MoxNix Profile - CapFriendly

Forum: Armchair-GM13 minutes ago

Thread: Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MoxNix</b></div><div>Lily is a bottom pairing D on the Leafs a team that didn't have a good D corps and he doesn't hit. Pachal and Kylington weren't bad playing 2nd pair in Calgary. Do we want better defensemen for the 2nd pair? Sure but Lily isn't the answer.

Hanley got waived by the Stars not the Flames. He was actually surprisingly good defensively in Calgary, not just on the bottom pair either. Is he a long term solution? No probably not but he's better and cheaper than Lily. Then there are all the prospects who are NHL ready or close.

On top of all that, Lily is an arbitration eligible RFA with a 1.5 mil qualifying offer or roughly double what Hanley and all the prospects make. Hard pass on Lily, he has almost no value to Calgary.</div></div>

Forum: Armchair-GM21 minutes ago

Thread: Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>I'm not a huge fan of the player but be realistic here. Kylignton was OK, got better towards the end of the season but we still don't know what we're getting. I like Miromanov, but his sample size is way to small to know what he going to be. Pachal is a bottom pairing d man who hits. Hanley got waived and couldn't even solidify a spot on our bottom 6 last season.</div></div>

Lily is a bottom pairing D on the Leafs a team that didn't have a good D corps and he doesn't hit. Pachal and Kylington weren't bad playing 2nd pair. in Calgary Do we want better defensemen for the 2nd pair? Sure but Lily isn't the answer.

Hanley got waived by the Stars not the Flames. He was actually surprisingly good defensively in Calgary, not just on the bottom pair either. Is he a long term solution? No probably not but he's better and cheaper than Lily. Then there are all the prospects who are NHL ready or close.

On top of all that, Lily is an arbitration eligible RFA with a 1.5 mil qualifying offer or roughly double what Hanley and all the prospects make. Hard pass on Lily, he has almost no value to Calgary.

Forum: Armchair-GM45 minutes ago

Thread: Flames offseason

Calgary considers the PLD trade.
Replace Bastian with a player/prospect who isn't a pending UFA and Calgary might consider the Markstrom trade too.

Forum: Armchair-GM57 minutes ago

Thread: Leafs

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>That's got to ɓe the worst Marner to the flames yet. If we're going for marner it is to make the playoffs, how are we going to do that with Liljgren as our #1D?</div></div>

Lily would be more like the 7th D with those two gone. With them still here he be on waivers after training camp or traded for a late pick before camp.

Kylington, Miromanov, Pachal and Hanley would all be ahead of Lily on the depth chart and it's very likely so would at least 2 of the prospects.

Forum: Armchair-GM1 hour ago

Thread: Leafs

Calgary does not want Marner! Toronto really doesn't have anything Calgary would trade Andersson + Weegar for unless Nylander is part of the return.

Forum: Trade Machine Proposals1 hour ago

Thread: Marner to CGY

Calgary has no interest in Marner. Find another team to dump him on.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: Turn around

Horrible for Calgary!

Besides Robidas belongs on the island his father was banished to.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: Berube was traded for Gilmour

Calgary doesn't want little Nicky.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: Going Going Gone

Colorado and Calgary decline.

Rantanen > that entire Leafs package

Calgary might trade one of Andersson or Markstrom for that package but not both. Remove Kamph and it probably does get one of Andersson / Markstrom, the other 3 unwanted players could be flipped for late round picks.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: How Id Fix the Team if Staios was Abducted by Aliens and Andlauer Named Me GM

Pittsburgh, Toronto and Calgary all say no.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: well that was embarassing

That isn't getting Weeger especially not with retention.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: finally some change

Calgary doesn't want Robertson and the late 1st only pays for the 2 years of retention on Markstrom you have to pay for Markstrom himself too.

Forum: Armchair-GM6 hours ago

Thread: 2nd round exit

Calgary says no.

Forum: Trade Machine Proposals8 hours ago

Thread: V2 Marner to cgy

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bossdirge</b></div><div>I mean I'm sure Calgary would love this. You're trading a barely league average goalie for like 135 points of scoring and a franchises second best prospect</div></div>

ROTFL

Calgary doesn't want Marner but make it Nylander and you have a deal.

Forum: Trade Machine Proposals21 hours ago

Thread: Think Big

Holtz > Anderson
5th > 10th
3rd > Harris

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:28 p.m.

Thread: Blockbuster Trade w OTT

Calgary declines. Cap dump Korpisalo is a deal breaker for Calgary. It makes no sense to waste 2 retention slots that way either, it'd make way more sense to retain more money one of the two players. They should be willing to retain 50% on Mangi and might even be willing to retain 50% on Markstrom but not on both.

Calgary would take Yakemchuk over Parekh and Iginla won't still be there at 9th.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:27 p.m.

Thread: Toronto

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shaun80</b></div><div>Without Kuzmenko who's Marner going to pass the puck to?</div></div>

Matthews like usual because he won't be going anywhere unless the Leafs retain salary and accept a whole lot less than their fans think he's worth.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 9:25 p.m.

Thread: Lindys

That doesn't get Coleman.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:55 p.m.

Thread: what the leafs should do

Calgary has absolutely no interest in Marner unless he only costs like a 2nd. In that case they take him to retain 50% at the deadline and flip him for a late 1st.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:49 p.m.

Thread: retool

That Coleman deal is terrible for Calgary.
NJ can keep Lazar and Casey they aren't worth much anyhow.
Connor Sheary is too old to fit the Flames now plus he's a small left shot forward too, about the last thing Calgary needs or wants. They keep Vladar too if that's all they get offered.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:45 p.m.

Thread: Flames 2425

Small left shot forwards are not what Calgary is looking for. Calgary will keep Mangipane until the deadline if that's all they get offered.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:42 p.m.

Thread: Changes I think should be made

That's not getting Andersson. It isn't even close enough for Calgary to even bother making a counter proposal.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:40 p.m.

Thread: Berube

A late 1st + a pile of trash doesn't get Markstrom.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:38 p.m.

Thread: Minor Shakeup

Calgary has no interest in Brannstrom. None whatsoever. An RFA who was overpaid on his last contract has negative value.

Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 8:35 p.m.

Thread: Is this possible

Anything is possible but the chances of those trades happening are somewhere between incredibly slim and none.

DISPLAY SETTING

BETTING ODDS

LOCALE

ARCHIVE

CBA

CALCULATORS

FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS

TOOLS

PLAYERS

WESTERN CONFERENCE

EASTERN CONFERENCE

INTERACTIVE FEATURES

MoxNix

Member Since

Favourite Team

Forum Posts

Posts per Day