sharksdoee

sharks88

Member Since

Jul. 3, 2019

Favourite Team

San Jose Sharks

Forum Posts

353

Posts per Day

0.2

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:57 p.m.

Thread: Using comps

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DFinn91</b></div><div>I’d do that Sharks trade. Worked out well the last time we got a young Swedish right shot wing from the Devils.</div></div>

I'd maybe do it, assuming they wait until they're up on the clock with pick 14 and no one they wanted fell. Although in this draft I think a surprise guy or 2 will fall to the mid teens and it'd be more worth it to select them.

Forum: Armchair-GMTue. at 12:34 p.m.

Thread: Draft day trade with SJ for the PIT pick

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DFinn91</b></div><div>What’s with the Grier hate? He’s been on the job 2 years and he’s already cleaned up the Sharks cap situation, amassed at top 5 prospect pool, secured the best odds at Celebrini, and has two 1sts in the next two drafts.</div></div>

I don't completely dislike what he's done with what he was given and think he's been fine, but for every solid trade he makes there's another head scratcher value wise. That Burns trade with retention was awful from the start and only got worse. Not sure how he retained on Hertl for 6 years and gave up 2 high 3rds in the process for what amounts to 2 late 1sts. EK trade was fine even though he was coming off a great season because his cap was a limiting factor.

Did great on Duke and Meier.

Now that the cap mess is (mostly) clear, I expect him to have some experience and make good decisions value-wise in both draft (his 2023 was A+ in my view) and trades here on out.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 1:28 p.m.

Thread: Making Stamkos a Lightning for life

You're likely going to need to pay to get rid of Sheary.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 12:25 p.m.

Thread: Doing All 32 Teams Realistic Offseasons Sharks

At this point it might take a 1st to move Kuemper. A mid-late 2nd probably doesn't get it done.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1 at 12:24 a.m.

Thread: send it

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DFinn91</b></div><div>Sharks accept.</div></div>

4 years @ 5m for a 3rd isn't great value, even if Rakell is still maybe decent. But not producing well next to Crosby and Malkin isn't a good sign that he's going to do much of anything in SJ.

Forum: Fauteuil - DGApr. 25 at 3:20 p.m.

Thread: Question of the cost of Malkin

2 years for him on an already good contract plus retention is going to start at a 1st ++

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 2:33 p.m.

Thread: Cup Time

At this point I'd just take that for SJ, get a 3rd 1st in a projected deep draft. Assuming a goalie would need to be moved first.

If SJ moves on from one or more of their RDH then I wouldn't mind Ceci for a year.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 25 at 1:24 p.m.

Thread: Divisional rivals make a big move

Probably a yes from Sj, especially if Sturm is moved.

Forum: Fauteuil - DGApr. 24 at 4:38 p.m.

Thread: Packing picks for bad contracts

BUF and WSH pass.

I can't see GMMG taking on Campbell without a 1st.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 24 at 4:11 p.m.

Thread: Next year

no retention spots + Burroughs, Rutta, and Benning are all RHD signed for next year + Addison / Emberson RFA.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 11:35 p.m.

Thread: Enough or too much

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pmbrouillard</b></div><div>how would they also get parehk?</div></div>

just saw CGY in '25. Whatevs, they'll still get a quality player with that pick so sub with similar player from next draft.

Overall point stands should be too much.

Forum: Mock-DraftApr. 23 at 11:32 p.m.

Thread: Sharks need a win here

LW isn't a big need for SJ but if Eiserman drops there you gotta take him, as a big time sniper is certainly a need in the prospect pool. That'd be an amazing start to the draft.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 11:27 p.m.

Thread: Enough or too much

Wayyyy to much. Should be a yes from SJ even though it'd suck missing out on a guy with NorCal ties.

Lets even say Dach flames out: still Lindstrom/Catton + Parehk/Yak + a minimum as it seems now top 4 D in Guhle. Should be plently of quality and quantity to make that a yes for SJ.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 8:21 p.m.

Thread: Draft to ONL

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sharcuda22</b></div><div>TBH i dont see why the sharks dont. We get a player that is perfect timeline for the rebuild and is better than we would get with the first (unless vegas explodes in the offseason).</div></div>

Only because Knight could be a gamble, but with upside of course.

Lundell seems to be a very good 3C, but especially if SJ gets the #1, C won't be a pressing need and same with LW which are the positions he could play. Rather see that Vegas 1st put to use drafting or trading for a RHD. In the end I wouldn't hate the trade though as I think the values great and it could end up working out very well for SJ. But also can't see FLA doing it with Bob's age and Lundell's key 2-way play for them.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 8:12 p.m.

Thread: Draft to ONL

Unfortunately yes that's way off for Andersson.

I can see both teams declining that FLA swap.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 8:08 p.m.

Thread: Speed up rebuild

If Smith and (hopefully Celebrini) play in SJ next year a guy like Lindholm would be a great short term addition if he can't get the long term contract he wants this year. Longshot of course but give him 1 yr 9ish mil to help the young guys out for a bit and if he plays well enough trade him with 3rd party retention at the deadline.

No to the other big deals for now, wait 2-3 years to get big ticket - long term UFAs.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 4:38 p.m.

Thread: Trade Down Pricing

If SJ gets Celebrini I could see them doing this to take a D that might not fall to 14 (ideally a RHD Yak/Parehk).

If SJ doesn't win #1 and they take Lev then less likely for them to trade up, but maybe if a top 6/7 consensus guy they like falls then who knows.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 4:12 p.m.

Thread: SJ Thoughts Expanded

Of all the posts to delete they delete that one? lol.

This is certainly a very good framework for a trade, although I can see SJ asking for another mid rounder since Sturm's been valuable to them.

I'd look at it as the 2nd to dump Holl, then you'll need to add a little bit of value to the Fabbri-Sturm swap.

But as I posted on the deleted ACGM it seems like RW fans say SY isn't paying to dump contracts. But if he were this seems like a solid start of a reasonable swap.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 23 at 1:47 p.m.

Thread: honestly want to know if either team would do this

Probably no from the Devils, FW is the last position they need to spend big for.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 20 at 10:46 p.m.

Thread: Waiting for the Kids

No use giving OEL that term, Mukh should be given an opportunity sooner than later.

Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 17 at 7:11 p.m.

Thread: 24-25 Sharks

Can't see leafs doing that even though the value might be around that - 5m on Granlund isn't where their focus would be, although a cheap, cost controlled 6D like Benning could be of interest.

Could see fair dump value for Schmidt being attaching a 3rd and mayyyybe another later one like a 6/7 and the Sharks would accept.

Forum: Mock-DraftApr. 13 at 8:09 p.m.

Thread: Canadiens

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawk</b></div><div>Chicago is loaded at left defense, they are not taking a left handed D man no matter what</div></div>

Especially with Demidov there, that'd be a great fit. Tough to reach for anyone else there, the top 3 should more or less be locked in I feel.

Forum: Fauteuil - DGApr. 12 at 1:45 p.m.

Thread: Realistic idea 24-25

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ht42</b></div><div>- SJ likely gonna accept for only 5 spots in the draft, that's massive.
- NJ it's the one that I'm really not sure about it.
- Caps likely accept. Great guess for them.
- Torts will gonna be happy about it.</div></div>

It's a strong offer, but SJ needs quality prospects at this point and their best bet to find one in this draft is with a pick in the teens.

Forum: Mock-DraftApr. 11 at 5:44 p.m.

Thread: My Order of Preference For SHARKS ONLY

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DFinn91</b></div><div>No shot the Sharks use the 3rd overall pick to get another undersized wing.</div></div>

Fair, but I'd say he's in a rare tier where it might be worth it. It's not like Gush and Bords are cracking the top 6 on a competitive team. A blue chip RW is certainly needed, maybe Martone in '25, bigger and more of a Grier size.

If SJ takes Lev, I'd like to see MBN with that Pitt pick.

Forum: Mock-DraftApr. 11 at 5:10 p.m.

Thread: My Order of Preference For SHARKS ONLY

If SJ is at 3 and Celebrini & Lev are gone you wouldn't go for Demidov? He's not dropping to the Pitt pick and he'd immediately be their best Wing prospect and seems like quite the sure lock to be a fixture in the top 6 at worst for a long time.

12 Next

Page 1

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE