DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
11
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
LivingAnew
Member Since
May 11, 2023
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
403
Posts per Day
1.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Tue. at 1:08 p.m.
Thread:
need more talent
Eh, I don't know if the picks associated with taking on two years of Lee's contract is enough... It's over $10mm in real dollars; even still ~$7mm in real dollars if the Hawks bought him out.
I want 1st round picks. To take on Lee's contract, I'd ask for NYI's 2026 1st rounder - unprotected - in exchange for sending them back their 2026 2nd round pick as part of taking on Lee's contract. The value of NYI's 2026 1st rounder going to the Hawks would stay the same relative to the value of NYI's 2026 2nd going back to the Isles.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sun. at 2:10 p.m.
Thread:
Habs 24-25
Hawks accept, thank you for the 2nd rounder, and buy out Dvorak. Prolly don't even need to offer retention.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 20 at 4:59 p.m.
Thread:
Happy playoffs for those who celebrini
As difficult as it would be to swallow this retention for Jones for six years, I'd do it DAL would. Yeah, it's not much (two future, low first rounders; one of them just an upgrade over the VAN 2nd this year), but better than paying $9.5mm over those same years, IMO... Some retention may be the only way we get out of that contract.
I'd love to see the Marchessault and DeMelo signings as you have them, too. I agree with Hawksguy: they'd be big wins by themselves.
Cheers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 12:06 p.m.
Thread:
JoJo Buyout and Gus Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>Jonathon Marchessault will get closer to $7,000,000 per
Patrick Kane isn't signing for no $3,000,000 and sorry the Wild aren't a cup contender just yet.</div></div>
I'd be thrilled if the Hawks signed Marchessault for two years at $8mm - $10mm AAV, so Bedard would have top talent to play with, and learn from, while our kids develop - prior to his (Bedard's) ELC expiration.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 11:55 a.m.
Thread:
JoJo Buyout and Gus Trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>SoderBLOM*</div></div>
Whoops, yes; thx. Was recently considering whether the Hawks might trade for RD prospect, Victor Soderstrom, and, well, my old age conflated the two! {;- )
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 11:41 a.m.
Thread:
JoJo Buyout and Gus Trade
I think in the Hawks' case, it depends on how they're thinking about Soderstrom. If they think he's not going stick going forward, this proposal (IMO) is a reasonable price for the Hawks to pull the trigger on a bonafide, young, NHL goaltender...
Have Mrazek and Gus be 1A and 1B for a couple years; then, Gus and Commesso be 1A and 1B for a time; and, finally, Commesso and Gajan be 1A and 1B for the reborn Hawks.
Mrazek has shown me that having good goaltending is more important to the Hawks rebuild than I thought. (Indeed, an argument could be made that Mrazek has been the co-MVP for the Hawks this year...) With him in net, the young Hawks got to experience and learn from close NHL games they had no business being in - despite being grotesquely outshot almost every game. Without him, they probably would have been routinely blown out, which may have been MUCH more demoralizing - perhaps, even damaging - to the young Hawks' development.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 10:31 a.m.
Thread:
Home
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hudsonfaschingisdad</b></div><div>It would only be for the final year of this deal</div></div>
Oh, sorry, I missed that (25-26)... In that case, not sure the Hawks will need him then.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 10:27 a.m.
Thread:
Home
I apparently disagree with my fellow Hawk fans here... I think Pageau fills a gap in the Hawks' roster this year while the kids continue to improve/mature. Given the retention, he's not be a huge expense. (Not that the Hawks need the retention.) A late 5th rounder ain't much to give up, especially considering all the picks the Hawks have this and future years.
Then, for year two of his contract, the Hawks have the choice to keep him, buy him out, or flip him (with their own retention added) for assets to a contender looking to fill out their own roster with a cheap, experienced, veteran center who still plays well defensively.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 18 at 9:17 a.m.
Thread:
Next year is 24-25 season
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wz92</b></div><div>Dickinson is not worth 4 bags on a playoff team</div></div>
Those three Hawks players are all under 30 years old, play important roles in the rebuild (and perhaps beyond), and have the advantage of being actual NHL players (unlike the three players accompanying JT in this contemplated trade.) So, it comes down to trading three NHLers of importance to the Hawks, for one year of JT and two, late 1st round picks who may never touch the NHL... I think the Hawks decline.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 10:07 p.m.
Thread:
Turn the Page
At first, I mis-read the pick headed to CHI to take on 4 years of Korpisalo; I thought it was OTT's 1st rounder (!) Hence, I thought that if I were the Hawks I'd pull the trigger on this deal and figure out what to do with Korpisalo, later. Upon further review, of course, I saw that the 1st rounder contemplated here originally belonged to BOS. Ugh... Big difference - prolly the #7 OA vs #26 OA.
I doubt a low 2024 1st round pick is enough for CHI to take on Korpi's four years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 3:48 p.m.
Thread:
Amazing Draft
PIT is a team that really needs to do something like this, as their prospect pool is hurting from have been raided so often to stay competitive and they're low on higher picks this year and next. Apart from Yager and goaltenders, they badly need to replenish their pool. But they don't have their 1st rounder this year, either, to effect such a trade!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 17 at 3:40 p.m.
Thread:
Amazing Draft
I would think PHI would be a team interested in something like this; they need depth in their prospect pool. The question is whether a player the Hawks want will be there at #12 OA?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 16 at 2:00 p.m.
Thread:
Wings
Eh... Send him to the Hawks with a 2nd rounder (even a future one) and if they can't use him, they'll just buy him out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 15 at 10:08 a.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
One last thing regarding Frankie, as I just re-watched some of his postgame interview. He was asked how long it took to fully feel like himself after his significant hip injury last year... He said it was right after the World Juniors! So, perhaps I am overthinking this; maybe that's why he seemed to be inconsistent or was slotted where he was.
Cheers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 15 at 8:52 a.m.
Thread:
Next year
Good job, Wadejos123! I might deploy some players a bit differently (e.g., I'd look to keep Richardson at 3-C), but as the team currently stands, this is a good look.
I might also seek to weaponize our cap space to help certain teams cope with cap constraints or other needs, in exchange for useful, short-term players and more high-end picks (say, players like Anders Lee from NYI, along with maybe Nate Schmidt and Alex Iafallo from WPG.)
I'd also look to add an elite, experienced winger to play with Bedard, as Hall's ability to stay healthy concerns me at this stage of his career... For example, I'd love for the Hawks to sign UFA Marchessault for big bucks on a two-year deal (even up to $9mm to $10mm AAV), for Bedard's RW.
Cheers
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 15 at 8:24 a.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
Hmmm... Didn't he start, too, on the lower lines at the U-20 World Juniors team this year? I remember being mystified by that... Maybe that was why; i.e., he was often slotted too low at U-M? By the end of that tournament, though, he'd become an assist machine - playing up higher, IIRC, and being VERY effective.
That may explain, too, what I saw in two games when U-M visited South Bend this past season (and why Nazar seemed inconsistent to me this year)... The first game, both he and the entire team got shellacked by the Irish, 6-1. (Slaggert was terrific that game.) U-M looked like they had "jet lag" or something. The second game was entirely different, and U-M beat ND in a good game.
I guess reasons for his deployment can only be speculative, without knowing their coach's mind or the dynamics of the U-M team.
Whatever the case there, though, he seemed to fit right in everywhere last night - 5-5; when he almost initially scored crashing the net (prior to his breakaway); and, even on the PK. I know, I know... it was only one game. Luke had good things to say about his overall game - in addition to the threat he presents offensively, he (Luke) emphasized that Frank played a responsible full 200-ft game, as well.
How great to contemplate what the future portends for us beleaguered Hawk fans after the last two-plus years! The fun should continue, too, as recent draftees graduate into the NHL (fingers crossed).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14 at 9:56 p.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>I formally take back anything i've said on this site about Franky needing to go play in rockford next year</div></div>
During the game tonight, I was struck once by seeing Nazar direct traffic in the D-zone (when the Canes were having one of the long stints there). For a kid in his first game to know where responsibly to be - and where others should be - in the defensive zone, and then to talk about it on the ice, said a LOT to me. He very well be up here to stay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14 at 6:04 p.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>newman23</b></div><div>IMO he was playing too low in the lineup too often at Michigan. He (and michigan as a whole) looked great when he was on a line with brindley and mcgroarty but he spent a lot of time centering the 2nd or 3rd line and was never put on PP1.</div></div>
Copy that, newman23; thx.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 14 at 4:46 p.m.
