Because cap space is so critically important for the Sharks? And they're willing to part with a top-15 pick in a deep 1st round draft? For one year of John Tavares? Who's barely a negligibly positive at this stage of his career??

I think you are trying to send Vegas 7 million more additional in cap. No thanks lol

Bro stfu you’re annoying . You always have something to stay. How bout keeping your fat mouth shut. Your from Vegas wtf you know about hockey you bum.

I know I’ve watched more cups in my lifetime than you bud.

Kick rocks kid. You clearly don’t know ****.

I think you've massively overvalued Järnkrok. Also if you can't handle a little criticism, maybe posting on here isn't a good idea.

Sorry, but that is funny.

VGS cant afford that.

Why would CHI give up a high 3rd for a guy who appears injury prone, old and signed for 2 yrs?

If PIT's mission is to get as old and slow as possible, then maybe they take Tavares

And some of your UFA signings are really light, and Liljegren comes back as a RFA with rights for 300k less? not to mention Knies isn;t a 1st liner and its a real jump to think Cowan comes in at 2nd line, or that 2 goalies that have never played more than 35 games in a season is the answer?

I think Hawks decline because they have plenty of bottom 6 players already, no need to waste picks on acquiring more.

take out the first and pit accepts

Sorry Blokey, doesn’t seem like people agree with your takes. I on the other hand, strongly disagree with your takes. Almost none of these signings or trades are realistic. Maybe on whatever NHL video game you’re playing, but I can’t see any of the GMs or players involved buying into this.

Got em

Well, VGK tells you to kick rocks but Toronto does as well...

Why go through the hassle of trading Marner for Theodore to stack your DCore, only to trade away your number 1 defensemen?

I would cost a 1st and Minten for TOR to dump Tavares on the penguins.
No one wants that contract.