DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
14
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Jded
Member Since
Jun. 20, 2016
Favourite Team
Anaheim Ducks
Forum Posts
2595
Posts per Day
0.9
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 minutes ago
Thread:
Zegras back in rumors
What is in the water in MTL? Why is this still happening? 🤦♂️
ANA has zero, and I mean zero reason to trade Zegras unless they land an NHL ready LHC in the draft, which means the 11.5% chance they hit on Celebrini. Every rumor has been shut down, Zegras isn’t available
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
16 minutes ago
Thread:
What it would cost IF Mtl wants Zegras
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KasperBrigante</b></div><div>Enough with this delusion. The Ducks are not getting a top 5 pick for a complementary player on a winning team. Zegras is fun to watch play hockey, but he's not the type of player you build your team around.
The best place for a guy like Zegras would be Utah. He'd bring people out of their seats, and that's exactly what you want hitting a new market. Imagine Zegras, Cooley and Keller playing open hockey at the beginning of next year. It would be a joy. Of course, it wouldn't work in the playoffs, but the first half of the season would be must-watch hockey in Utah.</div></div>
The delusion is that he’s getting traded. The reason the ask is high is because it makes absolutely zero sense for ANA to move him. The return would have to make it impossible to say no
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
17 minutes ago
Thread:
What it would cost IF Mtl wants Zegras
I don’t get why this is still happening. ANA has zero reason to move Zegras unless they land another LHC in the draft that’s NHL ready. There’s an 11.5% chance of that happening.
Even if it did, pass on this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 minutes ago
Thread:
Offseason
Ducks need a top 4, but really more like top pair RD. Perb isn’t the right guy for ANA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
3 hours ago
Thread:
Zed not Zee
There’s no reason for ANA to trade Zegras unless they land the 11% odds of Celebrini
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 hours ago
Thread:
Marner
This isn’t a Ducks fan post FYI. Anaheim is not interested in a trading Zegras for Marner, let alone the rest of this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 hours ago
Thread:
Dubas
Ducks wouldn’t move Vatrano at the deadline because their ask was super high. There’s no reason this would entice them
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 hours ago
Thread:
Playoffs
Unless ANA lands their 11% chance of Celebrini, there’s no reason they’d trade Zegras
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 hours ago
Thread:
at the draft
Unless ANA lands their 11% chance of Celebrini, there’s no reason they’d trade Zegras
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 hours ago
Thread:
Faber
You’re not getting Faber and Ducks don’t want Kampf
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Are any of these players available
No, doubtful, yes, doubtful, yes, yes
That said PIT has very few assets to go get one of these players aside from maybe the ones with some bigger red flags hanging over them
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
The next step
Ducks counter with Lacombe and a 2nd for Caufield
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Entenheim
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>I get they probably don't want to but if Landeskof comes back and they don't want to risk franchise tagging Mittlestadt, they've got some rough decisions ahead.</div></div>
Yeah like I said I get the ACGM case for it. But in reality it doesn’t seem likely to happen at all. Lande is an unknown, COL has a lot of other players they could move to free cap, and there’s no rumor that ANA is targeting him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 hours ago
Thread:
Entenheim
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>I don't know, I think I've come around to the idea that Lundes not good enough to be a 3C, and not physical enough to be a 4C. Jones and Leason are both fast and will go through a wall if the coach tells them too, and have the size to do so, but I think I'm over Lindstrom on this team.
If we can parlay lundestrom into a Colton or even a Faksa we should.</div></div>
Preaching to the choir on Lunde. I’m okay with one more chance after an Achilles tear recovery season in a 4th line role. We aren’t pushing for the cup next year anyway, it doesn’t need to be perfect.
Sooo agree on Colton though. But that feels more like an ACGM wish than a reality. I get the cap reasons they’d maybe consider it, but he had a successful year for them. I don’t picture them wanting to move him at all
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 hours ago
Thread:
Entenheim
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GeneralLandro</b></div><div>I like Lundy at 4C honestly — Jones Lundy Leason 4th line??</div></div>
I’m cool with Lunde at 4C. Jones I’m partial to. Frankly I’m okay if we keep either to play 4th line, or let either one go this offseason. Leason should definitely stay
Forum:
Armchair-GM
19 hours ago
Thread:
cc friend
“Nope” - Anaheim
Unless we land Celebrini there’s no reason to move Z. Even if we do, want not a single one of these assets for him
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
Entenheim
This is lacking
No top 6RW, or top 4RD FA that Verbeek said he’d be pursuing this offseason, nor added grit, production, and speed to the bottom 6
Forgot to sign Zellweger
Z isn’t a 3LW
Lundestrom isn’t a 3C
Don’t re-sign Grouxl, and possibly not Lunde as well
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
Blowing It Up
You will find 00000 ANA fans remotely interested in this. Switch the pick to the EDM 1st and it’s a pass from my pov
ANA has no interest in Lilj or Petr. Lilj is not the mold of defender needed to pair with Minty in our top 4. Marner is solid but not at the expense of either Zegras (opening up yet another hole to fill) or our top 5 pick.
