Marcsnack

Member Since

Feb. 23, 2020

Forum Posts

3324

Posts per Day

2.2

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 10 at 11:06 a.m.

Thread: 3C upgrade

Norris would be a great addition, no doubt.
However, I cannot see OTT running Jarry/Korpisalo for the next 4 years at just under $10M AAV.
CHI trade seems all over the place, cant really see it.
I feel like Graves only gets moved if we take a similar contract back.
Acciari deal is fine.
Kaliyev deal is fine too, but I am not sure he is the guy I want.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 5:39 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SociallyHawkward</b></div><div>Buffalo has zero reason to make that trade. UPL is playing better than jarry.</div></div>

It is the first season Jarry is playing subpar and the first season UPL is playing well. Making this deal gives them two goalies who can compete, and it allows the org to keep Levi in the AHL for a year or two to develop.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 5 at 5:23 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Caniac2000</b></div><div>Canes decline. KK's MUCH more valuable than Smith. And he's unlikely to go anywhere, this certainly doesn't make Carolina consider this.</div></div>

I saw some Canes post where people were saying that they wouldnt mind KK gone. It frees up cap long-term for the Canes. They get a Teuvo replacement and can run Aho, Drury, Kuzy & Staal as their C core.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 5:11 p.m.

Thread: Kotkaniemi scratched

Okay yeah I was told no way yall move him and Staal was way more likely to get dealt... what is the actual value you would look for if he was dealt?

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 5:02 p.m.

Thread: Offseason

Tried that BUF deal. Jarry's 4 years might be a little too long for BUF.
I could see Acciari moved, but not for a 3rd, and not to Boston.
Rakell and Graves are very unlikely to move this summer.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 4 at 5:01 p.m.

Thread: So do we do this

Cant see the Devils taking on so much cap. I could see their interest in Jarry though.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 5:15 p.m.

Thread: Different approach

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LuckyMoneyPuck</b></div><div>That Ned contract is Brutal. There is no way.

Ned walks in FA, Bloom backs up Jarry next year is the most likely situation. When he out plays him, Jarry will be moved out like MAF was.
With the backup for the next year in wbs.

As for the FL trade, anything to get POJ off this team. He sucks. He belongs in the AHL.</div></div>

I was going for a Husso comparable. Has a decent season and gets rewarded with a 3-year deal. Ned has been starting ahead of Jarry, so I wouldnt be totally shocked to see this be the route, but I definitely could just see us keeping Jarry.

POJ is so hit or miss, but I just dont see him having a long career here.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 5:13 p.m.

Thread: Different approach

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BUF10</b></div><div>Sabres don’t need Jarry, Acciari wouldn’t be a bad idea.</div></div>

UPL has been a lot better, but I was just curious if maybe the Sabres would want to give Levi some time in the AHL. Samuelsson is making a lot, and feel like he has underperformed his contract so far. I also think that the Byram acquisition has made him a little expandable, so cap wise it made sense, but I could see BUF rolling with UPL/Levi.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 2 at 4:38 p.m.

Thread: Insane but hey

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Impossible for Rob Blake to trade Pierre-Luc DuBois and keep his job. Even creating enough cap space to re-sign Matt Roy, Viktor Arvidsson and Blake Lizotte won't let him keep his Reserved parking spot.</div></div>

I guess, but its now or never before that NMC kicks in. Smith allows you to not bring back Arvidsson, and you get a good starter while the team is trying to win now.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 25 at 5:32 p.m.

Thread: 24-25 Leafs Look Ahead I

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mortarhead</b></div><div>Is a 2nd doable in your opinion? (as a starting point)
I think Nick would benefit from the bigger role and veteran leadership the Pens have.</div></div>

Possibly, but Idk if we still have place for him. I see us going after a big boy on the LW to play with Sid, and then have Bunting 2LW and O'Connor 3LW.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 25 at 5:24 p.m.

Thread: 24-25 Leafs Look Ahead I

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mortarhead</b></div><div>if the deal includes Robertson over Steeves does that move the needle?
I agree the current package isnt worth a 1st, but we also know very well in Toronto that Dubas likes flipping 1sts.</div></div>

For me, Idk. I would consider moving our current 1st (which will probs be like 8-10) for someone like Keller or Zegras and then giving SJ our 25 1st. I like Robertson, but I dont think he is enough to warrant a high 1st.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 25 at 5:18 p.m.

Thread: 24-25 Leafs Look Ahead I

With Acciari and Eller signed past this season, I cannot see us wanting Kampf. I also think although Steeves and Niemela look good, I cannot justify moving our first when we might be a weak team again if it isnt for someone proven in the NHL.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 10:19 p.m.

Thread: Operation Soft Rebuild Is On

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>edeangel84</b></div><div>What would make you think Florida’s 2025 1st will be a high pick? Calgary already lost their own first next year to Montreal, which is a much bigger issue.</div></div>

MTL willing likely be getting FLA's 1st based on the conditions, so I doubt CGY would wanna send us their 1st.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 10:06 p.m.

Thread: Operation Soft Rebuild Is On

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jamnjon</b></div><div>You can move conditional picks as long as you have the appropriate condition in the trade. For instance, look at the Rangers trade for Wennberg. They sent back, among other things, a conditional pick. The pick was Dallas' 2025 4th round pick and it would upgrade to Dallas' 2025 3rd round pick if Nils Lundkvist scored 55 cumulative points in 2022-23 and 2023-24. The reason it included the condition is because they acquired the pick from Dallas with those same conditions, so they wouldn't own the pick until this season ends for the outcome to be official (it's all but definitive that it'll be the 4th rounder...Lundkvist has 31 combined points in 106 games so he'd need to suddenly start scoring at over a point per game pace from scoring at a roughly a point every 3 games pace this year and a point every 4 game pace last year).</div></div>

Yeah for sure, you are right. I just dont know if CGY is willing to risk potentially moving a high pick.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 10 at 9:15 p.m.

Thread: Operation Soft Rebuild Is On

Hard to see CGY doing that. They move up a bunch, but I doubt they wanna risk not having any 2025 1sts a year ahead. That FLA pick is also in the conditions of the Monahan MTL trade, so not sure they can move it.
Rakell seems like a tough move this summer.
Eller trade seems fine.
Moving MP28 makes us weaker, I dont see the point.
Take out the 3rd for Holl.

Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 9 at 5:57 p.m.

Thread: Next SZN

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Play_Party_Hard</b></div><div>I know Dubas is against it, but I don't think a Reilly Smith buyout would be that terrible. I have a hard time finding a suitable trade for him in 2024-2025.</div></div>

I defo think someone out there pays for Smith. We can definitely trade him for a return.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 28 at 4:28 p.m.

Thread: Pettersson for Pettersson

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jded</b></div><div>I feel so bad for VAN fans on Capfriendly right now</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfkst1</b></div><div>Must be hard having a 1st place team.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>canucksfan43</b></div><div>Seeing our best player in countless trade proposals and new rumours each day about where he'll be next year is exhausting</div></div>

Dont actually think he is going anywhere. Just tryna have fun.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 27 at 3:23 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Coleharborcrosby</b></div><div>If they do this they trade 87 too.</div></div>

NAHHHH

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 8:33 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>Clearing out Whitecloud only gives them $17,000,000 to sign 9 players. And Guentzel alone eats 50% of that if he signs for 8 x $8,500,000.</div></div>

When I check next szn with a projected cap of 87,675,000, I got $21.3M to re-sign Jake, Marchessault, a depth winger (Amadio, Dorofeyev, etc) and a number 6 dman (unless they want Bjornfot there, could be Korczak). Lets say Jake takes 9 and Marchessault takes 7, that is still $5.3M to fill up the squad. This also already includes 3 scratches.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 8:23 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoSeider53</b></div><div>VGK Can't afford Jake Guenzel long term, They're not giving up Brisson and Whitecloud for a rental. Outside of Carolina none of those teams can afford for what Jake Guentzel is going to ask for long term.</div></div>

I actually VGK would be able to sign Jake, especially if Whitecloud is in this deal. Martinez is coming off the books as well, so that is an extra $5M+. They already have a solid top 4 with Pietrangelo, McNabb, Theodore & Hague. Guentzel and Marchessault can definitely be afforded, Stephenson probably walks.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 8:15 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Play_Party_Hard</b></div><div>I've been thinking about FLA as a trade partner for Guentzel. Would love Lundell as part of the return package - would be the future 3C.</div></div>

Lundell would be insane. I just struggle to see FLA being able to extend Jake, so would they part with Lundell for someone who is likely a rental? Idk..

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 26 at 7:50 p.m.

Thread: younger

Hard to see Jake taking 4-5 years. This is his last big paycheck, he will wanna cash out. I really do think trading him is the best option, as much as it may suck. If you manage to trade Smith and Rakell/Rust, I think keeping him becomes more viable.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 24 at 11:12 a.m.

Thread: Okok

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TJTwolf</b></div><div>Avs decline only because they have no interest in a second year of Eller. He wasn't a great fit before for them. Value is actually pretty good though, just doesn't fit with what the Avs need to do going forward.</div></div>

Yeah, that is fair. I just sent Eller because RyJo also has the extra year, so I thought the swap made sense. At least you get a C back as well. Maybe it can be Acciari or Carter instread.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 23 at 4:22 p.m.

Thread: Do any of these Rakell moves make sense

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Missouri</b></div><div>The NSH deal is my favourite as I like Barrie and Glass, but it doesn't fill the teams needs. Barrie would be useless when we already have Karlsson and Letang as OFD.</div></div>

Barrie is in this deal purely for cap. I would not re-sign him. It is more to give the Predators a top 6 forward for a relatively cheap cost, while we clear cap and get a young forward who could use a fresh start. POJ is added to equal out contracts.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 22 at 11:21 p.m.

Thread: Pens

Dont think WPG takes that.
I think the other two are relatively fair value.

First23 Next

Page 2

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Marcsnack

Member Since

Forum Posts

Posts per Day