DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Cost Per Point
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Cost Per Point
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Salary Cap History
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
TheOtherAuston
Member Since
Dec. 8, 2019
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
1844
Posts per Day
2.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
7 hours ago
Thread:
Agree
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Windjammer</b></div><div>And is an expensive 7/8D. No interest.</div></div>
I agree two mill is expensive for a 7/8 but we both know he isn't a 7/8.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 hours ago
Thread:
Agree
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Windjammer</b></div><div>Winnipeg has no need for replacement level defenseman.</div></div>
Well it looks like Winnipeg would have zero defenceman then, (every defenceman is replacement level except Makar Hedman so on and so forth) Winnipeg doesn't have that. The point is Holl is a more than serviceable PKr and eats minutes.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Possible move off top ten pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I'm not sure that the risk that Petersen turns out to be awful is worse than the risk that Muzzin's injury woes recur. Plus, Toronto needs to improve their goaltending and needs to get rid of at least part of Muzzin's burdensome cap hit, whereas Los Angeles has many alternatives to taking on Muzzin's contract, so the incentive is all on one side.</div></div>
The leafs don't have to get rid of muzzin though, he's still an effective top 4 Dman and I personally think his injury problems are overblown by a fair margin, plus the alternative would be a package with Sandin or niemela to acquire a cheaper goalie with less risk. I'm not saying there isn't incentive to this deal but I think it's on both sides LA Is dropping a year off their books right when the cap is supposed to explode
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Possible move off top ten pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Only Cal Petersen's $5 million, which solves your goalie problem (hopefully), but the last time I suggested that, Leafs extremists excoriated the idea of paying that for "a backup goalie."</div></div>
I wouldn't call him a backup but he definitely didn't have the best year last year, I could see a possibility of a muzzin Peterson deal but Im not sure what it looks like, both teams take a gamble but leafs gamble is riskier due to the extra year, maybe a pick swap of some sort?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Possible move off top ten pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>Right now, due to the Fiala signing, we have about $1 million to spend at LD. Some other adjustment(s) would have to be made to absorb Muzzin's massive cap hit. If you start by retaining $2.25 million (40%), we might be able to make something work.</div></div>
That's a good point, I forgot to look at LAs cap situation I don't think the leafs would do the retention unfortunately, they should but if it came down to it I just don't see Dubas doing it, is there a contract LA is looking to move?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 hours ago
Thread:
Possible move off top ten pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boldirev</b></div><div>The Garland trade makes no sense for Vancouver at all short term or long term. Sandin has no spot as Rathbone will play 3 LD and the rest just clears cap for Toronto. Kerfoot to balance out cap I can see, but a prospect we need (Knies or a young RD) and a higher pick would be necessary.</div></div>
I don't think garland is a player that the leafs would move knies for, but I understand your reasoning.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
23 hours ago
Thread:
Possible move off top ten pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>beantownboy17</b></div><div>Love the OTT trade, makes sense for both sides but may need to eat some cap on Nylander, 1.5-2 mil. Selling Muzzin only makes sense if you replace him with Carlo and while I don't think Boston is selling, that package is impossible to say no to. An A prospect, a B prospect, a B- prospect, a 1st, and a 2nd? Overpay honestly.</div></div>
I don't think the leafs would entertain cap retention plus there is really no need with what I had stated in the trade, as far as the Carlo trade I couldn't tell, he's exactly the type of RD we need and he is at a great caphit with term so I thought it would take an overpay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
24 hours ago
Thread:
Possible move off top ten pick
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>*If* you knew you could keep Nylander for more than the 2 years here, this would be a massive steal for the Sens.</div></div>
Yes I do agree with that, I took that into account with the fact that I don't believe Nylander would stay.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 12:20 p.m.
Thread:
Chicago Rebuild
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Most of that TOR trade just pays for dumping Mrazek. But I think people will probably wait on Kubalik and Strome to hit free agency if they aren't qualified. Which is a shame because, qualified or not, I think there is significant interest in both of them and an opportunity for CHI to get more assets in trade if they wanted to go that route.</div></div>
Niemela will not be included in dumping mrazek and I wouldn't give him up for kubalik so leafs definitely do not do this
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Sat. at 6:37 a.m.
Thread:
Cup winning
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Quillanrocks</b></div><div>I like a deal that's out of the usual "box" involving Kerfoot or Holl or Mrazek (or all of the above)! Nice! (and thank you!!)
Seattle IS looking for younger players to help fill out its new AHL roster, but with so many options to acquire minor leaguers, I think Francis would counter by declining the 3 players Toronto is offering and dropping the Nashville 2nd Rounder. (I'd use the Carolina / Nashville trade from last years draft as a benchmark, where the Preds moved up to 27 OA by trading 40 and 51) If that didn't cut it, maybe throw in a 4th of 5th Rounder, but not three 2nds. JMO
So . . . .
To TOR: 35, 58 & 117(?) To SEA: 25 OA
Do you think TOR would accept, decline, or make a counter offer?</div></div>
I think the point of the Seattle deal that the OP made was to re acquire the leafs 2023 2nd for the purpose of the offersheet to Oettinger. So it would need to be a counter with that included.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 8:30 p.m.
Thread:
highly unlikely
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>If Toronto is asking for Zacha, Blackwood and top-2 pick...NJD should be asking for Marner over Nylander.</div></div>
Zacha is a average third liner and Blackwood is a gamble, though I agree that Nylander isnt worth 2OA on his own there is more than enough going with him to create fair value in this deal, but I don't think either team says yes. Leafs don't do it because they need those young players to be something soon,and NJ doesn't because of uncertainty on Nylander extension.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Fri. at 6:46 a.m.
Thread:
2022-23
This deal does not improve the leafs, it only improves Detroit, and Florida's cap situation.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 6:01 p.m.
Thread:
Jack In Our Box
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>cody_tugak</b></div><div>If he wants 6 mill, I'd givhim 2 years at 6 mill, his play will likely go down after his 3rd on that contract</div></div>
Then you won't get him, I think his minimum term is 4 years and I think he will either get 6M right away from a team but if it drags out 5-5.5M
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 11:51 a.m.
Thread:
Jack In Our Box
Campbell will reportedly receive 4-5 years at 6M per Darren dreger
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Thu. at 5:14 a.m.
Thread:
Renovations in Vegas
Theodore is great and all but the leafs aren't giving up 4 roster players for him. And I don't think they would even entertain Bunting in a deal tbh.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 6:18 p.m.
Thread:
Kind of Realistic off-season
2nd for kerfoot nothing less.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 5:56 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JhonnyCanuck5</b></div><div>Rasmussen, Velano, Zadina, Berggren and maybe Suter all have more upside than Kerfoot.
Larkin, Raymond, Bertuzzi, and Vrana are all already better than Kerfoot.</div></div>
Lmao Suter does not have that upside. I would also argue the rest of the players in that paragraph should have shown more signs to the upside by now.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 5:55 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JhonnyCanuck5</b></div><div>Leafs fans: Asking for a 2nd for Kerfoot and comparing Kerfoot to Bertuzzi
Wings fans: we don’t want Kerfoot, don’t see him as an upgrade
Which one looks unreasonable???</div></div>
You are high if you think I was actually comparing the two, it was a simple statement to the blatant nonsense said about kerfoot. If you actually read it again you would understand that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 3:44 p.m.
Thread:
Based on other agms Ive seen
Leafs aren't interested
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 3:37 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡</div></div>
Those circus lessons definitely payed off for your investment, might I suggest investing in reasonable thought next time?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 3:29 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>I just named 4 out of the 6 that's top 6 and better then kerfoot. 3 more years is a joke. They will be competing for one next year and if they don't make it, will the year after. Go check their prospects and whose coming. Better then anyone you will see in blue and white for a long time</div></div>
I literally just said kerfoot would be #6 can you not read?
Not likely with the way the divisions are right now I don't even think they will jump the Bruins next season maybe the season after that. The only way they grab a spot is wild card if the metro doesn't take both spots (which I see as more likely)
Edit: that's what all wings fans said about veleno and zadina and all the others than weren't as good as expected.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:50 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>Yeah, bertuzzi and vrana aren't better then kerfoot and top 6 options. Keep drinking the first round kool-aid bro</div></div>
Lol I never said kerfoot was better, I am in fact saying he would be #6 in your top six. Your just delusional to think that your top six "options" are anything other than fourth liners, and you can't convince me otherwise. I'll call it here, Detroit won't see the post season for atleast three more years.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:46 p.m.
Thread:
putin together a team
Big ole pass from leafs
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:44 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>Kerfoot is useless and worthless. I rather ice 4 players on the ice then have this slug on the team. Let's not help out a team that has cap issues by taking a player from there who would be in the bottom 6 and not help the team 1%. He's not better then anyone we have in our top 6. He's a 3C at best and wings have 2 of them already</div></div>
I mean outside of Larkin and Raymond your top six is a middling six 🤷
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Wed. at 2:42 p.m.
Thread:
Thoughts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JhonnyCanuck5</b></div><div>Dude just compared Kerfoot to Bertuzzi… more like Adam Erne</div></div>
LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 how blind you must be.
1
2
Next
Page 1