There are tons of RD and RWs available this summer. Many better RD options than Lilj (Roy, Pesce), and some comparable to Marner (Reinhart, Stammer short term). We’ll go after those while keeping Zegras and our 1st thank you very much
Forum:
Armchair-GM
20 hours ago
Thread:
Do it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFanForSomeReason</b></div><div>Can't speak for Marner, but Anaheim would be crazy to turn this down. They're getting the way, WAY better player for peanuts - a late 1st. It's really as simple as that if he's coming with an extension. They've got some GREAT pieces in place for the future, are about to draft another and they'd be <em>lucky</em> if even one became as good as Marner. He's still only about to turn 27. Would help them to take steps in the next few years and in years of their competitive window.
Worts case scenario they could turn around and trade him for more than this in 6 months cause the Leafs are getting jobbed.</div></div>
More productive thus far? Totally. But my confidence in the gap between them being worth $6-7M per year and a 1st round pick for a player without the positional flexibility (Z played center the last 10 games), who will be on the decline sooner, and will have a very detrimental impact to the salaries the remainder of ANA’s expiring ELCs will ask for is much less clear cut. I’d totally just rather kee Z and gun for a FA RW. There are an abundance of them this summer. Zegras @$5.7M + EDM 1st + top 6 FA RW (like Reinhart or Stammer) > Marner @$12M.
We both know you don’t trade for Marner with a long term extension in place so I’ll ignore that altogether.
I’d personally just choose to keep building on the foundation in ANA making additions without big subtractions. There are holes to fill, we don’t have many surpluses yet
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 hours ago
Thread:
2024
Unless ANA lands Celebrini for yet another NHL-ready LHC (11% chance) I see no reason why they consider moving Zegras
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 hours ago
Thread:
Probable moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GiggywithGibby</b></div><div>Sure, but you can keep Amil. Foerster and the first would likely be enough.</div></div>
Agree, solid value for Zegras, though I’d prefer something that includes Bonk alongside Foerster instead of the pick and prospect and then more value added on the ANA side
That said, I still see zero reason ANA considers trading Zegras unless they land Celebrini for another LHC
Forum:
Armchair-GM
21 hours ago
Thread:
Do it
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFanForSomeReason</b></div><div>You can do sign and trades or have extensions agreed upon, you just can't have conditional picks based on players re-signing.</div></div>
I guess that’s the same thing to me in this instance. Why is Marner opting to sign an extension to be traded to ANA vs walking to FA where he’d have that same offer if not better from ANA, in addition to being able to explore every other team in the NHL (most of which aren’t a back-to-back bottom 3 team)? I see zero incentive for Marner.
Meanwhile ANA is going to take on an additional ~$6-7M cap to move the younger player and a 1st in a year where they hope to improve but aren’t actually going to be competing. While they have the cap space now, they will be in a much different position the next 2 years with all of Dostal, Mintyukov, Zellweger, McTavish, Carlsson, Gauthier, LaCombe, coming off of ELCs
I just don’t see why ANA or Marner would want this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
New Ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>Yeah well it’s useless to have a conversation with any of you when every single one of you wants a different package and complains when it isn’t the package you want lol like I said I’m gonna start creating Zegras and sending the picks to a random team so stalk my posts if you guys care so much</div></div>
lol I’m gonna let you just be an angry boy. The platform is supposed to be for fun my guy. Try to enjoy it ✌️
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Based on Fans of Other Teams
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>I never said that trade specifically I said Bonk as the main piece. Feel free to re-read if you weren’t able to understand the first time through.</div></div>
I’m not reading through 20 comments here, but quite confident we’re keeping Z over Bonk and some filler pieces. Are the fillers decent value? Totally. But it makes no sense for what ANA’s goals and strengths +weaknesses are
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>By the way ur buddy Jded literally just said on my other post that it costs Foerster AND Bonk to get Zegras. Making what you said completely inaccurate about “nobody has ever said we want multiple impact pieces” like I said all you guys do is contradict each other and then contradict ur selves saying you don’t</div></div>
For Zegras + 🤦♂️ 🤡
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
New Ideas
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GMDannyB</b></div><div>U guys are so funny man this is such a waste of time the other guy literally just said they would take Bonk or Foerster and now ur saying it takes both of them like u guys literally contradict each other by the minute it’s comical</div></div>
It’s almost like we’re different people with slightly different opinions 🤯
Btw, it was both for Zegras +, not straight up. But yes, choosing between Z and either of them individually it’s easily Z
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com