SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

is this smart

Created by: Avs_fan437
Team: 2019-20 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 5, 2020
Published: Mar. 5, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
please not criticism, im just trying to understand how value this player is
Trades
COL
  1. Labanc, Kevin
  2. 2020 2nd round pick (COL)
SJS
  1. Bowers, Shane
  2. Kamenev, Vladislav
  3. Werner, Adam
  4. 2020 3rd round pick (TOR)
  5. 2020 7th round pick (COL)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
28$81,500,000$80,194,761$0$3,745,000$1,305,239
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,250,000$3,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,600,000$2,600,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,975,000$1,975,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$885,833$885,833 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$735,000$735,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$850,000$850,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,200,000$3,200,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$950,000$950,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,450,000$1,450,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,375,000$1,375,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$735,000$735,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
accept or decline
The chart has been hidden

Poll Options


Mar. 5, 2020 at 5:41 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2017
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 1,070
If I'm San Jose, I decline. They're in rebuild mode, so why give up a draft pick? If you take out the 2nd from SJ and the 3rd from COL, maybe? I feel like the Avs need to add though
Xqb15 liked this.
Mar. 5, 2020 at 5:46 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Not for the sharks. We arent paying you a pick to lose our good player and getting back Mediocre prosects
Mar. 5, 2020 at 10:40 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: papishark
Not for the sharks. We arent paying you a pick to lose our good player and getting back Mediocre prosects

Agree w/Kamenev he has zero value. Bowers is a real prospect that SJS could use to as a long term answer as middle 6 C but they have Dahlen so probably a no go. Werner is like all goalies a bit voodoo so yeah I gotta agree the Sharks say no.
papishark liked this.
Mar. 5, 2020 at 11:15 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: Xqb15
Agree w/Kamenev he has zero value. Bowers is a real prospect that SJS could use to as a long term answer as middle 6 C but they have Dahlen so probably a no go. Werner is like all goalies a bit voodoo so yeah I gotta agree the Sharks say no.


It would have to be a first or a real useful prospect like Kaut coming back to make it worthwhile
Mar. 5, 2020 at 11:46 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2019
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 1,142
Quoting: papishark
It would have to be a first or a real useful prospect like Kaut coming back to make it worthwhile


Bowers is a Kaut level prospect, but I could see that being the asking price though the Avs would say no to a Kaut + 1st for LaBanc
papishark liked this.
Mar. 6, 2020 at 12:03 a.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Quoting: Xqb15
Bowers is a Kaut level prospect, but I could see that being the asking price though the Avs would say no to a Kaut + 1st for LaBanc


Fair, but thats what it would take from the sharks perspective
Xqb15 liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Loading animation
Submit Poll Edit