ragger_lord

Nuck Fan

Member Since

Sep. 22, 2020

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

Forum Posts

721

Posts per Day

1.2

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 18 at 4:08 p.m.

Thread: Thoughts - Playoff Caps

Minor details could be worked out but Canucks accept imo

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 4:03 p.m.

Thread: The trio retires together

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pensfan89</b></div><div>Well I never said the Canucks would or should do that deal. I simply said they will come in screeching “Marino or no deal” because that’s what they always do in any trade involving Miller, Boeser, or Garland. I think it’s silly that the Canucks would be willing to give up Garland for anything so soon tbh. I think they will stick with him for now.</div></div>

Fair enough.

I agree with you on Garland. He was really good to start the year, is locked up long term, and we paid a pretty penny to get him.

Imo Miller and/or Boeser get moved before him unless someone really blows us out of the water with a Garland deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 4:02 p.m.

Thread: The trio retires together

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LetsGoPens69</b></div><div>Heinen a 2nd and 5th isn’t free. A 4th and 5th is. Heinen is 26, a RFA and has 11 goals and 21 points in 41 games this season. Garland is 25 has 11 goals and 26 points in 44 games</div></div>

That second is probably ~ 20 ish spots higher than the third the Canucks are sending back, thats minimal value.

Garland has a higher career PPG, and is signed long term whereas Heinen is due for a raise.

It would be a really terrible trade for the Canucks.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17 at 3:44 p.m.

Thread: The trio retires together

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Pensfan89</b></div><div>1.) no way in hell the pens give the rangers Kapanen for practically free lol.
2.) angry canuckers screeching “Marino or no deal” incoming</div></div>

Canucks fans aren't gonna screech that but why on earth would the Canucks make the proposed trade?

You say no way the pens give away Kapanen for free then expect the Canucks to do that with Garland

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 16 at 3:21 p.m.

Thread: can they afford to resign kadri

They can buy they shouldn't.

Kadri is rocking an insane on ice shooting percentage that will regress. Signing him to a contract based off this year is a foolish move you're better off letting another GM do

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 16 at 2:51 p.m.

Thread: Florida is the best candidate for a Chychrun deal

This is a good proposal because it really makes you think.

The pieces Florida are moving aren't impact players this year so it definitely gears them up for a cup run. However, Knight is a very hard piece to give up and having him cost controlled as an insurance policy against Bob's 10mil would be huge as well.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 16 at 2:28 p.m.

Thread: deadline moves

If the Canucks aren't getting Schneider that's a fair deal

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 16 at 12:06 p.m.

Thread: How to be better next year maintaining cap space

I know Smith hasn't been good this season but that's a lot to give up for Garland.

Maybe Boeser

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15 at 7:05 p.m.

Thread: Smaller moves

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boomer125</b></div><div>I'm not opposed to the TO trade, I just don't see why TO needs to add to their Pierre Engvall collection</div></div>

Depth never hurts in the playoffs I guess was my theory. Maybe Schenn would be more enticing (though I honestly don't rly want to move him)

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15 at 7:01 p.m.

Thread: Smaller moves

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Boeser or Garland …or Pearson…would help NJD more than Dickinson. Maybe Dallas would want him back</div></div>

Fair enough. I wasn't necessarily set on you guys. A return to Dallas might make sense.

If you would want Pearson for late picks I would do that.

I was trying to keep this AGM small so didn't want to do a Boeser or Garland deal

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 15 at 5:49 p.m.

Thread: Canucks stay good

It's easy to stay good when you rob other teams blind

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14 at 7:15 p.m.

Thread: A couple deals

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NJDevils1317</b></div><div>Why are the Devils taking on a bad contract AND giving up a 2nd for a guy with 3 more points this season? I agree Garland is better, but doesn't seem worth it.

Zacha had a great year last year too, 4pts short of Garland. Maybe Garland is just a liiiittle bit better?</div></div>

Wishful thinking mostly haha? I feel like Garland just has a better rep but you're right regarding their points.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14 at 6:33 p.m.

Thread: Optimistic off season

Inb4 people **** on the trade without reading the description.

Unfortunately I don't see a way to move that money and gain those assets without a 1st + being moved.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14 at 6:17 p.m.

Thread: VAN trade worked by Gardoki and Canucker

It's been reported Halak won't waive.

Hog for Kapanen just doesn't make sense.

Hog has another year of ELC and Kapanen is looking for a raise. Canucks are also better off betting on Hog improving rather than trading for a stop gap

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 14 at 5:50 p.m.

Thread: Caps Canucks talking trade

Caps are probably looking at Pearson for late round picks or maybe Garland which probably stars with McMichael or Lapierre

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 13 at 4:20 p.m.

Thread: Zacha

I doubt we get Zacha for a bunch of garbage.

DiPietro has terrible AHL numbers, Dickinson's not a needle mover at all. He's worth less than when we traded a third for him. Brisebois will be an NHL 7 if he's lucky and a third is a third.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 13 at 4:19 p.m.

Thread: If edmonton wants to win mcdavid out nurse out

This might sound like non sense but McDavid isn't worth that. At least not to NYR.

Swapping out a Norris winner and potential Vezina (and possibly Hart) winner for McDavid doesn't make their team any better. Honestly it probably makes them worse.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 13 at 4:17 p.m.

Thread: Other options

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Zacha + 2nd. Maybe add a prospect.</div></div>

As much as I don't like it because we paid so much for Garland, that's probably fair.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 13 at 4:15 p.m.

Thread: Other options

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>PeterForsberg21</b></div><div>I don't see Halak waiving for EDM.</div></div>

You're probably right

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 8 at 12:39 a.m.

Thread: Allvin Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Meh. I think we would probably stick with Tatar. What would Pearson bring that’s different?</div></div>

That's what I thought. They are both kind of "meh" players this year but Pearson has the longer contract which in this case probably decreases value.

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 7 at 11:08 p.m.

Thread: Vegas Cap Troubles and Chychrun

That's a pretty fair Chych deal imo.

Vegas probably trades out of division though, even if the value is close

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 7 at 11:03 p.m.

Thread: Allvin Offseason

That Zadorov contract is a Jim Benning special. Please no, we're past that

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 7 at 11:02 p.m.

Thread: Allvin Offseason

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NHLfan10506</b></div><div>Why would they sign Boeser to only 1-year?</div></div>

It doesn't make any sense

Also, what do you think about the Pearson/Tatar move? I feel it favours Vancouver

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 7 at 1:00 p.m.

Thread: oilers fan does calg

Canucks aren't taking back Monahan

Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 4 at 9:48 p.m.

Thread: CBC316

Ruston any has a couple months left. Why would they move him for 2 longer term cap dumps

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

ragger_lord

Nuck Fan

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day