calgary to make that deal here.</div></div>
I was asking for examples, Rebuilding team trading down in 1st round... And go
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com