SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lines tonight

Created by: oilfire
Team: 2022-23 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 16, 2023
Published: Mar. 16, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
-Huby was good with Backlund earlier in the year, pretty frustrating it took this long to go back to it.

-Mang up is interesting, hope it gets something going.

-Looch over Pelts and Duehr is perplexing.

-I don't mind giving Ritchie another look but not over Pelts or Duehr

Nice to see Sutter trying something new, too bad it took all season to get here.
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2024
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2025
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$82,500,000$84,540,833$0$200,000-$2,040,833
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,800,000$5,800,000
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,900,000$5,900,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$800,000$800,000 (Performance Bonus$200,000$200K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,300,000$2,300,000
C, LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,950,000$4,950,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,550,000$4,550,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,500,000$4,500,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$762,500$762,500
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$863,333$863,333
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$827,500$827,500
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$750,000$750,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Mar. 16 at 10:44 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 520
Likes: 186
Hurrah for Weegs!

I take back what I said about wanting to see more from Ritchie, if he wants to be in a box, leave him in the press box.
KingofRnR liked this.
Mar. 16 at 10:49 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 35,024
Likes: 17,667
All i can say is lol at these lines
Dr_Invictus and oilfire liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:00 p.m.
#3
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 598
Oh the excitement.
oilfire liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:01 p.m.
#4
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 995
Edited Mar. 17 at 11:30 a.m.
Yup, Sutter finally found the blend button once again. As much as I respect him, his line choices have infuriated me all season

Vegas is a Bigger Team, so fine, bring in Ritchie who is Younger and can actually Score and/or Gilbert who will lay out Hits and Fight if need be, but to play Lucic at all and over Duehr & Pelletier is just terrible. Good on Stecher for Fighting tonight though, way to Grip & Rip hey lol

Will be interesting to see what Mang does, but he's a Sniper and Lindy & Toff (both Snipers as well) need a Play Maker, so why not put Ruzicka back in that spot?

Huby didn't click with Lindy well at all, but he did with Backlund, so why not give them a Sniper like Toffoli (12.1% Shot Percentage), Mangiapane (8.5% = 1/2 what he's usually good for), Duehr (16.7% and he's got speed), Dube (14.4%) or Ruzicka (10.2%); not Coleman

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Mang/Duehr/Dube
Pelletier/Dube/Mang-Kadri-Coleman
Ritchie-Lewis-Dube/Duehr

OR

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Mang/Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Toffoli/Mang
Pelletier-Kadri-Duehr/Coleman
Ritchie-Dube-Coleman/Duehr

Pelletier isn't scoring enough, but at least he's good defensively and on the back & stick check; maybe don't put him out in OT just yet though

I like Weegar-Andersson and Hanifin-Tanev pairings and had no problem with Zadorov-Gilbert, even if Stecher is more experienced and might be better. Gilbert is Bigger, Tougher and Isn't Afraid to jump up in to the play in the O-Zone either
oilfire, Dr_Invictus and soooonk liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:18 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 520
Likes: 186
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yup, Sutter finally found the blend button once again. As much as I respect him, his line choices have infuriated me all season

Vegas is a Bigger Team, so fine, bring in Ritchie who is Younger and can actually Score and/or Gilbert who will lay out Hits and Fight if need be, but to play Lucic at all and over Duehr & Pelletier is just terrible. Good on Stecher for Fighting tonight though, way to Grip & Rip hey lol

Will be interesting to see what Mang does, but he's a Sniper and Lindy & Toff (both Snipers as well) need a Play Maker, so why not put Ruzicka back in that spot?

