sedin33

Member Since

Jul 8, 2018

Location

vancouver

Forum Posts

687

Posts per Day

2.39

Forum Threads

POSTS

THREADS

LIKES

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GM1 hour ago

Thread: zucharello

No way Schenn gets a 3 year deal

Forum: Fauteuil - DG21 hours ago

Thread: mtl change

Why would Vancouver do this deal?

Forum: Armchair-GM21 hours ago

Thread: For fun big offseason changes

Vancouver accepts :)

Forum: Armchair-GM21 hours ago

Thread: No choice for playoff push

I don't agree with your premise re that they need to make the playoffs from now on so sign the free agents.

That said, aside from the Ferland signing, I don't mind the others as the term and dollars are bad. There just too many of them.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 5:24 pm

Thread: Kessel is NOT going to Vancouver

Vancouver says hell no.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 5:21 pm

Thread: Weaponizing cap space

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bb1983</b></div><div>I understand, but I don't think it's as simple as just swapping them in the above trade...Tampa is going to need a LOT of cap-friendly guys next year, and he is one of the best options available. I feel like if Tampa was willing to move Foote, they would have done it this past trade deadline to beef up for a cup run *this* year.</div></div>

I think they may be rethinking who's available given their playoff experience.

For JT Miller and Callahan + 50% Tanev is fair. Don't need to include Virtanen

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 4:52 pm

Thread: Weaponizing cap space

For the Tampa deal, I would prefer a deal centered around Foote as opposed to Miller.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 4:31 pm

Thread: Moves with EDM and VAN

Eliminate the 4th rounder from Vancouver and I think we have a deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 2:25 pm

Thread: Deal with Canucks Sign Hayes and Ferland

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dmh1055</b></div><div>What is an 80 point player's cap hit supposed to be?</div></div>

Maybe he's worth the cap hit for Philly or others, but hard no from Vancouver

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 1:58 pm

Thread: Deal with Canucks Sign Hayes and Ferland

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Dmh1055</b></div><div>He's not that old and hasn't shown any signs of slowing down. You're acting like he's 33 or 34 with 5 years to go. He should be fine to be his normal high value playmaker for the duration of his contract. He's not the greatest of shooters nor is he the fastest of skaters. He has great awareness of where the open man is and makes it look effortless. That type of high skill player typically lasts well into their 30's.</div></div>

I said old relative to Vancouver's core the oldest of which is Horvat who's 24. He's 5 years older than him. Pettersson just turned 20. Vancouver is building a team around him. Sorry the ages don't match up. Further, he's not worth the cap hit.

Forum: Armchair-GMThu at 11:36 am

Thread: Deal with Canucks Sign Hayes and Ferland

Voracek is too old relative to Vancouver's core, hasn't scored more than 25 goals, and is over paid. No thanks from Vancouver

Forum: Vancouver CanucksApr 12 at 8:43

Thread: who should the canucks DRAFT at 10 or trade up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Canucks1</b></div><div>Hughes
Kakko
Poldkolzin
Turcotte
Byram
Cozens

Will be gone forsure imo.

Dach
Zegras
Krebs
Boldy

So hopefully
one of these guys in that order.</div></div>

I’m not sure about Dach. I think his transition to the NHL may be longer. Is his hockey sense strong?

Forum: Vancouver CanucksApr 11 at 7:01

Thread: who should the canucks DRAFT at 10 or trade up

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Eclipze</b></div><div>If NJ offers you 1OA for Juolevi, Horvat and maybe one of your goalie prospects with the 10th pick Vancouver would be dumb to say no.</div></div>

As a Vancouver fan, it's an interesting proposal and very good value for Vancouver, but I think it's a step back for the Canucks.

They need quality and quantity right now. At 10th hey could get either a top six forward or top four defense. Adding that to their core > subtracting Horvat... and adding Hughes. Part of my reasoning is that I still think Juolevi will be a top 4 d.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr 10 at 9:05

Thread: Trades with VAN TB TOR

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BurgerBoss</b></div><div>Why though</div></div>

I don't think the quantity makes up for the quality of Hughes

Forum: Armchair-GMApr 10 at 8:52

Thread: Trades with VAN TB TOR

vancouver says no

Forum: Armchair-GMApr 9 at 1:03

Thread: Winger for PeteyBo Canucks win Lottery

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Booyah</b></div><div>Who would you suggest the Canucks look into acquiring?</div></div>

I would to a young RHD. Those aren't cheap. I would be willing to take a bad contract to acquire the player.

I would suggest something like Callahan + Foote from Tampa for Tanev (50% salary retained) + prospect like Brisebois. I know Callahan would need to waive, but I think you understand the type of deal.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr 9 at 12:11

Thread: Avs get FOA pick amp unite Hughs Bros

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TJTwolf</b></div><div>Which is why I don't think it's logical and the Avs would say no thanks. Pretty sure the Canucks signed one Courtnall brother only to trade the other the next season. It's hockey, not a family love in! If the Avs were looking for a marketing opportunity a better one would have been trading for Slavin, Carlo or Terry by now. Colorado born kids.</div></div>

Reasonable take. Not saying it’s the right decision, only if that’s the choice they made.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr 9 at 11:19

Thread: Winger for PeteyBo Canucks win Lottery

If we win the lottery and pick Hughes, I don't think we need Skinner. I would rather invest in the defense particularly RHD

Forum: Armchair-GMApr 9 at 9:02

Thread: Avs get FOA pick amp unite Hughs Bros

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Spanky227</b></div><div>as in i'm not a fan of vancouver or colorado.. and button has different

<a href="https://www.tsn.ca/top-50-nhl-affiliated-prospects-1.1241869" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.tsn.ca/top-50-nhl-affiliated-prospects-1.1241869</a></div></div>

Yes, that’s right. On Vancouver radio he said Makar had an extra year to develop. While both played 2 years in college, Hughes played his first year as a draft eligible player. There are some who will prefer Hughes and others Makar. Point is that they’re comprable

Forum: Armchair-GMApr 9 at 8:26

Thread: Avs get FOA pick amp unite Hughs Bros

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TJTwolf</b></div><div>The only real logic behind this trade would be if the Avs were convinced Timmins is going to come back and they're keeping Barrie. Then it might make sense as the Avs are arguably weaker on the left D in the future and Hughes would compensate for that. However it should be a one for one swap.</div></div>

Why would Vancouver do it if it’s one for one? They are happy with Hughes and he’s younger.

The premise of the deal would be to let brothers play together. Aside from any additional chemistry, it’s a marketing opportunity.

I’m not advocating for the deal, but this is what I think it would take to get Vancouver to take it.

12 3 Last

Page 1 of 35

ARCHIVE

CBA

PLAYERS

EASTERN CONFERENCE

WESTERN CONFERENCE

CALCULATORS

TOOLS

sedin33

Member Since

Location

Forum Posts

Posts per Day

Forum Threads