DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
14
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
F50marco
Member Since
May 29, 2015
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
Forum Posts
19588
Posts per Day
6.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
Rossi Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNCountryClub</b></div><div>Gauthier is not a good parallel at all. He was not under contract with PHI and outright said he would not sign. Rossi, however, has a contractual obligation with the Minnesota Wild and does not have an ounce of say in the matter. There is an iron clad legal difference between the two situations. That has exponentially more to do with trade price than whether or not a GM "made the player available."
We're just gonna have to agree to disagree here, and we can revisit the value if he does get dealt this summer.</div></div>
The point would be that both GM's were selling from a point of weakness. Gauthier because he was not going to sign with Philly and Rossi with the fact that it seems he's not a Guerin guy and he keep him despite him playing well. The actual exact details are not the same as i said, obviously. Similar only that one sense.
For sure we'll find out if he's gung ho on moving him. Hope he moves past the size thing and keeps him. He's finally turning into the player he was drafted to be.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 3:57 p.m.
Thread:
just one more year
I highly doubt the Habs do that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 3:19 p.m.
Thread:
Rossi Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNCountryClub</b></div><div>Your theory about that tanking his value is incorrect, as has been observed extensively in any equity market such as stocks or housing. That would be true if all GMs were in cooperation against Guerin, but they're not. They're in competition with each other, as well. The price only needs to reach the point where the highest bidder feels like they're getting good value.
But you are correct in that Guerin is essentially telling the market what he does/doesn't value. Not a great strategy by textbook standards, but honestly, in today's NHL these GMs are all pals and really don't gouge each other the way you'd think. For the most part, they try and make fair deals. There's enough precedent around young players getting traded, that it's gonna be pretty formulaic. Team A gets Player X and Team B gets Player Y + Draft Pick Z.</div></div>
Hmm I still disagree with that first sentiment. NHL trading is different than stocks and the housing market but yes I do agree with the old boys club mentality of the GM's. I didn't mean to imply that teams were now going to bend Guerin over backwards as a result. More so that, in a vacuum, a player like Rossi after the season he had would reach a level of perceived value that would force other teams to start a higher starting point for negotiations. Making him available (With realistic expectations and not just "listening"), automatically changes the dynamic of that negotiation.
Again I didn't mean that now Minny would need to accept the first crap offer thrown at them and I agree 100% with the Team A gets Player X and Team B gets Player Y + Draft Pick Z assertion. The real question I was hinting to is what would be the difference between the hypothetical scenario mentioned above vs if Rossi was not being actively shopped. IMHO I think there would be a decent amount of value lost as a result.
A similar but not exact example of this was Philly with Gauthier. What would Philly have got in return if Gauthier never wanted out and they were just listening to teams offers? Different circumstance than with Rossi obviously but a parallel can be made.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:38 p.m.
Thread:
Rossi Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNCountryClub</b></div><div>Guerin values and prioritizes size/grit. That's pretty much what it boils down to.
He believes the team needs to have more of an edge/nastiness to it. Not saying you or anyone else needs to agree, but that's the reasoning. It has nothing to do with his value being less than what's perceived.</div></div>
That's what I assumed was the core reason for it but figured any GM making that somewhat known to other Gm's would be an absolute moron for doing so. In the game of business and negotiations, that is devaluing your own asset. No team would give you remotely what Guerin thinks he's worth then. Why would they? Whats the worst that will happen? Guerin will keep the asset that doesn't fit his team identity indefinitely? Risking devaluing him in the process? Hence why trying to sell him while his stock is at its highest.
This is just a theory based on the idea that he's actively being shopped of course. If Guerin is fine just keeping him until someone pays up, then there really isn't any smoke to this. Just a random rumor based on a team willing to listen and not reject instantaneously like others would normally do.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:24 p.m.
Thread:
Ranking first overall picks since 2000
Ranked by ...byest!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:21 p.m.
Thread:
Marner
Fair. Unfair. It matters not.
Both teams would not deal with each other for such a big asset. Not when there would be other teams with less risky rivalries willing to offer equal to what Ottawa could offer. NOT TO MENTION That Marner would probably not want to waive to go to another hockey hotbed where every move is scrutinized just like before AND also is in such close proximity for ridicule of his prior team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:07 p.m.
Thread:
3 way trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jackaille</b></div><div>not a great playoff, not a great year and with the coming of your youngsters and the aging players it would be the right time to sell Hintz to re-tool to follow Bourque, Stankoven, Johntson, etc.</div></div>
I mean only 2 games in but I guess the prior pedigree goes out the window? No, sorry this makes no sense.
Not that I agree with it but the Rossi for Guhle move at least makes sense.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 12:03 p.m.
Thread:
Pick Swap
I think the value may be "fair". Really comes down to the draft table and a PHI coveting a guy at that 12th pick a lot. Based on my mock draft, that 12-14 are pretty even in quality so might not be a big enough drop off to consider it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:58 a.m.
Thread:
3 way trade
Yeah because Dallas is trying to move one of their best players apparently? :rolleyes
As likely as trading for Draisaitl or McDavid......
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:55 a.m.
Thread:
Rossi Traded
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>Not gonna lie, I do not understand why Minnesota would trade Rossi... what am I missing? I'm super confused.</div></div>
Agreed. Guy has a break out year and NOW they want to trade him?
This type of methodology screams, selling high at first opportunity. Meaning he's not worth what the perception is of him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:52 a.m.
Thread:
Went Wughes Ideas
Every single deal favors MTL a little too much. With the exception of the Struble deal, which I can't fathom the logic for.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:46 a.m.
Thread:
Trading 5th OVR
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MTLaveragefan</b></div><div>Fair enough. If we look at the 2023 draft picks after Reinbacher - a lot of people would also be happy with Benson, Michkov, Ryan Leonard.
After Slaf's and Hutson's pick - I'm starting to trust Bobrov and his picks. <strong>I just hate that we are once again outside the concensus/creme of the crop top 4..</strong>.</div></div>
Agree with that sentiment 100%. This is the price for not going scorched earth type of rebuild unfortunately. Last year for sure was major drop off. This year however Im less worried. I know everyone is creaming their pants for Lindstrom but the truth is anyone from 3-10 is interchangeable. They all have equal potential, just different playing styles and abilities. All I ask from this mgmt is to take the BPA in their mind and not reach for a position just for need. If its a dman, take the dman.
Like I reiterated, the dman available at 5OV this year may make all other dmen in the entire organization available. Including Hutson for example.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:39 a.m.
Thread:
Clearing up cap space need more goals
Not sure I see the logic for the Habs. The biggest need for the Habs is to reduce the number of roster players, not add to it. Distill the quantity into quality. Pageau is an upgrade on Dvorak for sure but is also more expensive, signed longer, and requires a retention slot from the Habs on Dvorak to get it done. All this just to distill Wahlstrom and a 2nd from a 3rd and a 5th? Wahlstrom has waiver potential and holds little value at the moment.
I think there is a deal to be made involving Pageau to the Habs but this to me doesn't do it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:29 a.m.
Thread:
Habs should at least consider trading Guhle
If we're being honest, this logic applies to anyone. Including Hutson or Matheson or Xhekaj, etc etc
I think the right thing to do is to see what you have in all these dmen first and then decide. We're not there yet.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:26 a.m.
Thread:
Trading 5th OVR
Trading the 5OV for anything other than a legit, already top player, would be a bad move.
It literally makes more sense to move Guys like Guhle, Hutson, Xhekaj, etc than trading the 5ov.
I think people need to hear this: The player taken at 5OV this year is likely to be the best player of all players drafted since Hughes and Gorton have been at the helm, with the exception of Slafkovsky. It makes more sense to move any player we've drafted since Slaf than to move the 5OV.
Just because 5OV is not a unanimous pick does not mean it is less valuable, so we should trade it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Yesterday at 11:19 a.m.
Thread:
would make sabers d complete
The value is not remotely close for Buffalo to accept this.
Also LHD who can play their offside < Than RHD who play the right side.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 10:26 a.m.
Thread:
Questions for my fellow Habs fans
"I don't understand a lot of the Habs fans on this site." - Welcome to the club. :tearsofjoy
Free agency: The Habs cannot simply pick and choose who and when. Montreal as of right now may be one of the least desirable spots in the NHL. They'll make competitive offers to everyone that they want in hopes of convincing one of them. It may take years to snag the big free agent fish we'd want. They need to build the team first and then add the UFA IMO. Based on that, they still have one more year of developing players. One of the best players the Habs may have in the future isn't even drafted yet. (5 Ov)
Matheson: Fans are jumping the gun obviously. They see Hutson and assume they can already let Matheson go. They're just a little trigger happy. Matheson isn't going anywhere for the duration of his contract. He's clear and cut the best dman we have. Odds are he won't be resigned though based on the current LHD depth the Habs got. which is fine. Until Hutson is a 22+ min dman scoring 40+ points a year, Matheson ain't going anywhere.
Rebuilds: CF rebuilds and real life rebuilds are not the same. In CF, the goal to many is to continually trade any and all assets for more picks and prospects in an never ending cycle of trying to upgrade all while being as conservative as possible to avoid looking "stupid". The CF way leads to in real life teams like Buffalo, etc. The only rebuilds like that, that truly work, are the ones that landed a generational star or 2 in the span of a couple drafts. The goal is to win the cup, not have the most 1st round draft picks on the team.