Huby didn't click with Lindy well at all, but he did with Backlund, so why not give them a Sniper like Toffoli (12.1% Shot Percentage), Mangiapane (8.5% = 1/2 what he's usually good for), Duehr (16.7% and he's got speed), Dube (14.4%) or Ruzicka (10.2%); not Coleman

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Duehr/Dube
Pelletier-Kadri-Coleman
Ritchie-Lewis-Dube/Duehr

OR

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Mang/Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Toffoli/Mang
Pelletier-Kadri-Duehr/Coleman
Ritchie-Dube-Coleman/Duehr

Pelletier isn't scoring enough, but at least he's good defensively and on the back & stick check; maybe don't put him out in OT just yet though

I like Weegar-Andersson and Hanifin-Tanev pairings and had no problem with Zadorov-Gilbert, even if Stecher is more experienced and might be better. Gilbert is Bigger, Tougher and Isn't Afraid to jump up in to the play in the O-Zone either


Huby, Backlund, Mang sounds good to me. As much as I would like to see Toffoli move around trying to wake up some other guys, I see how it doesn't make a lot of sense screwing with one of the few things that actually works.

Putting Rosy back up with Lindy and Toff again makes sense to me.
Mar. 16 at 11:21 p.m.
#6
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 598
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yup, Sutter finally found the blend button once again. As much as I respect him, his line choices have infuriated me all season

Vegas is a Bigger Team, so fine, bring in Ritchie who is Younger and can actually Score and/or Gilbert who will lay out Hits and Fight if need be, but to play Lucic at all and over Duehr & Pelletier is just terrible. Good on Stecher for Fighting tonight though, way to Grip & Rip hey lol

Will be interesting to see what Mang does, but he's a Sniper and Lindy & Toff (both Snipers as well) need a Play Maker, so why not put Ruzicka back in that spot?

Huby didn't click with Lindy well at all, but he did with Backlund, so why not give them a Sniper like Toffoli (12.1% Shot Percentage), Mangiapane (8.5% = 1/2 what he's usually good for), Duehr (16.7% and he's got speed), Dube (14.4%) or Ruzicka (10.2%); not Coleman

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Duehr/Dube
Pelletier-Kadri-Coleman
Ritchie-Lewis-Dube/Duehr

OR

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Mang/Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Toffoli/Mang
Pelletier-Kadri-Duehr/Coleman
Ritchie-Dube-Coleman/Duehr

Pelletier isn't scoring enough, but at least he's good defensively and on the back & stick check; maybe don't put him out in OT just yet though

I like Weegar-Andersson and Hanifin-Tanev pairings and had no problem with Zadorov-Gilbert, even if Stecher is more experienced and might be better. Gilbert is Bigger, Tougher and Isn't Afraid to jump up in to the play in the O-Zone either


I could sum up the problems with this team in one sentence: No franchise elite player. There is no real threat from any one player on this team.
oilfire liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:38 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 520
Likes: 186
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
I could sum up the problems with this team in one sentence: No franchise elite player. There is no real threat from any one player on this team.


I would say Huby and Lindholm have the potential to be considered that, but just aren't there this year. I would agree that they need an elite goal scorer to complement them. Too bad there weren't any of those for sale this year 🙄
Mar. 16 at 11:43 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 35,024
Likes: 17,667
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yup, Sutter finally found the blend button once again. As much as I respect him, his line choices have infuriated me all season

Vegas is a Bigger Team, so fine, bring in Ritchie who is Younger and can actually Score and/or Gilbert who will lay out Hits and Fight if need be, but to play Lucic at all and over Duehr & Pelletier is just terrible. Good on Stecher for Fighting tonight though, way to Grip & Rip hey lol

Will be interesting to see what Mang does, but he's a Sniper and Lindy & Toff (both Snipers as well) need a Play Maker, so why not put Ruzicka back in that spot?

Huby didn't click with Lindy well at all, but he did with Backlund, so why not give them a Sniper like Toffoli (12.1% Shot Percentage), Mangiapane (8.5% = 1/2 what he's usually good for), Duehr (16.7% and he's got speed), Dube (14.4%) or Ruzicka (10.2%); not Coleman

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Duehr/Dube
Pelletier-Kadri-Coleman
Ritchie-Lewis-Dube/Duehr

OR

Ruzicka-Lindholm-Mang/Toffoli
Huberdeau-Backlund-Toffoli/Mang
Pelletier-Kadri-Duehr/Coleman
Ritchie-Dube-Coleman/Duehr

Pelletier isn't scoring enough, but at least he's good defensively and on the back & stick check; maybe don't put him out in OT just yet though

I like Weegar-Andersson and Hanifin-Tanev pairings and had no problem with Zadorov-Gilbert, even if Stecher is more experienced and might be better. Gilbert is Bigger, Tougher and Isn't Afraid to jump up in to the play in the O-Zone either


Any team that hit turns on the blender too often is doomed to fail. Though I do think our lines needed some tinkering i think this is just absurd. I konda hope that we just promote Sutter to president of hockey ops this summer. That way he's not GM and he's not coach but he's still part of the organization. He's still got a good relationship with ownership and that is an important thing for that position as dealing with ownership is one of their main purposes.
oilfire liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:48 p.m.
#9
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 995
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
I could sum up the problems with this team in one sentence: No franchise elite player. There is no real threat from any one player on this team.

I think there were far greater expectations of Huberderdeau and Markstrom this season obviously, but the rest is likely by design

Treliving would rather have a balanced lineup throughout than a Super Star and a bunch of league minimum Bottom-9 and 3rd Pairing D-Men. Our Prospects haven't really stepped in and made an impression like we'd hoped either

All-in-All, Sutter's right, we're not getting the Big Goals from the Top Guys when we need them, our Goaltending has been Spotty and Below Average and between Injuries and Kylington being out, our Defence Pairings have been a revolving door all year. Nobody is playing to their full potential other than maybe Toffoli, Backlund & Lewis and maybe Andersson & Coleman
oilfire liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:49 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2022
Posts: 520
Likes: 186
Edited Mar. 16 at 11:54 p.m.
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Any team that hit turns on the blender too often is doomed to fail. Though I do think our lines needed some tinkering i think this is just absurd. I konda hope that we just promote Sutter to president of hockey ops this summer. That way he's not GM and he's not coach but he's still part of the organization. He's still got a good relationship with ownership and that is an important thing for that position as dealing with ownership is one of their main purposes.


Kinda puts whoever the GM is, in a tough position to be able to do their job with any sort of autonomy, but if it gets him off the bench I'm cool with it.
Dr_Invictus liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:56 p.m.
#11
TrevorA
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2021
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 995
Edited Mar. 17 at 12:03 a.m.
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Any team that hit turns on the blender too often is doomed to fail. Though I do think our lines needed some tinkering i think this is just absurd. I konda hope that we just promote Sutter to president of hockey ops this summer. That way he's not GM and he's not coach but he's still part of the organization. He's still got a good relationship with ownership and that is an important thing for that position as dealing with ownership is one of their main purposes.

Sure, but Sutter can't play the game for them and if it's not working, you gotta do something, otherwise by definition you're insane if you simply do the same thing over and over and yet expect different results

Seems like when the lines have been changed, it helps jump start them for a bit only to fall off again, even the Mang-Backs-Coleman line has died recently

We haven't been able to find anything that has clicked or been solid, consistent & reliable all season; well other than us all agreeing Lucic will be in the lineup and probably shouldn't be

I'm not sure I want to necessarily become a Sutter defender, but his system has had us out playing and out shooting our opponents the vast majority of the time, yet we haven't gotten the goals or saves we needed to win more games and have just had way too many defensive breakdowns this year, especially on the PP and after dominating the play for a prolonged period of time
oilfire liked this.
Mar. 16 at 11:57 p.m.
#12
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 35,024
Likes: 17,667
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
I could sum up the problems with this team in one sentence: No franchise elite player. There is no real threat from any one player on this team.


Huberdeau is absolutely that caliber of player. Outside of Gaudreau and Tkachuk go look at the last like 5 star players to be coached by Sutter. Brown, Kopitar, Iginla, Selanne, Bolen, Friesen. They all had major drop offs in production under Sutter
oilfire liked this.
Mar. 17 at 1:02 a.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 35,024
Likes: 17,667
Quoting: oilfire
Kinda puts whoever the GM is, in a tough position to be able to do their job with any sort of autonomy, but if it gets him off the bench I'm cool with it.


Then you bring in a confident GM. Tre is a confident Gam so i dont mind him coming back. Dubas is a confident GM, despite some of his flaws he's still not going to be pushed around
oilfire liked this.
Mar. 17 at 1:28 a.m.
#14
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 598
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Huberdeau is absolutely that caliber of player. Outside of Gaudreau and Tkachuk go look at the last like 5 star players to be coached by Sutter. Brown, Kopitar, Iginla, Selanne, Bolen, Friesen. They all had major drop offs in production under Sutter


I don't disagree with the "Sutter effect". Huberdeau's best years are behind him though. I'm sure he will bounce back to a reasonable 80+ point level. He isn't a franchise maker though, and certainly not at 10MM against the cap. Every team that has one the cup in the last 20 years has had an Elite top line center or Defender (sometimes both) in their prime. You need a concentration of talent in a few key positions to win: scoring by committee in a mediocre fashion doesn't win cups. If Fox, Gudreau and Tkachuk stayed, it would be a different story. You need to draft that talent, because trading for it is always in the twilight years.
Mar. 17 at 1:31 a.m.
#15
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 598
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Any team that hit turns on the blender too often is doomed to fail. Though I do think our lines needed some tinkering i think this is just absurd. I konda hope that we just promote Sutter to president of hockey ops this summer. That way he's not GM and he's not coach but he's still part of the organization. He's still got a good relationship with ownership and that is an important thing for that position as dealing with ownership is one of their main purposes.


Noooo, no, no, no no... The problem with Sutter is his influence in player acquisition and development. You keep that bafoon out of any office. He belongs on a farm.
Mar. 17 at 2:25 a.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 35,024
Likes: 17,667
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
Noooo, no, no, no no... The problem with Sutter is his influence in player acquisition and development. You keep that bafoon out of any office. He belongs on a farm.


No thats why you need a strong GM. Someone who will take advise but still make theor own decisions. Firing him looks really baf since we just signed him to an extension though
Mar. 17 at 2:32 a.m.
#17
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 598
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
No thats why you need a strong GM. Someone who will take advise but still make theor own decisions. Firing him looks really baf since we just signed him to an extension though


Ken king was great, but Sutter isn't a people person, nor is he one to not add his bias to a decision. I don't think it's a matter of the GM being strong, but his boss being fair and open minded.
Mar. 17 at 2:37 a.m.
#18
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 35,024
Likes: 17,667
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
Ken king was great, but Sutter isn't a people person, nor is he one to not add his bias to a decision. I don't think it's a matter of the GM being strong, but his boss being fair and open minded.


I think you misunderstood that point of PoHO here. They don't need to be a people person. They aren't the one dealing with players outside of contract negotiations. They deal with team economics and ownership mainly
Mar. 21 at 7:54 p.m.
#19
Dr_Invictus
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 598
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I think you misunderstood that point of PoHO here. They don't need to be a people person. They aren't the one dealing with players outside of contract negotiations. They deal with team economics and ownership mainly


You think Sutter can handle economics? It's my profession, and I can tell you he has never done anything to indicated he cares about the economics of a team, much less understands it.

I met Burke and King on a few occasions, and they were business men with a knack for how the league operated. Both were involved in arena discussions, advertising, courting partnerships, and the long term financial position of the club. Sutter was a god awful GM. I don't see how that translates to being the GM's boss. If anything he should be retired and farming. Even if he took the role as "special advisor" to the GM, it would be a drag to the organization. Sutter has a clear bias towards players that fit his mold, and they aren't players you build a team around. There is no way the partitions created between roles wouldn't bleed into hockey development. He's strong willed and hard headed. Those are decent qualities for a coach, terrible qualities for upper management.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll