No need to reply to a comment that was meant for me? Making an antagonistic comment like: "Dude grow up a little bit. Everyone knew it was a joke and you keep going on and on like my 5 YO brother does. Shush already."?

Who says schools are closed....clearly CF Kindergarten is wide open.

I was lying in bed scrolling through Twitter when I decided to check CF again to see if anything else happened when it hit me how hilarious your comments were. The fact that you called me childish for "bringing Panik up" but the moment you realize that Matt brought up Panik you were silent. You then told me not to chime in. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do, the original post was made for me because he quoted 2 of my posts, mentioned my name and tried to insult me a few times.

Now from here its absolute gold. I'm not sure if you did this intentionally or not but you told me not to chime in. You had no reason to chime in because this had nothing to do with you. You then followed that up by saying
Jesus christ dude how can you even say that after the 1st post you made about me acting like your 5 YO brother. Is this a "do as I say, not as I do" type situation here because I cant tell if your being serious or not. This might be too perfect to make up but I'm struggling

It seems like you're just trying to reach for whatever you can. Everyone (and I mean everyone) from day one has known that you BSing about Panik with Matt was just that. BS. The fact that you've continued to flaunt that as if it was legit is in fact, yes, quite childish. Calling you childish in this instance wasn't chiming in antagonistically. It was stating what is pretty obvious here. Ever since I've been back I've seen nothing but your immaturity. Oh, and whether Matt brought Panik up or not, you still decided to keep up the ruse and continue beating the dead horse as they say. So if you want to keep up the charade, you're going to get called out on it.

Going to make Sean Couturier available... mainly just to listen and see what is out there. Unless i get something very worthwhile, he will not be moved. Contact me for offers. Preference would be an offer involving a top end D or elite D prospect.

I would like to move a few depth d men/AHL d men as well, so if you need bottom pair or AHL d men reach out to me about a deal.

quote=Gronk;1930948]
Dylan Gambrell[/quote]



What part of 1 post and edit is hard to understand?

1 post per team

I'll just "backflip" my team then

Rage delete!

Granlund was signed to a 2 year contract during the 2019 offseason. I thought we weren't terminating those contracts

Its already deleted. Though I dont understand the difference

Why not?

Claims are up. Please adjust pages accordingly

Tomorrow the next "waive" of placements can start until Tuesday

A reminder that with it being week 2 of waivers, you can now claim unsigned players that weren't signed in FA or drafted in UDFA.

How about instead we wait till December. We need to get straight what we have already, before adding more

The waiver placements made today are not valid and will be deleted

Sunday. Monday. Tuesday. are the days for waiver placement

Is Brandon Dubinsky expected to be ready for next year?

No he's never playing again

Then why did Calgary give up a 7th for him?

ask calgary

death, taxes, @Paolino making invalid roster moves

This is why the BOG should enforce the "list UFA signings on team pages" so it's clear to everyone who signed where.
Just using this example, both Khudobin AND Mike Smith were UFA signings and neither can be moved

If you haven't sent your players in the minors through waivers yet please do so!
If you don't know who is waiver exempt, there is a green arrow⬇️ on the player page, that represents they can pass to the minors without waiver placement

Both Florida and New York (Rangers) have Jon Gillies as active players on their rosters. Might be something for the BOG to look into when they have a spare second

i put him on waivers. not sure if he got claimed or not

He was claimed by Florida