Because he cherry picks the stats he posts to paint his narrative point but he becomes a big baby when others posts and find their own stats that discredit him and whines or ignores those stats as being "false" but he demands everyone to praise his stats as being "correct". Stats are nothing but "opinions from a certain point of view" to quote an wise old man.

Well, those stats do signify certain things that do seem to objectively prove his point, logically speaking. He just seems to hate points as the only stat used, which I can somewhat understand.

Using his advance stats to compare an early 20 something year old raising star player with a late 20 year old reached his peak star player isn't a fair assessment, other than "proving" his opinionate narative. Such as stating J.T. helped push Marner into a superstar player, but not factoring Marner's own growth in talent. J.T. has peaked, so naturally his stats won't alter, while Marner is still growing, so to claim Marner is solely a byproduct of his linemates is just not fair. Marner isn't a Jimmy Carson or John Cullen afterall.