SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

Capitalfail67

Caps fan idk why
Member Since
Dec. 1, 2016
Favourite Team
Washington Capitals
2nd Favourite Team
Chicago Blackhawks
Forum Posts
11351
Posts per Day
4.2
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 12:00 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Kalopsia</b></div><div>Lapierre's a year younger, plays the more valuable position as a center, and doesn't have an extensive injury history. I'd peg his value around a late 2nd, and I think it's highly unlikely he reaches the ceiling we all imagined when the Caps drafted him.

I think in general hockey fans underestimate how early players peak and assume there's more upside left than there really is. Analytics folks peg the peak for forwards at roughly 22-24 and for defensemen at around 25-27 (<a href="https://hockey-graphs.com/2017/03/23/a-new-look-at-aging-curves-for-nhl-skaters-part-1/" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">source 1</a>, <a href="https://hockeyviz.com/txt/age22" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">source 2</a>). Late bloomers do happen and it's possible Robertson and Liljegren could improve, but data suggests this year is likely the best they'll get. And yes, I also think Caps fans need to temper their expectations for Lapierre, McMichael, and Protas. Lapi should still be expected to improve next year but chances are, they are what they are at this point.

Also... don't pull that "you must not watch them" crap. Are you seriously trying to tell me you watched enough neutral hockey, and watched it closely enough, to thoroughly evaluate a player who's gotten 11 minutes a night across 87 career games on a team in another division? C'mon man, none of us are NHL scouts here.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>All_Knowing</b></div><div>While I agree more with Kalopsia regarding both players (especially Robertson - I have never been a fan of him, mostly due to his injury history at such a young age), my question was genuine and not leading - why is TOR trading these players?
Assuming they are both worth a 2nd each (not questioning that in this post), they must not be terrible. Both are RFAs and should get somewhat "cheap" contracts. They are still young. Sounds like key players for a contending team that a) are always strapped for cash and b) need youth to go along with their core veterans (like every contending team). Why does every TOR post on here have both players traded?</div></div>

I've watched about 25 Leaf games this year. Mainly bc i was intrigued by Liljegren and what they would do with him this year. Him and Sandin are very close and wondered if them playing together would help improve Sandins game. Also was waiting to see if Niemelä would get any games this year. Liljegren defensive impact was more noticeable this year. Ideally in a perfect world Capitals would have Carlson Spence and Liljegren on the RS. trading the 17oa pick for Spence. I also watched a lot of Kings games. Spence is fantastic. Much better than Clarke who teams have rated as a top prospect.

Robert has an elite shot and play bigger than his size. What do the Capitals need? shooters? scorers? yeah im taking a risk on the kid that has an elite release. Rarely do NHL overlook talent but in this scenario i believe Leafs arent utilizing their talent. Happened with Petterson with the Ducks. Marchessault on the Panthers. Nichushkin in dallas. Capitals have a coach that specializes in developing youth. Stephenson is a prime example of a franchise overlooking talent. so yeah it doesn happen. Even Leason on the ducks has overachieved in a limited role

My guess is that TML feel they need a more established middle 6 forwards. Similar to the Hawks when the let Strome go for free.

dont gotta be a scout to know when a player has a bunch of potential. Tolvanen is another GREAT example. AND DURZI
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 5:06 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:57 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMYesterday at 4:31 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMThu. at 12:23 p.m.