Thread:
Frank is IN
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Same here! Very interested to see where he ends up in the lineup too. I'm also just glad that no matter what Frank was gonna do, he isn't going back to Michigan. I did not like the fit for him there. I felt like they were utilizing him improperly and I also felt like he made plays constantly that were awesome and brilliant but no one he played with was ever on the same page.</div></div>
Hey, Garak and newman23 - thanks for this ACGM and your thoughts. I, too, am excited to see how Frank does.
Garak, can you expand on your thoughts as to why you think Frank wasn't a fit at Michigan? I certainly did notice he excelled in the World Juniors - became a fantastic assist machine there - playing with really good players. Would it be fair to say that his talents were wasted a bit in college; that average players just can't "keep up" with what's possible with him, while superior players can not only "see" what he's gonna do for them but can capitalize on what he does? If that's true, he could make a better pro than college player, yes?
Regarding his contract; i.e., that it took hold IMMEDIATELY and he's burning his first year now... IMO, the Hawks are sending a message to all their prospects: we're gonna give you a shot and not seek to hold you back on earnings. If you perform at a high level, we'll reward you sooner rather than later.
Last, if he's THAT good (including adjusting to the pro game as well as Slaggert seems to have), then the rebuild is really ON. Gonna be great to watch the Hawks grow from here!
Exciting times, indeed.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13 at 1:17 p.m.
Thread:
San Jose Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>I do wonder why he didn't re-sign with SJS, though. Did SJS not like him? Did he not like SJS? Did he just want to go home and put in some more work there? Are there character issues? Etc. Because he played pretty well after being traded there and then he just went home.</div></div>
Yep. All questions that'd need answering...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Apr. 13 at 1:08 p.m.
Thread:
San Jose Sharks
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>If Kaut wants to come back to North America, I think CHI should be interested in a deal like this. I'd absolutely give him another shot for a 7th round pick.</div></div>
And perhaps having a seasoned vet countryman on the team (Mrazek) would be helpful? As you say, Garak, likely worth a flyer for a 7th round pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 30 at 10:43 a.m.
Thread:
Offseason
Outstanding thread, Gents; thank you for all your input! Building NHL teams from a complete teardown is fascinating to me; it's full of mystery and difficulty. And the NHL is perhaps the most team-oriented game in professional sports.
The NHL draft, itself, is incredibly difficult, too - trying to project who a talented teenager will become an an adult in the NHL is fraught with challenges.
None of us is as smart as all of us. The more I learn from posts and threads like these, the better I understand both those challenges and ideas on how to meet them. And the more interesting and fun evaluating the Hawks become to me right now, as well (as opposed to the current roster).
Cheers, LA
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 26 at 8:49 p.m.
Thread:
mk12345
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>I was thinking Ryjo from the Av's to Chicago, but yeah, the Kampf, Robertson and Timmins trades from the Leafs are annoying as well.</div></div>
Yah, RyJo was a good one, too. It's seems as simple as other teams' fans knowing we have lots of both cap space and draft picks, so we should freely be willing to waste those assets to help them solve <em>their</em> problems. And our benefit? To help the Hawks, "reach the cap floor."
Sheesh...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 26 at 7:31 p.m.
Thread:
mk12345
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks obviously decline</div></div>
Good grief, this is getting as bad as - or, dare I say it - worse than all the proposed TOR ACGM trades with CHI. At least with the TOR trades, more than ONE PLAYER is proposed traded to the Hawks. It's almost as though all the VAN fans got together and now believe that the more often they state a trade with Mikheyev to the Hawks for good assets in return, the more likely it'll happen.
I don't know if I can even look, anymore...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 25 at 1:39 p.m.
Thread:
Who rejects this trade
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Kovacevic never had any contact w/ Luke in Montreal. This is some ACGM fantasy. Luke was named head coach of the Hawks 3 months before Kovacevic went from Winnipeg to Montreal. Unless they were talking a lot on the phone or telepathically, they never had any direct contact.</div></div>
Well, I got snowed (he says sheepishly). Thanks for the correction, Hawksguy81 and garak.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com