DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
jance
Member Since
May 16, 2022
Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
2nd Favourite Team
Pittsburgh Penguins
Forum Posts
100
Posts per Day
0.1
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 10, 2023 at 3:55 p.m.
Thread:
Different options other than Cgy
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>If the Hawks do decide to trade Murphy, this probably gets it done. Might want a pick instead of Holmberg.</div></div>
Yeah, agree. Don't mind taking klingberg for the year. But I'm not overly interested in Holmberg. I'd take a mid round pick instead.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 27, 2023 at 11:37 a.m.
Thread:
Bye Cat
Cat is coming off a down year, and he's due a sizeable contract. I really like cat, but he's not worth 2 firsts. Detroit says no to this.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 8, 2023 at 12:06 p.m.
Thread:
Went Wughes
Hawks decline, they don't need a Jake Allen, and if they trade for one, it would be a cap dump, so you'd have to pay them to take him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
May 17, 2023 at 11:29 a.m.
Thread:
Monster deal for 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quote:</div>They have no one to play with Conor and they wont for a few years.</div>
Lukas Reichel is ready to jump to the NHL, Nazar will likely come over at the end of the season next year, Kevin Korchinski will be ready to make it to the NHL soon as well. Philipp Kurashev is already with the hawks and is showing to be a useful player. Are they ready to contend for the playoffs now? No, but they're only a few years away. Trading away a potentially generational talent because they are going to have to pay him in a few years seems like a poor reason to make a trade. You build around players like Bedard.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Mar. 3, 2023 at 6:13 a.m.
Thread:
After the cup
The Blackhawks don't need Hall right now, they certainly are not going to give up picks for a cap dump.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Feb. 16, 2023 at 6:37 a.m.
Thread:
All the way to the cup
That's gonna be a pass from the Hawks. A Kane at 50% this year, the Hawks are likely going to ask for a 2023 first, and at least a high prospect. I wouldn't be surprised if the Hawks ask for a higher price than that, I would probably put him at a first and a prospect, maybe another low-level pick for salary retention, maybe. Laffy is going to be a second or a combination of 3rd and 4ths. Thing that really kills this deal is the Hawks are rebuilding and looking to rebuild by building their prospect pool. They are not retooling right now, so players like Kerfoot or Engvall are not going to help the hawks at all. So the Hawks would likely view that as a salary dump. It's likely they're included to make the deal work, but any cap relief you're trying to get with a trade your gonna have to pay for (not just with the hawks, but with any team. The rest of the league is not going to help Toronto out with their cap management out of the goodness of their hearts.)
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 11, 2022 at 3:48 p.m.
Thread:
Patty Kane
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jco5ta5</b></div><div>1) Kapanen fits the idea that Hawks have SOME form of experience on the team and he'll likely be moved up to 2nd line role and may produce a little bit.
2) Poulin is still young and could grow into a nice middle 6 forward. He did a respectable job in the AHL.
3) Penguins haven't missed the playoffs in a long time so <strong>these picks are def not lottery picks</strong> but they could easily be in the mid to late teens. I can envision if Malkin isn't back and Letang maybe is injured or regresses somehow that the 2024 might be a middle of the round pick.
Idk...I think if Hawks are hellbent on trading Kane, this works.</div></div>
Doubt Kane will waive for a team that isn't a contender, so any draft pick coming back from a Kane swap is going to be a late first. This honestly isn't that bad of a return for Kane considering he would really be in the driver's seat, and he could VVVVEEEERRRRYYYYY easily screw the hawks, who have been doing nothing other than trading away teammates he likes playing with.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 8, 2022 at 3:30 p.m.
Thread:
Offseasonpossible Jones deal
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Devsfan25</b></div><div>This would get it done IMO. Philly wouldn't even offer 5OA, and we are offering 2OA and a top 20 prospect</div></div>
Well, not for nothing, but I much rather would have had this return than the one the hawks got...
So much for rumors.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 7, 2022 at 1:57 p.m.
Thread:
Offseasonpossible Jones deal
According to rumors, the hawks are looking for 3 firsts for Cat. While the second overall would soften that a bit, this deal is still likely short of what Davidson is looking for.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 6, 2022 at 8:59 a.m.
Thread:
Flyera
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sk540</b></div><div>I agree with everything you said, which is why i think that the ask is ridiculous. Of course, why wouldn't they keep him? 24 y/o's with two 40+ goal seasons is certainly impressive. He did have one of the most dynamic passers to ever play, on his line for most of those years as well. For me, he's not worth it. <strong>For the Hawks, in a rebuild though, is he worth the salary? Can they even afford it?</strong> I'm sure someone will give up a haul for him and good for the Hawks if they wait a team out. I for one, hope it is not Philly.</div></div>
They can. As of right now, the hawks have about 16m in space, and that's before Kane and Toews' matching 10 million comes off the books next off-season. If Kane is still here, I could see the team trying to resign him. I'm not so sure they would pay to resign Toews.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 5, 2022 at 11:44 a.m.
Thread:
Blow it up
As a Hawks fan living in the Cap's marketplace, I'd rather keep that 2nd than get Samsonov. He's not the long-term answer in the net, and if we're looking for short-term answers for a goalie, I'd rather get paid to take a cap dump, or sign a cheap, bad, FA who will help our chances at Bedard.
I also think the Hawks could get a better package than that for Cat. If the Hawks move him (I would prefer they didn't) I would prefer a top 5 pick in the 2022 draft be coming back in the trade package. Otherwise, keep him and rebuild around him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 5, 2022 at 11:38 a.m.
Thread:
Flyera
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sk540</b></div><div>You also have to realize that he has a QO of 9mm, and will be a UFA a year after that. Basically a team is not only giving up a haul, but is taking a huge risk without an extension. I am not saying that is going to extremely lessen his value, but it does have to be taken into account. I would assume a top 5 pick, a future #1 and an A prospect is a good start, it would just depend on what other piece or two. I would say this would be a mid-level pick and a B-ish prospect. I would doubt it would take another 1st or a young prospect who is a bonafide NHLer.</div></div>
According to rumors out there, the starting asking price for the Cat is: a 2022 first, two additional firsts, a high-level prospect ready to make it into the NHL this year. And yes, that is a very high ask for him (I also want to state for the record I don't necessarily agree with this ask, as if it were up to me, they wouldn't even be listening to offers him), but it's high for a reason.
The Hawks aren't shopping Debrincat, they're listening to offers.
For any team to trade for Debrincat, they're going to have to exceed the perceived value the hawks have of him by a certain amount. That perceived value is quite high right now because:
1:He's only 24
2: he's already a 2X 40-goal scorer.
3: he apparently likes being a Blackhawk and wants to stay in Chicago
4: he's (from reports) a great teammate and likely a future Captain if he stays.
5: apart from Kane, he's really the only fan-favorite left that brings people to games, and represents a significant income for a team looking to go through a painful rebuild.
6: Since coming into the league, he's improved his game every year. He isn't just a sniper, he's a 200ft player who even kills penalties.
The Blackhawks likely know that Debrincat is worth probably around 2 firsts +, or a combination equaling about that. But if a team is only going to offer the Hawks what Debrincat is worth, they would likely prefer to keep him. One bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, so they say. But if someone is willing to overpay on him, that is likely something the Hawks would listen to, and exactly what they did with the Hagel trade at the TDL (Hagel, for the record, is not worth 2 firsts, and 2 nhlers).
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Jul. 5, 2022 at 10:38 a.m.
Thread:
With Debrusk I guess
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruinsforlife</b></div><div>Yeah but they can trade back smith at the TDL for a 2nd depending on his season (more than hardman and kalynuk could return for sure)</div></div>
Yeah, people have said that about other trades for the hawks. The problem I have with that is the Hawks will likely be looking to be historically bad this year to try and have a chance at Bedard. In that case, I can't see a lot of players having a "good" season on the team, and I doubt their value is going to go up with us.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 5, 2022 at 9:31 a.m.
Thread:
Flyera
The Hawks have already reportedly turned down a package of a high draft pick in the 2022 draft, an additional first, and a prospect. This package isn't gonna come close to getting you cat.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 5, 2022 at 9:28 a.m.
Thread:
3- Team Trade - This is the Way - YOUNGER - BIGGER - FASTER - TOUGHER
Blackhawks pass. As you pointed out, Entwhistle is younger & cheaper. The hawks are in a rebuild and likely looking at this coming season as a lost season, so sending out a young player who's still developing for a player like McGinn doesn't make much sense. Petterson is interesting, but again, by the time the Hawks are ready to compete again, he'll be 3-4 years older, I'd be more interested in a pojo type player (younger defensemen on the cusp of breaking into the league). I know the Pens aren't going to trade him for a deal like this, as he's a good defender on an ELC. Barring that, Blackhawks would likely be more interested in draft picks than anything else.
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Jul. 5, 2022 at 9:18 a.m.
Thread:
With Debrusk I guess
Don't mind the Hawks moving Hardman and Kalynuk, but there's no reason they would want Craig Smith. They're rebuilding, and an aging forward doesn't help them with the rebuild. The only reason they would take him would be as part of a cap dump, which the Bruins would need to pay for with draft picks or prospects. If the Hawks are moving a prospect like Kalynuk, they'll need another prospect coming back, or draft picks. They aren't interested in aging veterans.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 3:46 p.m.
Thread:
Doing the isles as a rangers fan
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Isles5513</b></div><div>I don’t know that it was a bad deal by Tampa tho lol. If you have Vasilevsky then those picks should be in the mid twenties anyway.</div></div>
Probably not a bad deal (definitely wouldn't be viewed that way if Tampa won the cup), but I would personally say Hagel shouldn't really be worth any more than a 1st +.
He's played only 3 years in the NHL (one of those years was only 1 game), and only 108 games. In those games, he's accounted for 30 goals, and 31 points. You could point out that he's young, but he's only a year younger than Debrincat. He was having a career year in goals when he was moved at 21.
I liked Hagel, but I don't think he's worth what the Hawks got for him. Even if they are late firsts.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 1:46 p.m.
Thread:
Doing the isles as a rangers fan
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Isles5513</b></div><div>Yeah but saying you want a one sided deal for the hawks on this site isn’t necessarily realistic either lok</div></div>
I'm not saying I want a one sided deal, I'm saying the Hawks do. I don't want a deal at all. I like Debrincat and want him to stay in Chicago. I think the Hawks arn't going to let him go unless they're blown away by a trade offer. Hagel wasn't a fair deal either, but that's what it took to get him out of Chicago. A Debrincat trade is going to be even larger than that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:41 p.m.
Thread:
Blueshirts 22-23
Reaves does nothing for Chicago, and him playing there isn't going to help his trade value going forward. So essentially this is a Dach for Georgiev swap. Chicago has young goalies that are developing in the AHL and college. Georgiev might make sense for the Hawks if they were getting ready to exit their rebuild and just needed a goalie who was ready to take the reins and be a #1, but they're not at the point yet. They're a good 3-4 years away, and their prospects are likely going to be ready by then. In the meantime in goal, they'll likely take a salary dump goalie, or sign a cheap FA that teams can light up on a nightly basis. That's not to say if available the Hawks wouldn't take Georgiev, but they're not going to give up one of their better center prospects to do it. Not without something else coming with him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 12:34 p.m.
Thread:
Doing the isles as a rangers fan
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Rangers13232</b></div><div>I am a rangers fan therefore I'm not tryna look for a great deal for the islanders. <strong>This is as neutral as possible.</strong> Chicago never getting more than this</div></div>
I think this is the problem a lot of people have with Debrincat trades, thinking that the hawks will let him go for a neutral, fair hockey trade. They won't. And it's fair to say the Hawks won't get any more than this. It's not like they want to move Cat, and if he stays he's an excellent player to build around and likely the next captain in a year. It's a similar position to Hagle at the TDL, they had no need to move him, Tampa just way overpaid with 2 firsts and 2 NHLers for a mid-line player who has never touched 40 points.
For any team to get Debrincat, they're going to have to not only meet his value to the hawks but exceed it. Again, they're not trying to move him, they're simply listening to offers. A team is gonna have to put up an offer the Hawks simply can't refuse. Freedman has already reported that the hawks have nixed a huge package that featured 2 firsts, one of which was reportedly very high. Another reports that the starting ask for the Hawks is 3 firsts, + an High level NHL prospect who is already in the NHL or ready to make the jump.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 11:39 a.m.
Thread:
What a dumpster fire
According to <a href="https://twitter.com/CMBollin/status/1542567360430850048?s=20&t=izRSRRw9ovKi8RGoCv7eUA" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">Freedman</a> the hawks have turned down better offers than this. Another rumor I've heard stated that the current starting ask is 3 firsts and an NHL-ready prospect.
It's a high price, but understandable considering:
1:The Hawks do not need to move Debrincat
2: Debrincat doesn't want to leave
3: Debrincat is a very young, 2x 40 goal scorer. Since coming into the league he continues to improve areas of his game. To the point he is now killing penalties, stripping pucks and creating his own chances.
4: Though he's a high salary, he's also an RFA, so the team getting him can control his rights for a few more years.
5: If the Hawks don't move him, they're still in a good position, as Debrincat is the type of player you could build a team around.
To get the cat, your gonna have to beat the value he has for the Hawks, which is very high. I honestly don't think the Flyers should really think about it, as it will cost far too many futures that they would need to build a team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 11:31 a.m.
Thread:
Wangs
Don't think the Hawks would do that. Elliott Friedman (https://twitter.com/CMBollin/status/1542567360430850048?s=20&t=izRSRRw9ovKi8RGoCv7eUA) reports the Hawks have turned down a sizeable offer for DeBrincat that would have included multiple firsts. I've also seen a rumor that the starting point for Cat is 3firsts (one of which must be in the 2022 draft) + a high-value prospect that is NHL ready. This deal falls short of that.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 10:05 a.m.
Thread:
CHI2023
Word is that Chicago has had better offers presented to them that they've turned down, so this Cat trade isn't enough.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jul. 1, 2022 at 7:35 a.m.
Thread:
What debrincat will cost
Supposedly the Hawks have turned down a package that involved 2 firsts (one being a "high" one). Their supposed asking price is 3 firsts, + high prospects ready to make it to the NHL. So with the salary dumps in here, I doubt this would do it. If your gonna go with 2 firsts, it's likely going to cost more than just some "ok prospects," it would probably cost high-level prospects. So no, I don't think this would get you cat.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jun. 30, 2022 at 3:42 p.m.
Thread:
offseason
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Garak</b></div><div>Judging from the recent reporting about offer(s) Davidson has already turned down for DeBrincat, that isn't gonna get it done.</div></div>
Yep, sounds like the current asking price for Debrincat is 3 firsts, + a high-value prospect. Freedman is reporting the Hawks have been presented with a deal that would involve 2 firsts (one of them a "high first") and they turned that deal down.
If a team wants the Cat, it will cost them.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com