T0R

Member Since

Aug. 7, 2020

Favourite Team

Toronto Maple Leafs

2nd Favourite Team

Colorado Avalanche

Forum Posts

3605

Posts per Day

2.7

Forum: Trade Machine ProposalsFeb. 21 at 12:24 a.m.

Thread: 3-Way Madness

This is Alot Harder to do 3-way trades then it should be

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 4:46 p.m.

Thread: Kings perspective

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Chychrun-Doughty
Anderson-Clarke
Gavrikov-Spence</div></div>

That seems like overkill for no reason, they need a Goaltender more then a Injury prone D-man for a side that already has a Top 2 that do their jobs well

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 2:41 p.m.

Thread: Saw this Article 3-Way Deal Leafs Perspective

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>So your argument is, to weaken the Kings defense to help the Leafs because the Kings can obtain 1.5 years of Saros who is playing some of his worst hockey since entering the league? And that Rob Blake who is on the hot seat should take more risks when his job is on the line and LA has actually started to string together wins?</div></div>

This is under the impression that Roy makes it clear he doesn’t want to sign,The concept that i am “Weakening” the Kings D-core is very laughable, tho i do have a simple solution, an addition to the trade

Kings get Carrier to replace Roy from Nashville, in fact i was making that mock trade perspective right now

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 2:36 p.m.

Thread: Kings perspective

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>csick</b></div><div>Sens might swap Chychrun for Roy and another piece</div></div>

So he can play the 3rd pair?, both their Top 4 LD have term & are legit Top 4’s, Last year before Gavrikov maybe i doubt it now

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 2:36 p.m.

Thread: Saw this Article 3-Way Deal Leafs Perspective

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>tryger</b></div><div>Rittich is out playing Saros right now, and LA won't be able to afford Saros without retention as they have Lizotte and Grundstrom coming off LTIR eventually.</div></div>

Bro you ever hear of buying Low?, He’s been a Vezina calibre guy for nearly 3 straight seasons, you get him behind a Good defence in LA he could carry you to a cup

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 2:34 p.m.

Thread: Preds Perspective

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>nativewulf</b></div><div>I don't think the Kings would get rid of both Spence and Roy.</div></div>

True, Maybe Niemela from the Leafs then

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 19 at 1:38 p.m.

Thread: Preds Perspective

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>nativewulf</b></div><div>It's an interesting idea but nothing coming back to Nashville that would make me think Trotz pulls the trigger. Chromiak isn't a prospect in a position Nashville needs and two firsts without a premium prospect isn't a lot for Saros, when both picks will probably be after 24 in this scenario.</div></div>

Probablt Spence included

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 19 at 11:56 a.m.

Thread: Saw this Article 3-Way Deal Leafs Perspective

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kyle_Okposo_Lover</b></div><div>This seems very fair for each side. As long as an extension is in place or hes open to it, I think toronto does it. This is way better than Tanev imo Roy is 28 and fits the timeline way better. Extend fo like a 4x4.75 or so and its great</div></div>

Tbh i think this is the first everyones pretty happy move i’ve seen from TheHockeyWriters

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 1:58 p.m.

Thread: Chychrun

Chyrhrun retained gets better than that

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 11:50 a.m.

Thread: Thinking Out Loud

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pens1991</b></div><div>Thinking pretty stupid.</div></div>

He should stop thinking lol

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 11:05 a.m.

Thread: Byram for Knight

Chatfield doesn’t need a prove it deal he’s been great & Knight doesn’t have Byrams value

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 11:00 a.m.

Thread: Not buying at the deadline for once

Tverberg is underratedly good so they decline

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 10:16 p.m.

Thread: Seller again lol

Kings probably decline

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 9:55 p.m.

Thread: Frisky Deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SHOWTIME_TTV</b></div><div>You need to keep up with recent events. CGY has made it clear that they're not avoiding trades within their division(hence the trade with VAN).
Ceci doesn't devalue the trade. He's not even necessary(neither is the 6th), that's my point! Tanev won't be more than a late 1st and will come with retention(pretty standard stuff for that return). Believe it or not but if EDM got Tanev than TOR would be trying to get Ceci if he's available. EDM could realistically add Tanev and keep Ceci with a 3rd party team. Ceci has value! This trade is just crap!</div></div>

LMAO Leafs wouldn’t go near Ceci again bud but keep thinking whatever you want & news flash trading to a despised Provincial & Divisional Rival is different then a Divisional rival, Edmonton has to likely pay extra not to mention Vancouver overpaid on Lindholm & they asked for no retention

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 9:53 p.m.

