Edit Avatar

Rob32sjsharks

Member Since

Apr 7, 2020

Favourite Team

San Jose Sharks

Birthday

Feb 1, 1983

Location

San Jose

Forum Posts

2280

Posts per Day

5.76

Forum Threads

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 5:09 pm

Thread: Seriously speaking

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OutCold13</b></div><div>Strome is only a year younger than Hertl and 1/2 the player Hertl is. I value Chytil higher because I don't believe he has reached his ceiling and he would still be young enough to matter when the Sharks are relevant again.</div></div>
I feel Strome is a better player than your giving him credit for
It I’ll take that
Strome and 2021 1st and a mid level prospect for Hertl then

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:35 pm

Thread: Seriously speaking

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OutCold13</b></div><div>I think Sharks would take that deal all day. IMO you have underestimated Buchnevich's value. I think NYRFan92360244 is probably closer to a fair trade.
"Chytil and the first pick for year 2021 and third pick for year 2023."</div></div>

Sharks are quickly making Hertl their face of the franchise and I don’t see them wanting to walk away from that without a massive overpay.

On that note what about Strome and 2021 2nd for Hertl???

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 3:50 pm

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jpsnow13</b></div><div>I'm so sick of this conversation... "DaNaUlt iS a 3c"

Danault is playing first line minutes, with first line wingers, against the other teams first line. EVERY GAME.

Nelson >= Danault > Pageau.

That means 5.5M-6M

(I really dont care if anyone think he is overpaid by 1M AAV)</div></div>

That’s your opinion. Yes he is playing 1C... in no way would anyone consider him a prototypical 1C.
His actual placement would depend on each team but I would say 15 teams would have him 3C 10 would have him 2 C 3-4 have him at 1 C and 2-3 would have him a winger on the 2/3rd lines.
Say what you want throw your fit this is the truth

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 12:21 pm

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mhockey91</b></div><div>I agree with this take. Tbh if Washington trades Kuzy, I could totally see them being in on Danault if he hits FA</div></div>
Mi could see that but really Washington needs to find a sniper to take Ovechkins spot! He can’t keep
Passing up 30-50 goals a year like this into his 40’s

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 12:19 pm

Thread: Now that we have a good 3C

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BCAPP</b></div><div>Kerfoot has a better NHL ppg than this guy has in the khl.

If we are going by single random highlights kerfoot has plenty with his speed.

If this guy turns into more than Barabanov we should be ecstatic. Expecting him to be a 3c on a contender with no backup plan is insane</div></div>

By the way sharks thank you for the Barabanov trade!!!!

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 12:10 pm

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nhl_oilers</b></div><div>I agree, but with what Pageau got, he is going to get that. It’s not wise at all, as it’s too much for them. Plus, the sharks should have never gave Karlsson 11.5M! That’s way too much. All I’m saying is that we can argue back and fourth, but the fact of the matter is, he is going to get a Pageau contract. I just hope it’s not my team that does it.</div></div>

I’m not arguing! The sharks should have never done the Karlsson trade, and the double down and pay him like that for a shell of the player he once was was stupid.
And Canadiens should try and get Danault for less than 5mil and 5 years, use the cap crunch to your advantage.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 12:04 pm

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GoHabsGo99</b></div><div>he is 28, he will be somewhat quality until 33, maybe 34...4.25 *should be* next to nothing in 6 years</div></div>

Well and people thought 3.5/4 would be nothing by now but things change and it will be 2-3 years before the cap goes back up.
It wouldn’t be a stupid signing and I love the player but sometimes you have to look at the big picture and determine where that player fits and if that value fits his spot in the lineup... and if his contract will end up hindering you from signing bigger pieces or more vital pieces in the future.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 12:03 pm

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nhl_oilers</b></div><div>Look at Jean-Gabriel Pageau. Isles traded a first, second, and third for him then gave him 5M 6 years with a NTC. Phillip Danault is getting that in my opinion. Pageau is good, but not 5M good, and neither is Danault. You say people better put up 50+ points if they want that, but Pageau hasn’t. I know it’s a short season, but he’s not even on pace for that.</div></div>

Can’t fault you for your knowledge and no doubt someone will give him a bigger longer deal.... but is that smart? Where the sharks smart for giving Karlsson 8 years 11.5??? It was longer term and more money than anyone else was a
Willing to give! Just cause someone is willing doesn’t make it wise.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 12:01 pm

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ste_Catherine_Street</b></div><div>I agree with you 100%, but...it's hard to argue he's a 3C when he's always played against the opponent's top C. I would have expected KK to surpass Danault now, but Danault is clearly outperforming him by a great margin. So I guess Danault is more of 2C than 1C</div></div>

No doubt he is a fantastic defensive Centerman! But He has to have Uber talented offensive wings to compensate for his lack of offense. I would love a player like him in San Jose! Just not for more than 4.25 a year

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 11:59 am

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>GoHabsGo99</b></div><div>rather give him a 7th year and drop the AAV to 4.25-4.4...he gets his $30M and we save a decent amount on the cap hit</div></div>

That’s signing him way past his quality years and for far too much. Am he will end up hurting you if you sign him for more than 5 years

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 11:56 am

Thread: Working with a Weber LTIR possibility

Webber will play next season in Montreal in my opinion, but I have no doubt he ends up finishing his career somewhere where an owner needs to hit the cap floor but doesn’t want to pay the actual money to do it. That 1 mil actual salary for 7+ mil cap hit plus the name will be gold to a cheap ass owner.

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 11:52 am

Thread: Now what is Danault worth His play has improved since Jan

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SheaWeber6</b></div><div>Something close to this.</div></div>

If you guys give your 3C 5 mil a year your screwing yourselves financially. He is a 2C on weaker teams and. A 3 C on top teams I see him as a 3.5-4 mil a year max.
I really like him but he needs to put up 50+ points if he wants 5m+ a year

Forum: Armchair-GMWed at 11:49 am

Thread: 2020-21 All Rookie Team

Knyzhov IMO has been stellar for the sharks! He pushed Vlasic and Simek out of top 4 D spots for the sharks and has been a stable stay at home Defensman opposite the “why play D when you make 11.5 mil a year” heartless sad excuse for a D man karlson. The fact Karlson Isn’t a -28 is 100% because of Knyzhov play!

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 9:06 pm

Thread: Strome and Zad

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Beetlejuice</b></div><div>Edited:
He's Buried in the minors</div></div>

That is more cost effective and eats 1 more year of the contract and if he comes to camp and clicks he’s a good player to have on your bottom 6 come playoff time

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 5:35 pm

Thread: Strome and Zad

Cost wise it’s actually more cost effective to play Neil 4th line this season than buy him out

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 5:34 pm

Thread: Win lottery and get Luke Hughes

I don’t even think Luke Hughes is the consensus #1 I’ve seen him ranging 4-6

Forum: Armchair-GMTue at 1:17 am

Thread: Better

That Meir trade is a slam dunk for sharks even without the 1st

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 5:13 pm

Thread: Hertl

If that is the offer sharks accept. That’s a tall
Order and a lot of pieces but those pieces would make losing Hertl palatable.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 4:27 pm

Thread: Would this Sharks team make the playoffs in the regular pacific div

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>goodfella</b></div><div>I think we're a top six, middle six, and defensive center away from being a good team. We have people that could develop into that, but will they?

I hope Karlsson rebounds. I don't think I've ever seen a player regress like that.</div></div>

I’ve seen it a lot, players get that big payday and just loose the hunger and their edge.

Skinner, Bobby Ryan, Neil, lucic, to name a few and I could go on.

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 4:25 pm

Thread: Sharks Acquire a 1C to Save them like Jumbo did in 2005

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharks_1999</b></div><div>Eichel is only 25 though. Plus you're getting a Franchise 1C at the behest of 2 2nd Line Wingers. You need a 1C on a hockey team - Hertl/Couture won't get it done</div></div>
Hertl/ Couture is a good 1-2 combination on most teams, that’s not our issue our issue is the need of more entry level pieces and 1-2 more top 6 wingers to push everyone else down a notch and set us up with solid depth
That and out goaltending is attrocious

Forum: Armchair-GMMon at 1:06 pm

Thread: Would this Sharks team make the playoffs in the regular pacific div

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>I think the Kings are going to take a big step this offseason. But yeah, as a Ducks fan, I can confirm that it's a pretty weak division.

The biggest thing I'd be worried about when it comes to the Sharks (in this situation), is the continued regression of Burnsy, Vlasic and Karlsson. I'd also assume that Hyman gets more $$$ than that, or at least more term. Guy is a really solid player.</div></div>
Karlson is still solid I have a feeling he has a rebound year next year after his first season in a long time without a season ending injury.
Burns still is elite.
Hyman is getting 5.5 a year for 5+ years
But still we need another top 6 forward
Balcers will be protected he looks like a solid middle 6 piece for us.
I want to stay away from Berniers and go after Driegder.

Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 9:14 pm

Thread: Sharks Acquire a 1C to Save them like Jumbo did in 2005

This is not the same arms the Thornton trade.
We stole Thornton for pieces we no longer needed.
This is destroying our draft capital 3 of our better young pieces and two of our top 6 for 1 guy. Learn from
The Karlsson trade. To much for one piece is almost never positive for the team picking up the 1 piece.

Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 7:58 pm

Thread: Cya Jake

Why or how are you getting jakes contract terminated?

Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 6:24 pm

Thread: Going HAM for the boys

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Filip Gustavsson has been very good. Matt Murray has also been solid since coming back. I think what Matt Murray needs to be great is a backup who can push him like Fleury was</div></div>

That’s true! There are goalies who need that guy stealing games to push him

Forum: Armchair-GMSun at 4:07 pm

Thread: Going HAM for the boys

Sharks would love tierny back! Him and Labanc would be good together

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

Rob32sjsharks

Member Since

Favourite Team

Birthday

Location

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

Forum Threads