Cap culture: I think Habs management are more than willing to give any big UFA like Reinhart the bag but I kind of feel like he isn't the right fit for right now. But obviously wouldn't say no. I think Stamkos would be a more apropos target because they wouldn't have to sign him long term. Essentially using him as a bridge to when they will be ready to add the 80M+ player contract in their prime. He'll be what makes the current players on the team better and that is needed more IMHO. Habs need scoring sure, but they also need a presence in the locker room a la Weber/Price to get these guys into a winning mentality. Look at what guys like Staal, Perry, Weber, Price etc did for the youth in that 2021 run. This year Monahan played a huge role for some of the younger guys and his presence was never replaced. Gallagher is the only one we have left but he is not of that echelon of leadership and gravitas.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 19 at 4:17 p.m.
Thread:
Does Ottawa want to get their draft pick guy
If the Boston pick is like 29-32 than the value is probably right but is it worth it to draft "your guy" that much? Not really. It all comes down to how management value getting their guy vs the next BPA. I think most GMs now understand its a flawed idea to trade up at such a cost on prospects. It was more prevalent in the older days when scouting wasn't as good as it is now.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Apr. 18 at 2:59 p.m.
Thread:
MTL and NYI cap dump idea
Without retention, Anderson is untradeable. For anything. Well, ok for Marc Vlasic 1 v 1 maybe but that's it. Which defeats the purpose of trading him in the first place.
There is only 3 options. Keep Anderson and try to revive his game enough to make a team bite on a trade next year or trade him with like 50% retention now for like a 3rd/4th rounder at best or Buyout.
The only realistic option is the first one.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Apr. 18 at 2:51 p.m.
Thread:
good for both team
This.........this is not even remotely close to reality. Don't think you are intentionally trying to troll here but this is so bad to the point of someone mistaken it as trolling.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 2:40 p.m.
Thread:
Picking 5th
Not even close to getting 06 OV. Like I refrain from saying it because I don't think GM's actually do this but if they did, this would be worthy of a "laughs and hangs up" type of response.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 1:59 p.m.
Thread:
Blues and Montreal fans thoughts
Me personally? Not a chance.
We can dance around it all day but the truth is, the only reason Snuggerud is even being mentioned in a trade is because there isn't 100% chance he will sign his ELC with STL yet. Any GM knows this and won't give into STL moving him at full value. Why would they? The minute he signs his ELC with STL, all that goes away and then you can begin to discuss whether or not he is worth a top 5 pick in the draft. I still don't think so but you can at least have that discussion.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 1:49 p.m.
Thread:
NHL GMs should offer sheet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharcuda22</b></div><div>I dont see how they can afford Lundell unless the plan is to let Reinhardt walk</div></div>
Trades, UFA's, RFA's, etc. there is lots of time between now and the start of next year. Things can change a lot. They could sign him now and have like 4-5 months to figure it out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 1:47 p.m.
Thread:
big changes
Can't imagine the Habs moving Armia to a division rival. He's kind of stuck in a weird place where he's played good enough for teams to notice and want him but the Habs also kind of would rather keep him if the return would end up just being a 3rd or something. Like no one will overpay for him but it would have to be an overpay for the Habs to move him.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SadSensFan14</b></div><div>He's spent time in the AHL while playing for Montreal, so he must not be that good. Way rather find literally anyone else to improve our scoring.</div></div>
Oct-Nov: you are right, he wasn't playing with enthusiasm and was an absolute drag on the team to the point of them sending him down to the AHL as a wake up call. He admitted to consulting with a mental coach to help get his game back to where it needed to be during his AHL stint. While sent down, immediately became the Laval rockets best player. Didn't sulk in the slightest and was a real pro about it. Got called backup and hasn't looked back. He's been engaged and playing some of the best hockey of his career and the stats reflect that.
So context matters. Players can go from cap dumps to valuable assets quite quickly nowadays. As mentioned above, I wouldn't pay the price the Habs would need for them to let him go but he certainly would be an attractive asset for teams who have actually watched him this year. He'd make an excellent 3rd/4th liner on a cup contender. There was a reason the Habs mgmt chose resigning him long term over Lehkonen at the time.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 1:27 p.m.
Thread:
NHL GMs should offer sheet
Lundell has to be willing to accept the OS also. This offer is like pretty much what he'll get from the Panthers when you factor taxes into it. So its an easy no for him. (Logically speaking)
Going to SJ to be a bottom dweller for the foreseeable future making slightly more money but more taxes OR stay on a perennial cup contender and make a little less money now maybe but more in the long term.... Can't even say the weather is better as a main factor either.
That's why if you do OS someone, the money has to be sooooo much more than the player deserves for them to realistically accept. Just like UFA's, you have to overpay.
Want Lundell? Offer minimum 6.5-7M. Panthers couldn't match and Its a significant overpay that would make any player think twice about. Problem is you better be confident Lundell is a top end player because everyone thought KK was going to be amazing in Carolina and we all know how that is turning out.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com