SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

dls9

dls9
Member Since
Feb. 14, 2017
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
315
Posts per Day
0.1
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 20 at 3:50 p.m.
Forum: Mock-DraftNov. 27, 2023 at 2:19 p.m.
Thread: 2022 redo
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 8, 2023 at 2:03 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>The_Ginger_Leaf</b></div><div>Philly probably says no
Leafs will laugh at the Matthews trade

I’m all for on that nylander trade. He’s got to go. Knies will easily replace nylander. New core 4

Trade Matt Murray of course or keep him whatever
Sammy is gonna get more money and woll is ur starter, he’s more than ready.
Don’t resign ZAR
Buying out Murray is dumb
Bring up steeves and holmberg. Or whoever is nhl ready from the marlies.

Knies-am34-marner
Jt-ROR-jarnkork
Steeves-kampf-Acciari
Laffy-holmberg-Mcmann

I’d trade Lily tbh he hasn’t done much unless he proves himself in training camp and preseason then fine.

McCabe-Brodie
Reilly-schenn
Gio-timmins
Lily* if he’s good</div></div>

I think the trade (Matthews) is pretty comparable to the Tkachuk trade.

You have a (normalized 82 game average over last 3 years) 105 point player in Auston Matthews. Matthew Tkachuk is a 93 point player. Therefore, the value of Matthews (based only on this metric) is 13% more than Tkachuk. Matthews is better defensively, Tkachuk brings physicality and agitation. To me, these cancel.

So, I would expect the return for Matthews to be 13% higher than the return for Tkachuk. If I were to rank the value of players in this deal vs the Tkachuk deal , it goes

Huberdeau &gt; Slavin &gt; Teravainen &gt; Weegar. Overall, Huberdeau + Weegar &gt; Slavin + Teravainen. The difference is made up by a second first round pick. I don't think it's a "Laughable" deal
Forum: Mock-DraftJan. 4, 2023 at 3:52 p.m.