Thread: Dr Schultz old saying in Django

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boltsradynasty</b></div><div>Because this is an open discussion site. The offer is a bunch of spare parts for quality assets.</div></div>

How tf is this spare parts?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 4:42 p.m.

Thread: Dr Schultz old saying in Django

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>boltsfan71</b></div><div>flames decline</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boltsradynasty</b></div><div>Where's this so ridiculous offer it has to be considered?</div></div>

Explain to me why they’d decline & why Lightning Fans are commenting on it?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 4:35 p.m.

Thread: Dr Schultz old saying in Django

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Beats what we have seen outta Calgary…but sounds like rentals would only be last resort for NJD</div></div>

Hence why I didn’t ask for a 1st

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 8:58 a.m.

Thread: Tarasenko

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Duggysdanglers</b></div><div>He had that last year and fetched a first plus. They also sent a LD with him.</div></div>

Fair play but idk with the way picks are being held this year, Vegas will do it tho they draft well enough to make up for it

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 8:20 a.m.

Thread: Tarasenko

I’m just gonna say it. Tarasenko has all the control with his NMC, don’t think you’ll be getting the best of returns

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 8:16 a.m.

Thread: Frisky Deadline

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SHOWTIME_TTV</b></div><div>WTF are you talking about?... A 1st would do it. Ceci has another year, Holloway is taking a big step and worth keeping as a cheap replacement who can play up the lineup next season. The kid could be a top 6 NHLer in a couple years. Who are you watching?
Ceci + 1st + 6th is an overpay!</div></div>

See Adding Ceci devalues the move, Calgary will likely be offered a 1st without that bad of a cap dump attached & no they can’t flip Ceci next TDL or else you wouldn’t be trying to dump him on Calgary rn, you’d move him separately to create the cap space you’d need for Tanev, I’m also gonna say if the Flames have issue with trading to Treliving then they're certainly gonna have issues trading to their provincial rival & that jacks up the price especially with retention which the Flames front office hates to ever do

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 8:12 a.m.

Thread: One trade fix

This is certainly uh Interesting

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 8:09 a.m.

Thread: Final attempt

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>aadoyle</b></div></div>

Forgot the + which really could be anything but I suspect is someone close or contributing rn at the NHL lvl (bottom 6 or B lvl guy)

But yea if Flames declined what the other guy said 1st + prospect thats not good

As its a gamble to wait to much sometimes we saw it happen last TDL with some guys who were supposed to get traded but GM asked to much then ended up getting little to nothing lul.

Tanev should get a nice return but Conroy also got to be careful[/quote]

Not to mention with Tanev’s injury history, Conroy is playing a dangerous game

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 8:08 a.m.

Thread: Final attempt

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lunatik</b></div><div>That CGY fan is terrible at these. And the reports were Calgary was OFFERED a 1st and a prospect for Tanev but turned it down for now hoping to get a 1st</div></div>

That makes little to no sense

They want a 1st so they turned down a 1st + because they want a 1st?

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 16 at 2:23 p.m.

Thread: r1 exit so fire Keefe hire Berube

This is awful

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 16 at 2:22 p.m.

Thread: Alright what is the price

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sammy_daws1997</b></div><div>Probably a non-starter tbh.

The Flames would be down to 1 right shot defenseman (Tanev) and they likely will move him anyways.

The ask would have to involve either Cowan or Minten imo, which the Leafs have said is off the table currently. Andersson also has 3 years left at a friendly cap hit, plus the Flames seem to love him.</div></div>

Minten & Lilly, probably throw in Holmberg too since you want Centers (this is just as a base), this is a scenario where Brad would have to bite, cause this is a massive needle moving trade

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

T0R

Member Since

Favourite Team

2nd Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day