SalarySwishSalarySwish

Crow

Created by: Eklund
Team: 2019-20 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 2, 2019
Published: Dec. 2, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Trades
SJS
  1. Crawford, Corey ($2,000,000 retained)
  2. Koekkoek, Slater
CHI
  1. Chmelevski, Alexander
  2. Dillon, Brenden
  3. 2022 2nd round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PHI
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$73,135,750$660,750$277,500$8,364,250
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$675,000$675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$960,000$960,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Dec. 2, 2019 at 6:23 a.m.
#1
Karsenbill
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 256
Not bad, addresses the backup goalie problem going down the stretch and gives Chicago a potential steal in Chmelevski. Don’t care much for Koekkoek. Chicago is likely not making the playoffs again so maybe they accept a 3rd? They’re very likely not re-signing Crawford either...
Dec. 2, 2019 at 9:21 a.m.
#2
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,717
Likes: 9,878
As a CHI fan...I'd probably do that. I don't think Dillon would stay in CHI for long though. Another pending UFA and history shows 7th dmen might even be able to fetch a 3rd rounder @ the TDL (Brendan Davidson, Nick Holden, even Kempny at the time was a fairly regular healthy scratch. Obviously WAS won out on that trade.)
Dec. 2, 2019 at 12:37 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2019
Posts: 8,796
Likes: 3,226
Um no? Why would we give up a top 4 D, a top prospect and a second for a UFA goalie and a 9th dman
Dec. 2, 2019 at 1:23 p.m.
#4
Karsenbill
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 256
Quoting: papishark
Um no? Why would we give up a top 4 D, a top prospect and a second for a UFA goalie and a 9th dman


I don’t think Chmelevski is a top prospect in the sharks org anymore. A healthy scratch for the last month and zero points in 7 AHL games...he’s been overtaken by Blichfeld, True and Kellman.

Dillon is not a top four. Not on the Sharks and not on most teams. Dunno where you got that...
Dec. 2, 2019 at 1:25 p.m.
#5
Karsenbill
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 256
Quoting: exo2769
As a CHI fan...I'd probably do that. I don't think Dillon would stay in CHI for long though. Another pending UFA and history shows 7th dmen might even be able to fetch a 3rd rounder @ the TDL (Brendan Davidson, Nick Holden, even Kempny at the time was a fairly regular healthy scratch. Obviously WAS won out on that trade.)


Dillon is a serviceable bottom pairing dman. Certainly not a 7th. And definitely not a 7th on Chicago’s D which, no offense, is terrible.
exo2769 liked this.
See All