SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No Tavares

Created by: Ktaaffe8
Team: 2018-19 St. Louis Blues
Initial Creation Date: May 28, 2018
Published: May 29, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,750,000
1$980,000
1$1,050,000
1$975,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,125,000
Trades
1.
2.
STL
  1. 2019 6th round pick (PIT)
3.
OTT
  1. Kostin, Klim
  2. Sobotka, Vladimír
  3. 2018 1st round pick (WPG)
4.
MIN
  1. Sanford, Zachary
  2. Thompson, Tage
  3. Walman, Jake
  4. 2019 1st round pick (STL)
Additional Details:
Pick is on condition that Staal resigns
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
2019
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the STL
2020
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
Logo of the STL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$80,000,000$70,182,654$150,988$182,500$9,817,346
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,350,000$5,350,000
LW
UFA - 3
$5,125,000$5,125,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
$3,750,000$3,750,000
RW
UFA - 5
$5,187,500$5,187,500
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,725,000$5,725,000
LW, RW
NMC
UFA - 1
$5,750,000$5,750,000
LW, RW, C
NTC
UFA - 3
$894,166$894,166
C, RW
UFA - 3
$980,000$980,000
LW
UFA - 1
$3,850,000$3,850,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$1,125,000$1,125,000
C
UFA - 2
$1,050,000$1,050,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$2,750,000$2,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 2
$4,350,000$4,350,000
G
UFA - 3
$722,500$722,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$4,150,000$4,150,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$847,500$847,500
G
UFA - 1
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 1
$1,150,000$1,150,000
RD
UFA - 1
$975,000$975,000
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 29, 2018 at 12:46 a.m.
#1
Mike S.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
1. I would think Eddy and Fabbri would be getting more money
2. I would also think that trade with Carolina is heavily favored to us
3. I would also also think that Min would not trade Staal to us
This would be really great it this happened
May 29, 2018 at 12:30 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 155
Likes: 20
--Eddie? Perhaps. Fabbri? Why would he be getting more? Seriously, why do you think that?
--Whetheror not the Carolina deal favors us, there is no one in Carolina I want on the Blues, and certainly not for Parayko.
--Don't mind the Staal trade, but would rather keep the depth and give that time to Thomas or Kyrou.
May 29, 2018 at 12:39 p.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Kevin T
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 307
Likes: 13
Quoting: BAC
--Eddie? Perhaps. Fabbri? Why would he be getting more? Seriously, why do you think that?
--Whetheror not the Carolina deal favors us, there is no one in Carolina I want on the Blues, and certainly not for Parayko.
--Don't mind the Staal trade, but would rather keep the depth and give that time to Thomas or Kyrou.


You wouldn’t want Staal, Teuvo, Skinner, Hanifin, Faulk?
I agree with keeping the depth but at some point we need to go for the title with our core entering their primes. Eddie was a bridge deal btw which is what Army said he’d get this summer most likely
May 29, 2018 at 12:46 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 155
Likes: 20
Quoting: Ktaaffe8
You wouldn’t want Staal, Teuvo, Skinner, Hanifin, Faulk?
I agree with keeping the depth but at some point we need to go for the title with our core entering their primes. Eddie was a bridge deal btw which is what Army said he’d get this summer most likely


Truthfully, those players would be an upgrade over a lot of what we have. All the same, I would be disappointed by those moves, because I think there are better options. I do think your proposal is more realistic than my ideal--but at this stage of the offseason, I don't yet feel compelled to settle for realistic.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll