SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Flames Available Cap Space Assessment - At Least This Minute

Created by: Skylardog
Team: 2017-18 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 30, 2017
Published: Jun. 30, 2017
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Determining the available cap space by signing all RFAs that need deals and have a reasonable expectation of getting some NHL time this year.
For key guys that will be playing in the NHL this season, I have tried to assess the salary at what should be the top end of the range.
Even with Bouma in the minors, it is getting a bit tight. If he stays, there would be $1.175 Million less than what is here. Would like to see at least 2 prospects playing in the NHL this year, here Janko and Klimchuk, but it could be any 2.
Defense is still missing that experienced 5-6 and up front, the top 6 forward need has not been addressed.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,750,000
2$2,500,000
2$1,250,000
2$1,250,000
2$1,250,000
2$800,000
2$1,000,000
2$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,000,000
Trades
CGY
  1. 2018 3rd round pick (CGY)
STL
    Returned pick for not signing Elliott
    Buyouts
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2018
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    2019
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the NYI
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CAR
    2020
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    Logo of the CGY
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$75,000,000$70,015,876$660,000$1,670,000$4,984,124
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $6,750,000$6,750,000
    LW
    UFA - 5
    $6,375,000$6,375,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 6
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RW
    UFA - 2
    $2,750,000$2,750,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    $863,333$863,333
    LW
    UFA - 1
    $3,575,000$3,575,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    $4,300,000$4,300,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    $1,750,000$1,750,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$637,500$638K)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    $4,500,000$4,500,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    $612,500$612,500
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    $3,125,000$3,125,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $3,375,000$3,375,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    $5,750,000$5,750,000
    RD
    UFA - 4
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    $4,650,400$4,650,400
    LD/RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    $1,250,000$1,250,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    $3,857,143$3,857,143
    RD
    UFA - 3
    $1,375,000$1,375,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    $755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
    RD
    UFA - 3
    $700,000$700,000
    RD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Jun. 30, 2017 at 8:34 a.m.
    #1
    Derek
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2016
    Posts: 1,262
    Likes: 179
    Bad practice putting developing players in the press box. Especially defensman
    Jun. 30, 2017 at 8:41 a.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 146
    Likes: 5
    Analysing what this all means, it shows that Calgary really needs to move out some salary. Moving any of, Brouwer, Stajan, or Bouma, will be very difficult. Stajan and or Bouma may be movable at the trade deadline, but that does not answer the concerns right now.

    So who is reasonably available, has value, and is expendable?

    I would suggest Ferland, packaged up with a prospect, and a draft pick, for a top 6 forward, that would be an upgrade to play with Gaudreau and Monahan. $2.73 cap space and Ferlands $2.5, would free up about $5.25 for a top 6 RW or Centre. Without moving someone, there are not many top 6 forwards that are available for $2.25.

    Then what for the veteran 5-6 DMan concerns?
    Jun. 30, 2017 at 8:43 a.m.
    #3
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 146
    Likes: 5
    Quoting: hotNreadyWings
    Bad practice putting developing players in the press box. Especially defensman


    Really are down to that based on the cap space available. Need 7 on the roster, could put Bart back up instead of Andersson.
    Jun. 30, 2017 at 8:48 a.m.
    #4
    jcambers
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2016
    Posts: 695
    Likes: 121
    Why break up the 3M line - Tkachuk, Backlund, and Frolik were great last year. I don't see why everyone is so content on breaking that line up right now.
    Though I'm not set on Ferland stick around on that 3rd line, until we can upgrade the RW position (and dump Brouwer's contract?), the line-up looks fine.
    Jun. 30, 2017 at 9:04 a.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2015
    Posts: 642
    Likes: 32
    Quoting: jcambers
    Why break up the 3M line - Tkachuk, Backlund, and Frolik were great last year. I don't see why everyone is so content on breaking that line up right now.
    Though I'm not set on Ferland stick around on that 3rd line, until we can upgrade the RW position (and dump Brouwer's contract?), the line-up looks fine.


    Completely disagree. If Calgary wants to contend they need to have 3 solid lines 1 2 and 3! To do this we will need to do some juggling... Look at the pens... Best players are not together! It makes the team harder to defend against!

    Only thing you are missing is Foo (unless you have him spending his 1st year in the A? Can't realy say if he is NHL ready as I have never seen him play?)...

    And yes please call up Bart and send Anderson back down (kid needs 1-2 more years of seasoning before he is ready.
    Skylardog liked this.
    Jun. 30, 2017 at 9:06 a.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 146
    Likes: 5
    Quoting: jcambers
    Why break up the 3M line - Tkachuk, Backlund, and Frolik were great last year. I don't see why everyone is so content on breaking that line up right now.
    Though I'm not set on Ferland stick around on that 3rd line, until we can upgrade the RW position (and dump Brouwer's contract?), the line-up looks fine.


    The reason speaks to the weaknesses that were exposed during the playoffs against Anaheim.

    Flames were minus 41 collectively in the playoffs, no member was positive. Getzlaff shut down and beat up Monahans line. Backlunds line played to a draw against Keslers line. There was no 3rd and 4th lines that was enough of a threat to score. Matching the Flames became easy for the Ducks.

    Put a young kid with Backlund to help with development, much like Tkachuk had that benefit last year, and create a 3rd powerhouse line that can score, and do a good job defensively. Lazar, many will say is not the guy, but if he lives up to his talent ability, he will be one of the key players. He needed a wake up call in Ottawa, he got it and will rebound this season. I believe by the end of the season the Bennett-Tkachuk-Lazar line will be better than Monahans line.
    Jun. 30, 2017 at 9:12 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 146
    Likes: 5
    Quoting: trdeJong


    Yes - Foo is missing. I too am not sure of where he is at. As I mentioned above, looking at 2 forward prospects in the lineup, it doesn't really matter which 2. It could be Foo and Janko, or Foo and Klimchuk, or Shink. It really doesn't change the cap too much.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll