rangersandislesfan

rangersandislesfan
Member Since
Mar 10, 2017
Location
Vancouver
Forum Posts
23204
Posts per Day
32.45
Forum Threads
988
Forum: GM Game 2018-19Thu at 5:42 pm
Thread: 2018-19 GM Game - General Discussion
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_K</b></div><div>Yeah, the discussion triggered some of these changes. I think voting transparency should help too, if you have to defend your decisions. And yes, only the 2019 1sts are implicated.



Interesting, but I think using an overall category for offense and defense might get people to think about these same things while also accounting for forwards that excel on defense and offensive d-men.

One thing we've been discussing is using the final standings (which rank Forwards and Defensemen) to define a sort of "pre-matchup advantage". Would be similar to home-ice advantage but something that we can directly quantify thanks to our standings...</div></div>

"Defence" as in official position of defence or how well the whole team is defensively? Same with offence. I didn't think of that.
Forum: GM Game 2018-19Thu at 5:17 pm
Thread: 2018-19 GM Game - General Discussion
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>A_K</b></div><div>Only GMs will vote, no AGMs. And GMs of the teams involved AND GMs of the teams that own 1st round picks of the teams involved will not be able to vote on those series.</div></div>

So what's all the discussion about unfair voting for? If teams with 1sts from that team can't vote, i think that solves the problem. I don't think the 2nds, 3rds, etc will cause unfair voting. Also, just to confirm, it's only if another team owns their 2019 1st that they can't vote, right? (Example: Dallas owns Tampa Bay's 2020 1st round pick. Tampa Bay is playing Columbus in the playoffs. Tampa Bay and Columbus each still have their own 1st round picks in 2019. Am i correct that Dallas could vote on the series?)